Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

Nest-site selection of Lepidochelys olivacea (Testudines: Cheloniidae) in the South Pacific region of Costa Rica.
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))


Nest-site selection
Lepidochelys olivacea
Osa Peninsula
Selección del sitio de anidación
Lepidochelys olivacea
Península de Osa

How to Cite

Ávila-Aguilar, A. (2015). Nest-site selection of Lepidochelys olivacea (Testudines: Cheloniidae) in the South Pacific region of Costa Rica. Revista De Biología Tropical, 63(S1), 375–381.


In sea turtles, nest-site selection plays a key role in the survival of the offspring, with a direct influence on the sex of the hatchlings, incubation period, embryonic mortality, and hatchling size. Nest-site choice has been studied for most sea turtle species, but the information for Lepidochelys olivacea, the most abundant sea turtle species, is scarce. The present work explores the spatial nesting patterns of L. olivacea and seeks to determine whether this species employs a scatter nesting strategy or chooses to clump its nests based on a specific spatial preference. Night patrols were conducted between July and September 2011 at the beaches of Piro and Pejeperro, located in the Osa Peninsula, in the South Pacific region of Costa Rica. Nest-site location was evaluated by measuring the distance from the tide line to the nest, distance from nest to vegetation, and by noting beach sector according to beach-marker setup. In total, 84 nesting turtles were observed. Sea turtles in both beaches showed a strong preference to locate their nests as far from the tide line as possible, crawling longer distances when presented with wider stretches of beach. Turtles nesting at Piro beach also favored areas that were close to the river mouth, while turtles at Pejeperro preferred to nest near an estuary. It seems that the main driving force that influences L. olivacea to choose a nest site is to protect the eggs from tidal inundation, even if this means a higher predation risk from nesting too close to the vegetation, in addition to a longer trip to the ocean for both the female adult and the hatchlings. Nests near rivers and estuaries may have higher hatching success, which could prompt females to return and select these areas due to imprinting or philopatry. Future research focused on recapture could provide valuable information on individual behavior, and prove whether or not L. olivacea shows strong nest-site fidelity and repeatability of nesting preferences at the individual level.
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))


Ackerman, R. A. (1997). The nest environment and the embryonic development of sea turtles. In P. L. Lutz & J. A. Musick (Eds.), The Biology of Sea Turtles (pp. 83-106). Florida: CRC Press.

Bjorndal, K. A., & Bolten, A. B. (1992). Spatial distribution of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) nests at Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Copeia, 1992, 45-53.

Eckert, K. L. (1987). Environmental unpredictability and leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) nest loss. Herpetologica, 43, 315-323.

Garmestani, A. S., Percival, H. F., Portier, K. M., & Rice, K. G. (2000). Nest-site selection by the loggerhead sea turtle in Florida’s Ten Thousand Islands. Journal of Herpetology, 34, 504-510.

Hays, G. C., & Speakman, J. R. (1993). Nest placement by loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta. Animal Behaviour, 45, 47-53.

Horrocks, J. A., & Scott, N. M. (1991). Nest site location and nest success in the hawksbill turtle Eretmochelys imbricata in Barbados, West Indies. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 69, 1-8.

Kamel, S. J., & Mrosovky, N. (2005). Repeatibility of nesting preferences in the hawksbill sea turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata, and their fitness consequences. Animal Behaviour, 70, 819-828.

Kamel, S. J., & Mrosovky N. (2006). Inter-seasonal maintenance of individual nest site preferences in hawksbill sea turtles. Ecology, 87, 2947-2952.

López-Castro, M. C., Carmona, R., & Nichols, W. J. (2004). Nesting characteristics of the olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) in Cabo Pulmo, southern Baja California. Marine Biology, 145, 811-820.

Mortimer, J. A. (1990). The influence of beach sand characteristics on the nesting behavior and clutch survival of green turtles (Chelonia mydas). Copeia, 1990, 802-817.

Mrosovsky, N., & Yntema, C. L. (1980). Temperature dependence of sexual differentiation in sea turtles: implications for conservation practices. Biological Conservation, 18, 271-280.

Mrosovsky, N. (1983). Ecology and nest-site selection of leatherback turtles Dermochelys coriacea. Biological Conservation, 26, 47-56.

Nordmoe, E. D., Sieg, A. E., Sotherland, P. R., Spotila, J. R., Paladino, F. V., & Reina, R. D. (2004). Nest site fidelity of leatherbacks at Playa Grande, Costa Rica. Animal Behaviour, 68, 387-394.

Packard, G. C., & Packard, M. J. (1994). The physiological ecology of reptilian eggs and embryos. In C. Gans & R. B. Huey (Eds.), Biology of the reptilia 16. Ecology B: defense and life history (pp. 523-605). Michigan, USA: Branta Books.

Pritchard, P. C. H. (1997). Evolution, phylogeny, and current status. In P. L. Lutz & J. A. Musick (Eds.), The biology of sea turtles (pp. 2-24). Florida, USA: CRC Press.

Sánchez-Azofeifa, G. A., Rivard, B., Calvo, J., & Moorthy, I. (2002). Dynamics of tropical deforestation around national parks: remote sensing of forest change on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica. Mountain Research and Development, 22, 352-358.

Weishampel, J. F., Bagley, D. A., Ehrhart, L. M., & Rodenbeck, B. (2003). Spatiotemporal patterns of annual sea turtle nesting behaviors along an East Central Florida beach. Biological Conservation, 110, 295-303.

Williams-Walls, N., O’Hara, J., Gallagher, R. M., Worth, D. F., Peery, B. D., & Wilcox, J. R. (1983). Spatial and temporal trends of sea turtle nesting on Hutchinson Island, Florida, 1971-1979. Bulletin of Marine Science, 33, 55-66.



Download data is not yet available.