Keywords
digital Technologies
digital skills
technological tools and applications
pedagogical praxis
self-reflection.
Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (TIC)
tecnologías digitales
habilidades digitales
herramientas tecnológicas y aplicaciones
praxis pedagógica
auto-reflexión
How to Cite
Abstract
This article reports on the systematization of an experience that focused on an intervention to help three underachieving learners in a course of English composition at a public university in Costa Rica. Extra exercises after delayed feedback were implemented by using Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to provide learners with opportunities to use the feedback previously received. The experience consisted of documenting what happened. The study also elaborates on an explanation of the findings accomplished as a result of the intervention. The objective was to interpret the experience critically for self-reflection and future pedagogical praxis improvement. The study used qualitative analysis techniques and a systematization model. The results suggest that 1) delayed feedback use in extra activities contributed to learners' preparation and academic progress and 2) that the acquisition of new knowledge in digital skills plays a vital role in the correct use and integration of digital technologies such as ICT tools and applications (e.g., Zoom and Kahoot!) for the process of teacher’s professional development and pedagogical praxis improvement. In conclusion, the implementation of an ICT tool and learning application allowed underachieving learners to progress academically. Besides, the instructor achieved digital competence in using Zoom and Kahoot!. This new knowledge obtained during the intervention helped the course’s professor to reflect on his practice.
References
Akinkuolie, A., & Sanni, R. (2016). Identification and Remediation of Factors Causing Underachievement of Students’ Performance in Senior School Certificate (SSC) Biology. Greener Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjer.2016.3.040416072
Burke, K. (2020). Virtual praxis: Constraints, approaches, and innovations of online creative arts teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103143
Cheng, V. (2010). Tensions and dilemmas of teachers in creativity reform in a Chinese context. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(3), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.09.005
Chiang, T. (2019). How do underachieving working class students survive in the classroom? Critiques on the perspective of resistance. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.007
Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design:Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Third Ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cruz, M., Sandí, J., & Víquez, I. (2017). Diseño de situaciones educativas innovadoras como estrategia didáctica para fortalecer el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Didasc@lia: Didáctica y Educación, 8(2), 99–116. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6632895
Cruz, M., A., Sanz, C., & Baldassarri, S. (2019). Analyzing Experiences with Active Objects in Interaction-Based Educational Activities. Proceedings of the XX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Article No. 19, (pp. 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3335595.3335616
Cuberos de Quintero, M., & Vivas, M. (2017). Relación entre didáctica, gerencia y el uso educativo de las TIC. Revista Electrónica Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 17(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v17i1.27198
Cuaca Dharma, H., Asmarani, D., & Dewi, U. P. (2017). Basic Japanese Grammar and Conversation e-learning through Skype and Zoom Online Application. Procedia Computer Science, 116, 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.055
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
Gutiérrez, I., & Serrano, J. (2016). Evaluation and development of digital competence in future primary school teachers at the University of Murcia. NAER. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2016.1.152
Hu, X., & McGeown, S. (2020). Exploring the relationship between foreign language motivation and achievement among primary school students learning English in China. System, 89, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102199
Husu, J., & Tirri, K. (2007). Developing whole school pedagogical values-A case of going through the ethos of “good schooling.” Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.015
Jacobs, H. L. M. (2008). Information Literacy and Reflective Pedagogical Praxis. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(3), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.03.009
Jara, Ó. (2020). Orientaciones teórico-prácticas para la sistematización de experiencias. Revista DECISIO Saberes Para La Acción En Educación de Adultos, 28, 1–17. http://centroderecursos.alboan.org/ebooks/0000/0788/6_JAR_ORI.pdf
Kali, Y., Sagy, O., Benichou, M., Atias, O., & Levin‐Peled, R. (2019). Teaching expertise reconsidered: The technology, pedagogy, content and space (TPeCS) knowledge framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2162–2177. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12847
Kim, S., & Arbel, Y. (2019). Immediate and delayed auditory feedback in declarative learning: An examination of the feedback related event related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 129, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.001
Klima, I. (2020). Action research as a methodology for professional development in leading an educational process. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100826
Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning and Technology, 20(2), 81–97. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/lee.pdf
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. 84, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006
López, L, & Foster, M. (2021). Examining heterogeneity among Latino dual language learners’ school readiness profiles of English and Spanish at the end of Head Start. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101239
Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N., & Finn, B. (2009). Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning. Memory and Cognition, 37(8), 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.8.1077
Moreno, J., Silveira, Y., & Belando, N. (2015). Questionnaire evaluating teaching competencies in the university environment. Evaluation of teaching competencies in the university. NAER. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 4(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2015.1.106
Muñoz., F. O., Medina., A., & Guillén-Lúgigo, M. (2016). Jerarquización de competencias genéricas basadas en las percepciones de docentes universitarios. Educación Química, 27(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eq.2015.11.002
Orhan Göksün, D., & Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers and Education, 135, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.015
Padilla, N., Medina, N., Gutiérrez, F., Paderewski, P., López, J., Núñez, M., & Rienda, J. (2015). Evaluación continua para aprendizaje basado en competencias: Una propuesta para videojuegos educativos. Revista Iberoamericana de Informática Educativa, 21, 25–38.https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5113266
Procter, L. (2012). What is it about Field Trips? Praxis, Pedagogy and Presence in Virtual Environments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 980–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.588
Samaras, A., Gudjónsdóttir, H., McMurrer, J., & Dalmau, M. (2012). Self-study of a Professional Organization in Pursuit of a Shared Enterprise. Studying Teacher Education, 8(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2012.719127
Sandí, J. (2020). Desarrollo de competencias digitales en el profesorado a través de juegos serios: un estudio de caso aplicado en la Universidad de Costa Rica (UCR). E-Ciencias de la Información, 10(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.15517/eci.v10i2.38946
Sandí, J., & Sanz, C. (2018). Revisión y análisis sobre competencias tecnológicas esperadas en el profesorado en Iberoamérica. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 66, 93–121. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2018.66.1225
Schipper, T., Goei, S. L., de Vries, S., & van Veen, K. (2017). Professional growth in adaptive teaching competence as a result of Lesson Study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.015
Shawer, S. (2017). Teacher-driven curriculum development at the classroom level: Implications for curriculum, pedagogy and teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.017
Soler, R., Soler, J. R., & Araya, I. (2017). Diagnosis of Educational Needs for the Implementation of Blended Courses Based on the Blended Learning Model. The Case of the Social Sciences Faculty of the National University of Costa Rica. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 1316–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.216
Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002
Vicars, M., Steinberg, S., McKenna, T., & Cacciattolo, M. (2015). The Praxis of English Language Teaching and Learning (PELT). SENSE PUBLISHERS.
Wang, A., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review. Computers and Education, 149, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818
Comments
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Pensamiento Actual