Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica ISSN Impreso: 0034-8252 ISSN electrónico: 2215-5589

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/oai
Gradual and categorical separation in the Phaedo
PDF (Español (España))
HTLM (Español (España))

Keywords

Formas
Platón
Separación
Modalidad
Alma
Forms
Plato
Separation
Modality
Soul

How to Cite

Peña Raigoza, J. A. (2025). Gradual and categorical separation in the Phaedo. Revista De Filosofía De La Universidad De Costa Rica, 64(168), 143–156. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/59671

Abstract

One of the problems for Plato's theory of Ideas is “separation.” And that this has a unique meaning. I propose that Plato saw “separation” non-univocally, believing that it occurs in two important ways. One that I will call “gradual” and another stronger that I will call “categorical”, and that the Phaedo shows these two different types of separation when talking about the soul. This leaves the door open to a moral interpretation of separation and contributes to diluting the mind-body problem. Also, it could support a non-univocal interpretation of the separation of the Forms.

PDF (Español (España))
HTLM (Español (España))

References

Broadie, Sarah. 2001. “Soul and Body in Plato and Descartes”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):295-308.

Carone, Gabriela Roxana. 2005. “Mind and Body in Late Plato”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (3):227-269.

Clark, Stephen. 1975 “Death”. En Aristotle's Man: Speculations upon Aristotelian Anthropology (Oxford, online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct. 2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245162.003.0011

Cohoe, Caleb. 2022. “The Separability of Nous”. En Aristotle's On the Soul: A Critical Guide (Cambridge Critical Guides, pp. 229-246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108641517.013

Cornelli, Gabriele. 2019. “Separation of Body and Soul in Plato’s Phaedo: An Unprecedented Ontological Operation in the Affinity Argument”. En: Pitteloud, Keeling, (eds.) Psychology and Ontology in Plato. Philosophical Studies Series, volumen 139. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04654-5_3

Devereux, Daniel. 1999. “Separation and Inmanence in Plato´s Theory of Forms”. En Gail Fine (ed.), Plato 1 Metaphysics and Epistemology, Oxford University Press, New York (1999).

Fierro, María Angélica. 2013. “Alma encarnada-cuerpo amante en el Fedón de Platón”. En Benítez Grobet, L. & Velázquez Zaragoza, A. (Eds.), Tras las huellas de Platón y el platonismo en la filosofía moderna. De su simiente griega a la Ilustración. México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Fine, Gail. 1984. “Separation”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 2, 31-87.

________ . 1986. “Inmanence”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 4, 71-97.

________ . 1993. On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Harte, Verity. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. New York: Oxford University Press.

Johansen, Thomas Kjeller. 2017. “The Separation of Soul from Body in Plato’s Phaedo”. Philosophical Inquiry, 41, 17-28.

Morrison, Donald. 1985. “Separation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 3, pp. 125-157.

Matoso, Renato. 2017. “Separation and its language in Plato”. Filosofia Unisinos 18 (3):184-188.

Pakaluk, Michael. 2003. “Degrees of separation in the Phaedo”. Phronesis, 48(2), 89–115.

Ross, William David. 1924. Aristotle's Metaphysics. A Revised text with Introduction and Commentary. Vol II. Oxford University Press.

Thomas, Christine (2003). Colloquium 2: Plato on the Nature of Life Itself. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, 18(1), 39–73. doi:10.1163/22134417-90000038

Vlastos, Gregory. 1982. “The Socratic Elenchus”. The Journal of Philosophy, 79(11), 711. doi:10.2307/2026548

__________ . 1987. “Separation in Plato”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. V, pp. 187-197, (p.187).

Woolf, Raphael. 2004. “The practice of a philosopher”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26:97-129.

##plugins.facebook.comentarios##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.