Relative humidity requirements and incubation periods for the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides conidia infection in papaya fruit.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v9i1.24646Abstract
The research was carried out at the University of Costa Rica's phytopathology laboratory between October 1995 and March 1996. In an initial phase, some creole papaya fruits from Gu.cimo (Limón province) were used. In order to eliminate latent infections, they were washed and immersed in hot water (49° C for 20 minutes). The fruits were then randomly placed in groups of 20, which conformed each treatment. Finally, they were inoculated by spraying with 5.5 ml of a 10.000 Colletotrichum gloeosporioides spores per mililiter suspension; then they were placed in plastic boxes and stored in containers with a 30°C temperature and relative humidities of 70%, 80%, and 90%. Fruits were kept in the compartments for periods of 5, l0, 15, 20 and 25 hours. Temperature and relative humidity were monitored during the experiment through the incubator's sensors and with a portable hydrothermograph. Finally, the incidence and severity of anthracnose was evaluated. During the second phase, fruits of the Hawaiian sunrise variety were used, following the same procedures applied to the native fruits. In native fruits, 100% of those placed at 80% and 90% relative humidity were contaminated after being in the compartment for five hours. The incidence decreased in the group with 70% relative humidity. The damage level increased with increases in relative humidity, although some erratic behavior was observed. In the test with Hawaiian fruit, the disease incidence increased according with incubation time. Severity showed a similar behavour; however, there was also erratic behavour here.
Downloads
References
ARAUZ, L.E; MORA, D. 1983. Evaluación preliminar de los problemas postcosecha de seis frutas tropicales en Costa Rica. Agronomía Costarricense 7(1/2):43-53.
FAO. Italia. 1993. Codex alimentarius, pesticide residues in foOO. Vol 2. 2 ed. Roma 745p.
FORNEY, C. E; BRANDL, D.G. 1992. Control of humidity in small controlled environment chambers using glycerol- water solutions. Hort-technology 2(1) : 52 - 54.
GUPTA,O.; NEMA, K.G. 1979. Effect of different temperature and relative humidity on the development of fruit rots of papaya caused by Botryodiplodia theobromae and c.papayae. Indian Phytopathology 32: 106-107.
GUPTA, O; PATHAK Y.N. 1990. Epidemiology and management of papaya fruit rots. Summa Phytopathologica 16: 93 - 105.
MINISTERIO DE AGRICULTURA Y GANADERÍA, COSTA RICA. 1993. Plan de trabajo para la preinspección costarricense de papaya (Carica papaya), operado bajo el acuerdo USDA - APHIS - MAG 28 p,
MINISTERIO DE RECURSOS NATURALES ENERGÍA Y MINAS. COSTA RICA. 1980. Instituto Meteorológico Nacional. Mapa de isotermas e isoyetas de Costa Rica, color.
NAVARRO, J.R.; RAMÍREZ, L.R. 1993. Estudio preliminar sobre metodologías alternas para la evaluación de la severidad de las enfermedades en papaya fase postco-secha. Memorias del IX Congreso Agronómico Nacional. p. 123.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).