Abstract
Pine plantations in the tropics are often employed to recondition eroded slopes from mudslides, as the Pinus caribaea plantation that shields the Universidad Simón Bolívar campus in Caracas (Venezuela). However, mismanagement of this plantation has led to its rapid degradation. The best option to maintain the protective service is to restore the plantation and direct its successional trajectory towards the neighbouring montane forest. Through experimental manipulation, we aimed to determine which factors block secondary succession and to investigate their effects. Within the experimental constraints imposed by the plantation small area, we analysed the effects of light and fertility limitation, litter accumulation and access to seed on plantation restoration. Light availability was manipulated by clearing and thinning three 800 m2 main plots. Fertilization and litter removal was applied to sub-plots within the light plots. Soils were analysed, microclimate was monitored and, for four years, stem density, species richness and basal area were tallied. Our results showed that light accessibility was the main factor deterring the successional trajectory of the plots, with varying grades of interaction with the sub-treatments. By the end of the fourth year, the cleared plot showed the largest responses in all traits (triplicating stem density and basal area and >20 times higher species richness). The main colonizers were Croton megalodendron, Ocotea fendleri, and Clusia spp. all dominant trees in the nearby native forest. We concluded that the results of this pioneer study, showed that small clearings, repeated in 3-4 year cycles are appropriate for similar restoration schemes. This procedure would create a mosaic of vegetation patches at different successional stages while protecting the slopes from erosion and increasing local biodiversity.
References
AGROFORCA. (1990). Informe técnico forestal para realizar un aclareo en el bosque de pino de la Universidad Simón Bolívar. Caracas, Venezuela: Servicios Técnicos Agroforestales C.A.
Ashton, M. S., Gunatilleke, C. V. S., Gunatilleke, I. U. N., Singhakumara, B. M. P., Gamage, S., Shibayama, T., & Tomimura, C. (2014). Restoration of rain forest beneath pine plantations: A relay floristic model with special application to tropical South Asia. Forest Ecology and Management, 329, 351-359.
Ashton, P. S., Gamage, S., Gunatilleke, I. U. N., & Gunatilleke, C. V. S. (1997). Restoration of a Sri Lankan rainforest: Using Caribbean pine (Pinus caribaea) as a nurse for establishing late-successional tree species. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 915-925.
Baruch, Z. & Nozawa, S. (2014). Abandoned coffee plantations: biodiversity conservation or path for non-native species? A case study from a Neotropical montane forest. Interciencia, 39, 554-561.
Berthrong, S. T., Jobbagy, E. B., & Jackson, R. B. (2009). A global meta-analysis of soil exchangeable cations, pH, carbon, and nitrogen with afforestation. Ecological Applications, 19, 2228-2241.
Bueno, A., & Baruch, Z. (2011). Soil seed bank and the effect of the needle litter layer on seedling emergence in a tropical pine plantation. Revista de Biología Tropical, 59, 1071-1079.
Cavalier, J., & Tobler, A. (1998). The effect of abandoned plantations of Pinus patula and Cupressus lusitanica on soils and regeneration of a tropical montane rain forest in Colombia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7, 335-347.
Chazdon, R. L. (2003) Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 6, 51-71.
Craine, S. I. & Orians, C. M. (2004). Pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.) invasion of Cape Cod pond shores alters abiotic environment and inhibits indigenous herbaceous species. Biological Conservation, 116, 181-189.
De Abreu, R. C. R., de Assis, G. B., Aguirre, A., & Durigan, G. (2011). Can native vegetation recover after slash pine cultivation in the Brazilian Savanna? Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 1452-1459.
Dodson, E. K., Peterson, D. W., & Harrod, R. H. (2008). Understory vegetation response to thinning and burning restoration treatments in dry conifer forests of the eastern Cascades, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 3130-3140.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2010). Global Forest Resources Assessment. Rome, Italy: FAO Forestry Paper 163.
Fernández, C., Lelong, B., Vila, B., Mévy, J-P., Robles, C., & Greff, S. (2006). Potential allelopathic effect of Pinus halepensis in the secondary succession: an experimental approach. Chemoecology, 16, 97-105.
Fimbel, R. A., & Fimbel, C. C. (1996). The role of exotic conifer plantations in rehabilitating degraded tropical forest lands: A case study from the Kibale Forest in Uganda. Forest Ecology and Management, 8, 215-226.
Gómez-Aparicio, L., Zavala, M. A., Bonet, F. J., & Zamora, R. (2009). Are pine plantations valid tools for restoring Mediterranean forests? An assessment along abiotic and biotic gradients. Ecological Applications, 19, 2124-2141.
Gómez, Y., Paolini, J., & Hernández, R. M. (2008). Sustitución de la sabana nativa con plantaciones de Pinus caribaea (Pinaceae) en Venezuela: efecto sobre parámetros indicadores de cambios en el carbono del suelo. Revista de Biología Tropical, 56, 2041-2053.
Goodale, E., Kottagama, S. W., Shankar Raman, T. R., Shidu, S., Goodale, U. M., Parker, S., & Chen, J. (2014). The response of birds and mixed-species bird flocks to human modified landscapes in Sri Lanka and southern India. Forestry Ecology and Management, 329, 384-392.
Guerrero, P. C., & Bustamante, R. O. (2007). Can native tree species regenerate in Pinus radiata plantations in Chile? Forest Ecology and Management, 253, 97-102.
Hokche, O., Berry, P. E., & Huber, O. (Eds.) (2008). Nuevo Catálogo de la Flora Vascular de Venezuela. Caracas,Venezuela: Fundación Instituto Botánico de Venezuela “Dr. Tobías Lasser”.
Izhaki, I., Henig-Sever, N., & Neeman, G. (2000). Soil seed banks in Mediterranean Aleppo pine forests: the effect of heat, cover and ash on seedling emergence. Journal of Ecology, 88, 667-675.
Jackson, M. L. (1982). Análisis Químico de Suelos. Barcelona, España: Omega.
Keenan, R. D. L., Woldring, O., Irvine, T., & Jensen, R. (1997). Restoration of plant biodiversity beneath tropical tree plantations in Northern Australia. Forestry Ecology and Management, 99, 17-131.
León, J. D., González, M. I., & Gallardo, J. F. (2011). Biogeochemical cycles in natural forest and conifer plantations in the high mountains of Colombia. Revista de Biología Tropical, 59, 1883-1894.
Lugo, A. E. (1992). Comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age. Ecological Monographs, 62, 1-41.
McCune, B., & Mefford, M. J. (2011). PC-ORD Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Ver. 6. MjM Software. Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.
Murphy, J., & Riley, J. P. (1963). A modified single method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytical Chemical Acta, 27, 31-35.
Navarro-Cano, J. A., Barberá, G. G., & Castillo, V. M. (2010). Pine litter from afforestation hinders the establishment of endemic plants in semiarid scrubby habitats of Natura 2000 Network. Restoration Ecology, 18, 165-169.
Navas, A. (2010). Dispersión de Semillas por Aves desde el Bosque Nativo hasta la Plantación de Pinos de la USB (Tesis de Licenciatura). Universidad Simón Bolívar. Caracas, Venezuela.
Nissanka, S. P., Mohotti, K. M., & Wijetunga, A. S. T. B. (2005). Alleopathic influences of Pinus caribaea on vegetation regeneration and soil biodiversity. Fourth World Congress in Allelopathy. NSW, Australia: Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga.
Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., & Loeppert, R. H. (Eds.) (1996). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. Madison, WI, USA: SSSA book series 5.3.
SYSTAT (2002). SYSTAT for Windows v.10.0. Chicago, IL, USA: IBM SPSS Software.
Wadsworth, F. H. (2008). Growth of Pinus caribaea hondurensis relative to spacing and trunk diameter on two soils in Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science, 44, 236-241.
Zanne, A. E. & Chapman, C. A. (2001). Expediting reforestation in tropical grasslands: Distance and isolation from seed sources in plantations. Ecological Applications, 11, 1610-1621.
Comments
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Biología Tropical