Pensamiento Actual ISSN Impreso: 1409-0112 ISSN electrónico: 2215-3586

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/pensamiento-actual/oai
The Rhetorical Style Structure of the Personal Letter Genre: Contemporary English, Spanish, and Middle Ages Style Structures Compared
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

rhetoric
style
genre
letter style
letter genre
retórica
estilo
género
carta personal
género de carta

Abstract

A look at rhetoric from a stylistic standpoint allows building understanding of current rhetorical practices as evolved forms of rhetoric. By following a qualitative research design described as content analysis by Leedy and Ormrod (2001), the present study describes the style structure differences and similarities in contemporary personal letter writing in English and Spanish as compared to the style structure of letter writing in the middle ages. It was concluded that personal letter writing in both English and Spanish does not fully comply with the style structure cannon of letter writing established for each class. Also, English and Spanish contemporary personal letter writing are rather similar, and the style structure cannons for contemporary personal letter writing in both English and Spanish can be traced back to that of the Middle Ages.

https://doi.org/10.15517/pa.v20i34.41834
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

¿Cómo citar este artículo?

Gamboa, R. (2020). The Rhetorical Style Structure of the Personal Letter Genre: Contemporary English, Spanish, and Middle Ages Style Structures Compared. Pensamiento Actual, 20(34), 32-48. https://doi.org/10.15517/pa.v20i34.41834

Bly, R. W. (2004). Webster’s New world Letter Writing Handbook. Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis.

Borchers, T. and Hundley, H. (2018). Rhetorical Theory. An Introduction. 2nd ed. Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL.

Brummett, B. (2018). A Rhetoric of Style. Southern Illinois University Press, Corbondale.

Burke, M. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. Routledge Handbooks in English Language

Studies. Routledge, New York.

Cohen, L, Manion, L and Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education. Sixth ed. Routledge, New York.

Etikan, I. (2016). “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling.”, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1-4 0.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

Foss, S. K. (2018). Rhetorical Criticism. Exploration and Practice, 5th ed. Long Waveland Press, Grove, IL.

Herrick, J. (2013). The History and Theory of Rhetoric: An Introduction, 5th ed. Pearson Education, Inc.,

New Jersey.

Moessner, L. (2001). “Genre, Text Type, Style, Register:A Terminological Maze?”, European Journal of English Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 131. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1076/ejes.5.2.131.7312.

Leedy, P. D. and Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical Research. Planning and Design, 9th ed. Pearson Education

Inc., New Jersey.

Perelman, L. (1991). “The Medieval Art of Letter writing: Rhetoric as an Institutional Expression”, in Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary studies of Writing in Professional Communities, Bazrman, C & James, P (ed). Wisconsin University Press, Wisconsin, pp. 97-119.

Pineda, M. I. and Lemus, F. J. (2005). Taller de Lectura y Redacción I. Pearson Education, Mexico.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students, 5th ed. Pearson Education Limited, Essex.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.