Phenotypic characterization of three Venezuelan sweet pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v31i3.40302Keywords:
agrobiodiversity, genetic identify, morphological descriptor, plant genetic resourcesAbstract
Introduction. The cultivated species of the genus Capsicum, among them C. chinense, are known for the pungency of their fruits, however, there are several types of this pepper that do not present pungency. Venezuelan cuisine is defined by the characteristic flavor of a class of peppers that do not present pugency, which are called sweet peppers. Among these, the best known and most used are the cultivars Rosita, Pepon, and Llanero. Objective. To characterize the Rosita, Pepon, and Llanero chilli pepper cultivar by means of 53 morphological characteristics and to determine the phenetic relationship among them. Material and methods. In a randomized block design with three treatments (cultivars) and five repetitions, 45 seedlings of each cultivar were arranged in La Vigia, Jimenez municipality of Lara state, Venezuela, in August 2017. The transplant was carried out in separate rows at 0.50 m, and the seedlings were spaced 0.50 m apart on the row. On the three plants of the central row of each experimental unit (fifteen plants in total for each cultivar) the category or value of attributes of stem, leaf, flower, fruit, and seed were determined. Results. Forty-two percent of these attributes were variable among the plants evaluated, fifteen of them were categorical and seven quantitative, and significant differences (p<0.05) were detected among cultivars. Flower and seed characteristics showed no variation among cultivars, while stem and fruits showed the greatest variation. As a whole, the morphological characteristics that presented variation allowed to identify each one of the cultivars and therefore, to discriminate them. Conclusion. The variation identified in the characteristics of the fruit is indicative of the potential for genetic improvement of the Venezuelan sweet pepper in its commercial part.
Downloads
References
Andrade, S., y H. Laurentin. 2015. Efecto del nitrato de potasio sobre la germinación de semillas de tres cultivares de ají dulce (Capsicum chinense Jacq.). Rev. Unell. Cienc. Tec. 33:25-29.
Baba, V., K. Rocha, G. Gomes, C. Ruas, P. Ruas, R. Rodrigues, and L. Azeredo. 2016. Genetic diversity of Capsicum chinense accessions based on fruit morphological characterization and AFLP markers. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 63:1371-1381. doi:10.1007/s10722-015-0325-4
Cardoso, R., C. Ruas, R. Giacomin, P. Ruas, E. Ruas, R. Barbieri, R. Rodrigues, and L. Goncalves. 2018. Genetic variability in Brazilian Capsicum baccatum germplasm collection assessed by morphological fruit traits and AFLP markers. PLoS ONE 13(5):e0196468. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196468
Carvalho, S., L. Bianchetti, C. Ragassi, C. Ribeiro, F. Reifschneider, G. Buso, and F. Faleiro. 2017. Genetic variability of a Brazilian Capsicum frutescens germplasm collection using morphological characteristics and SSR markers. Genetics Mol. Res. 16(3):gmr16039689. doi:10.4238/gmr16039689
Carvalho, S., C. Ragassi, L. Bianchetti, F. Reifschneider, G. Buso, and F. Faleiro. 2014. Morphological and genetic relationships between wild and domesticated forms of peppers (Capsicum frutescens L. and C. chinense Jacquin). Genetics Mol. Res. 13:7447-7464. doi:10.4238/2014.September.12.11
Cedeño, L., C. Carrero, y R. Jaimez. 2003. Pudrición basal del ají dulce por Haematonectria haematococca en el estado Mérida, Venezuela. Interciencia 28:590-592.
Colivet, J., G. Belloso, y E. Hurtado. 2006. Comparación del efecto inhibidor de extractos de ají dulce (Capsicum chinense) sobre el crecimiento de Escherichia coli y Bacillus sp. Saber 18:168-173. http://ojs.udo.edu.ve/index.php/saber/article/view/335/229.
de-la-Cruz-Lázaro, E., C. Marquez-Quiroz, R. Osorio-Osorio, P. Preciado-Rangel, y C. Márquez-Hernández. 2017. Caracterización morfológica in situ de chile silvestre Pico de paloma (Capsicum frutescens) en Tabasco, México. Acta Universitaria 27:10-15. doi:10.1517/au.2017.1083
Eldeen, I., M. Effendy, and T. Tengku-Muhammad. 2016. Ethnobotany: challenges and future perspectives. Res. J. Med. Plants 10:382-387. doi:10.3923/rjmp.2016
Eshbaugh, W.H. 1980. The taxonomy of the genus Capsicum (Solanaceae). Phytologia 47:153-166.
Gil-Marín, J., N. Montaño-Mata, y R. Plaza. 2012. Efecto del riego y la cobertura del suelo sobre la productividad de dos cultivares de ají dulce. Bioagro 24:143-148.
Govindaraj, M., M. Vetriventhan, and M. Srinivasan. 2015. Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: an overview of its analytical perspectives. Genet. Res. Int. 2015:431487. doi:10.1155/2015/431487
Hallewood, M., T. Chiurugwi, R. Hamilton, B. Kurtz, E. Marden, E. Welch, F. Michiels, J. Mozafari, M. Sabran, N. Patron, P. Kersey, R. Bastow, S. Dorius, S. Dias, S. McCouch, and W. Powell. 2018. Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: opportunities and challenges emerging from the science and information technology revolution. New Phytol. 217:1407-1419. doi:10.1111/nph.14993
Holmes, M., T. Hammond, G. Wogan, R. Walsh, K. Labarbera, E. Wommack, F. Martins, J. Crawford, K. Mack, L. Bloch, and M. Nachman. 2016. Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes. Mol. Ecol. 25:864-881. doi:10.1111/mec.13529
IPGRI (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute), AVRDC (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center), and CATIE (Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza). 1995. Descriptors for Capsicum (Capsicum spp.). IPGRI, Rome, Italy, AVRDC, Taipei, Taiwan, and CATIE, Turrialba, CRI.
Jaimez, R. 2000. Crecimiento y distribución de la materia seca en ají dulce bajo condiciones de déficit de agua. Agron. Trop. 50:189-200.
Jaimez, R., N. Nava, Y. Rivero, y K. Trompiz. 2002. Efecto de diferentes intensidades de poda sobre la dinámica de floración y producción de ají dulce (Capsicum chinense Jacq.). Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ) 19:132-139.
Jarret, R., and T. Berke. 2008. Variation for fruit morphological characteristics in a Capsicum chinense Jacq. Germplasm collection. HortScience 43:1694-1697. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1694.
Laurentin, H. 2009. Data analysis for molecular characterization of plant genetic resources. Genetic Res. Crop Evol. 56:277-292. doi:10.1007/s10722-008-9397-8
Moses, M., and P. Umaharan. 2012. Genetic structure and phylogenetic relationships of Capsicum chinense. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 137:250-262. doi:10.21273/JASHS.137.4.250
Montaño, N. 2000a. Efecto de la edad de trasplante sobre el rendimiento de tres selecciones de ají dulce (Capsicum chinense Jacq.). Bioagro 12:55-59.
Montaño, N. 2000b. Evaluación de tres métodos de producción de plántulas de ají dulce (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) en Jusepín, estado Monagas. Bioagro 12:81-84.
Olatunji, T., and A. Afolayan. 2019. Contribution to the classification of Capsicum annuum L. and Capsicum frutescens L. in West Africa using morphological traits. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 47:135-142. doi:10.15835/nbha47111204
Pastrán, F. 2019. Desarrollo cultural canario-venezolano desde la expresión humana, religiosa, deportiva, gastronómica y agrícola. Rev. Chakiñan Cienc. Soci. Humanidades 7:118-134.
Shirasawa, K., T. Ban, N. Nagata, and T. Murakana. 2019. Impact of genomics on Capsicum breeding. In: N. Ramchiary, and C. Kole, editors, The Capsicum genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Berlin, DEU. p. 209-219. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97217-6_13
Sudré, C., L. Goncalves, R. Rodrigues, A. do-Amaral-Júnior, E. Riva-Souza, and C. Bento. 2010. Genetic variability in domesticated Capsicum spp as assessed by morphological and agronomic data in mixed statistical analysis. Genetics Mol. Res. 9:283-294. doi:10.4238/vol9-1gmr698
Upadhyaya, H.D., C.L. Gowda, and D.V. Sastry. 2008. Plant genetic resources management: collection, characterization, conservation and utilization. J. SAT Agric. Res. 6:1-16.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).