Relaciones conceptuales: definición del constructo, bases neuroanatómicas y formas de evaluación/Conceptual relations: construct definition, neuroanatomical basis and ways of assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v27i114.2852Palabras clave:
relaciones conceptuales, relaciones taxonómicas, relaciones temáticas, conocimiento conceptual, semánticaResumen
Las relaciones conceptuales son los vínculos que conectan a los conceptos entre sí. Hay dos de ellas que tienen particular relevancia para la organización del conocimiento conceptual: las taxonómicas y las temáticas. Las investigaciones iniciales realizadas en la década del 80 se centraron en analizar si existía una primacía de un tipo de relaciones sobre el otro tanto en niños como en adultos. Los estudios más recientes están investigando sus bases neuroanatómicas. El presente trabajo constituye una revisión de los trabajos más relevantes sobre las relaciones conceptuales taxonómicas y temáticas, abarcando los estudios sobre distintas etapas del desarrollo, las bases neuroanatómicas y las formas de evaluación disponibles. Los artículos revisados afirman que las relaciones conceptuales taxonómicas y temáticas implican procesos cognitivos que pueden ser disociados, por lo tanto, se adquieren y dañan de manera independiente y tienen correlatos neuroanatómicos independientes. Se sugieren también posibles líneas de investigación futuras.
Descargas
Referencias
Abernethy, M. & Coney, J. (1993). Semantic and phonemic priming in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 28(9), 933-945. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(90)90109-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(90)90109-2
Annett, M. (1959). The classification of instances of four common class concepts by children and adults. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 29(3), 223-236. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1959.tb01503.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1959.tb01503.x
Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513-562. doi:10.1080/01690960344000026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000026
Blaye, A. & Jacques, S. (2009). Categorical flexibility in preschoolers: contributions of conceptual knowledge and executive control. Developmental Science, 12(6), 863-873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00832.x
Blewitt, P. (1994). Understanding categorical hierarchies: The earliest levels of skill. Child Development, 65, 1279-1298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1131499
Borghi, A. & Caramelli, N. (2003). Situation bounded conceptual organization in children: from action to spatial relations. Cognitive Development, 18, 49-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00161-2
Bouaffre, S. & Faita-Ainseba, F. (2007). Hemispheric differences in the time-course of semantic priming processes: evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs). Brain Cognition, 63, 123-135. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.006
Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., Garrard, P., & Hodges, J.R. (2000). Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1207-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00034-8
Cicirelli, V.G. (1976). Categorization behaviour in aging subjects. Journal of Gerontology, 31(6), 676-680. doi:10.1093/geronj/31.6.676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/31.6.676
Collins, M. (1999). Differences in semantic category priming in the left and right cerebral hemispheres under automatic and controlled processing conditions. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1071-1085. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00156-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00156-0
Deák, G. & Bauer, P. (1996). The Dynamics of Preschoolers' Categorization Choices. Child Development, 67, 740-767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1131859
Denney, N. W. & Lennon M. L. (1972). Classification: a comparison of middle and old age. Developmental Psychology, 7(2), 210-213. doi:10.1037/h0033005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033005
Estes, Z. & Jones, L. (2009). Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 112-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014677
Estes, Z., Golonka, S., & Jones, L. (2011). Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations. (pp. 249-294). En B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 54. Burlington: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00008-5
Fernández-Ríos, L. & Buela-Casal, G. (2009). Standards for the preparation and writing of psychology review articles. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9(2), 329-344.
Ford, R. (2003). Task variations and attention shifts in young children’s category learning. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(6), 495-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000118
Gardner, H. & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Critical reading of words and phrases in aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 173-190. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90015-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(76)90015-8
Gentner, D. & Brem, S. (1999). Is snow really like a shovel? Distinguishing similarity from thematic relatedness. En M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds .), Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 179-184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603494-36
Golonka, S. & Estes, Z. (2009). Thematic relations affect similarity via commonalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1454-1464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017397
Hashimoto, N., McGregor, K., & Graham, A. (2007). Conceptual Organization at 6 and 8 Years of Age: Evidence from the Semantic Priming of Object Decisions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 161-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/014)
Howard, D. & Patterson, K. (1992). Pyramids and palm trees: A test of semantic access from picture and words. Thames Valley Publishing Company, Bury St. Edmunds.
Inhelder, B. & Piaget. J. (1967). La génesis de las estructuras lógicas elementales. Buenos Aires: Guadalupe.
Kalénine, S., Peyrin, S., Pichat, C., Segebarth, C., Bonthoux, F., & Baciu, M. (2009). The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioral and fMRI study. Neuroimage 44, 1152-1162. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.043
Khateb, A., Michel, C. M., Pegna, A. J., O’Dochartaigh, S. D., Landis, T., & Annoni, J. M., (2003). Processing of semantic categorical and associative relations: an ERP mapping study. International Journal of Psychophysiology 49, 41-55. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00076-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00076-X
Kotz, S. A., Cappa, S. F., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Modulation of the Lexical–Semantic Network by Auditory Semantic Priming: An Event-Related Functional MRI Study. Neuroimage 17, 1761-1772. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1316
Kuchinke, L., van deer Meer, E. & Krueger, F. (2008). Differences in processing of taxonomic and sequential relations in semantic memory: An fMRI investigation. Brain and Cognition 69(2), 245-51. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.07.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.07.014
Lin, E. & Murphy, G. (2001). Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 3-28. doi: 10.1037//0096-344.130.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.3
Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A., & Nelson, K. (1992). Taxonomic Knowledge: What Kind and When? Child Development, 63, 978-998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1131248
Lucariello, J. & Nelson, K. (1985). Slot-filler categories as memory organizers for young children. Developmental Psychology, 21, 272-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.21.2.272
Luria, A. (1984). Conciencia y lenguaje. Madrid: Visor.
Maintenant, C., Blaye, A., & Paour, J. L. (2011). Semantic Categorical Flexibility and Aging: Effect of Semantic Relations on Maintenance and Switching. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 461-466. doi:10.1037/a0021686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021686
Maguire, M. J., Brier, M. R., & Ferree, T. C. (2010). EEG theta and alpha responses reveal qualitative differences in processing taxonomic versus thematic semantic relationships. Brain & Language, 114, 16-25. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.005
Markman, E. (1994). Constraints on word meaning in early language acquisition. Lingua, 92, 199-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(94)90342-5
Markman, E. & Hutchinson, J. (1984). Children’s sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(84)90002-1
Martínez-Cuitiño, M. & Barreyro, J. P. (2009). ¿Pirámides y Palmeras o Pirámides y Faraones? Adaptación y validación de un test de asociación semántica al español rioplatense. Revista Interdisciplinaria, 27(2).
Martinez-Cuitiño, M., Barreyro, J.P., & Jaichenco, V. (2009) Adaptación y validación en español de una herramienta de evaluación semántica: la Batería 64. Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 1(1), 24-31.
Moss, H. E., Hare, M. L., Day, P., & Tyler, L. K. (1994). A distributed memory model of the associative boost in semantic priming. Connection Science, 6(4), 413-427. doi: 10.1080/09540099408915732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540099408915732
Murphy, G. (2002). The big book of concepts. Massachussets: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001
Nelson, K. (1988). Where do taxonomic categories come from? Human Development, 31, 3-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000273198
Nguyen, S. & Murphy, G. (2003). An Apple Is More than Just a Fruit: Cross-Classification in Children's Concepts. Child Development, 74, 1783-1806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00638.x
Osborne, J., & Calhoun, D. (1998). Themes, taxons, and trial types in children's matching to sample: Methodological considerations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 35-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1997.2420
Pennequin, V., Fontaine, R., Bonthoux, F., Scheuner, N., & Blaye, A. (2006). Categorization deficit in old age: Reality or artefact? Journal of Adult Development, 13, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-006-9000-5
Peraita, H., Diaz, C., & Anlló- Vento, L. (2008). Processing of semantic relations in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(1), 33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.09.001
Peraita, H., González-Labra, M.J., Sánchez Bernardos, M.L. y Galeote, M. (2000). Batería de evaluación del deterioro de la memoria semántica en Alzheimer. Psicothema, 12(2), 192-200.
Rizzolatti, G., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1999). Neuropsychology. Introductory concepts. En G. Denes y L. Pizzamiglio (Eds.), Handbook of clinical and experimental neuropsychology. Hove, England: Erlbaum Press.
Sachs, O., Weis, S., Krings, T., Huber, W., & Kircher, T. (2008). Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: Neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations. Neuropsychologia, 46, 409-418. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.015
Sachs, O., Weis, S., Zellagui, N., Huber, W., Zvyagintsev, M., Mathiak, K., & Kircher, T. (2008). Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: Neural activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories. Brain Research 1218, 194-205. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.045
Sass, K., Sachs, O., Krach, S., & Kircher, T. (2009). Taxonomic and thematic categories: Neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI. Brain Research, 1270, 78-87. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.013
Semenza, C., Bisiacchi, P., & Romani, L. (1992). Naming disorders and semantic representations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 349-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067920
Semenza, C., Denes, G., Lucchese, D., & Bisiacchi, P. (1980). Selective Deficit of Conceptual Structures in Aphasia: Class versus Thematic Relations. Brain and Language 10, 243-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(80)90054-1
Siaw, S. (1984). Developmental and population comparisons of taxonomic and thematic organization in free recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 755-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.76.5.755
Smiley, S. & Brown, A. (1979). Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 249-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(79)90087-0
Vivas, L. (2012). Procesamiento de Relaciones Conceptuales en Pacientes con Lesiones Neurológicas Focales. Salamanca: Editorial Universidad de Salamanca.
Waxman, S. & Namy, L. (1997). Challenging the notion of a thematic preference in young children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 555-567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.33.3.555
Wisniewski, E. & Bassok, M. (1999). What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3-4), 208-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0723
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2015 Actualidades en Psicología
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Unported.
Cómo citar
