Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
The relationship between forest fragmentation and the potential geographical distribution of psittacids (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae) in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico
PDF
HTML

Supplementary Files

Sin título

Keywords

conservation
threatened species
environmental factors
ecological niche models
parrots
Southeastern Mexico.
conservación
especies amenazadas
factores ambientales
loros
modelos de nicho ecológico
Sureste de México.

How to Cite

Plasencia Vázquez, A. H., Escalona Segura, G., & Ferrer Sánchez, Y. (2017). The relationship between forest fragmentation and the potential geographical distribution of psittacids (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae) in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Revista De Biología Tropical, 65(4), 1470–1482. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v65i4.26482

Abstract

Parrots are a seriously threatened group because of the illegal pet trade, their habitat fragmentation and the destruction of tropical forests. This study aimed to determine the relationship between forest fragmentation and the geographic potential distribution of parrot species in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. The research was carried out in the Mexican portion of the Yucatan Peninsula Biotic region, which includes the states of Campeche, Quintana Roo and Yucatan. We worked with the eight species of psittacids that inhabit the selected areas: Eupsittula nanaAmazona albifronsAmazona xantholora, Amazona autumnalisPionus senilisPyrilia haematotisAmazona oratrix and Amazona farinosa. For these species, we used the potential geographical distribution maps that were obtained through the Maximum Entropy algorithm, published in 2014. To measure the levels of forest fragmentation in the Peninsula, we employed the land use and vegetation maps from series IV (2007-2010) of the National Institute of Statistics and Geography. We calculated different landscape metrics at 100 sites randomly distributed within the predicted presence and absence areas for the species. Multivariate methods were used to shorten dimensionality in the analysis, as well as to explore the observed patterns. We did not find any pattern regarding the number of variables that contribute to the logistic regression models (LR) and the size of the parrots’ potential geographical distribution area within the Peninsula. For Pyrilia haematotis and Amazona oratrix, the fragmentation variables used did not seem to have any relationship with their potential geographical distribution in the Peninsula (intersection, Pr < 0.0001). Only for Eupsittula nana, Amazona xantholora and Pionus senilis, we found that the mean patch edge, the mean shape index and the mean perimeter-area ratio were important to determine their potential distribution patterns, respectively; and, in general, the variables indicated the preferences of these parrots to occupy larger habitat patches. Parrots must be given a special care and protection within the states of Campeche and Quintana Roo, since there are areas with high parrot diversity and are importantly affected by human activities. The best recommendation for managers and users of protected areas within the Yucatan Peninsula is that extensive areas of forest should be maintained in order to guarantee the suvival of psittacid populations.

https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v65i4.26482
PDF
HTML

References

Akaike, H. (1983). Information measures and model selection. International Statistical Review, 44, 277-291.

Arroyo, V., & Fahrig, L. (2014). Why is a landscape perspective important in studies of primates? American Journal of Primatology, 76, 901-909. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22282

Barrera, A. (1962). La Península de Yucatán como provincia biótica. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural, 23, 71-150. Retrieved from http://repositorio.fciencias.unam.mx:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11154/142692/23VPeninsulaYucatan.pdf?sequence=1

Berlanga, M., Wood, P., Salgado, J., & Figueroa, E. M. (2000). Calakmul, AICA. In M. C. Arizmendi & L. Márquez (Eds.), Áreas de Importancia para la Conservación de las Aves en México (pp. 110-111). México D. F.: CIPAMEX.

Bregman, T. P., Sekercioglu, C. H., & Tobias, J. A. (2014). Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: Implications for ecosystem function and conservation. Biological Conservation, 169, 372-383. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.024

Brennan, J. M., Bender, D. J., Contreras, T. A., & Fahrig, L. (2002). Focal patch landscape studies for wildlife management: optimizing sampling effort across scales. In J. Liu & W. W. Taylor (Eds.), Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management (pp. 68-91). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Retrieved from http://www.glel.carleton.ca/pdf/landPub/02/02BrennanetalLiuBook.pdf

Bucher, E. (1992). Neotropical parrots as agricultural pests. In S. R. Beissinger & N. F. R. Snyder (Eds.), New World parrots in crisis. Solutions from conservation biology (pp. 201-219). New York, USA: Smithsonian Inst. Press.

Cantú, J. C., Sánchez, M. E., Grosselet, M., & Silva, J. (2007). Tráfico ilegal de pericos en México. Una evaluación detallada (Reporte Final). México: Defenders of Wildlife. Retrieved from http://www.pericosmexico.org/pdf/ReporteFinalEspanol.pdf

Carneiro, A. P. B., Jiménez, J. E., & White Jr., T. H. (2012). Post-fledging habitat selection by the Slender-Billed parakeet (Enicognathus leptorhynchus) in a fragmented agricultural landscape of Southern Chile. The Condor, 114, 166-172. Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/caribbean/pdf/post_fledginghabselection.pdf

Carranza, J., Barreto, C., Molina, C., Bezaury, J., & Loreto, A. (1996). Análisis cartográfico del cambio de uso del suelo en la península de Yucatán, México. México: Amigos de Sian Ka’an.

Cintra, R., Magnusson, W. E., & Albernaz, A. (2013). Spatial and temporal changes in bird assemblages in forest fragments in an eastern Amazonian savannah. Ecology and Evolution, 3(10), 3249-3262. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797474/

Conti, M. F., & Galetti, M. (2007). Use of forest fragments by blue-winged macaws (Primolius maracana) within a fragmented landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 953-967. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9034-9

Daniels, A., Painter, K., & Southworth, J. (2008). Milpa imprint on the tropical dry forest landscape in Yucatan, Mexico: Remote sensing and field measurement of edge vegetation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 123, 293-304. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.07.003

Davis, S. K. (2004). Area sensitivity in grassland passerines: effects of patch size, patch shape, and vegetation structure on bird abundance and occurrence in Southern Saskatchewan. The Auk, 121, 1130-1145. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[1130:ASIGPE]2.0.CO;2

Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., … Lautenbach, S., (2012). Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 35, 001-020. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x

Elkie, P. C., Rempel, R. S., & Carr, A. P. (1999). Patch analyst user’s manual a tool for quantifying landscape structure (Technical Manual TM-001). Thunder Bay: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources NWST.

Escalona, G., & Velasco, J. (2000). La milpa maya y el impacto de las aves y mamíferos en sistemas de producción agrícolas. Edzná, 42, 7-8.

ESRI (1999). ArcView 3.2. Redlands, CA, USA: ESRI (Environmental Scientific Research Institute).

Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 487-515. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419

Forshaw, J. M. (2006). Parrots of the World: an identification guide. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Galindo, C. (1999). La gran región de Calakmul: Prioridades biológicas de conservación y propuesta de modificación de la Reserva de la Biosfera (Reporte Final). México, D.F.: Center for Conservation Biology. Retrieved from http://www.ecovivero.org/calakmul.pdf

Geary, R. C. (1954). The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. The Incorporated Statistician, 5, 115-146. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2986645

Inegi. (2010). Conjunto de datos vectoriales de la carta de uso del suelo y vegetación: escala 1:250 000. Serie IV (continuo nacional). Aguascalientes, México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Recuperado de http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/usosuelo/

Lees, A. C., & Peres, C. A. (2009). Gap-crossing movements predict species occupancy in Amazonian forest fragments. Oikos, 118, 280-290. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16842.x

Legault, A., Chartendrault, V., Theuerkauf, J., Rouys, S., & Barre, N. (2011). Large-scale habitat selection by parrots in New Caledonia. Journal of Ornithology, 152, 409-419. doi: 10.1007/s10336-010-0602-0.

Macías, C. M., & Iñigo, E. E. (2003). Evaluación del estado de conservación actual de las poblaciones de loro cabeza amarilla (Amazona oratrix) en México (Informe final del proyecto AS002 apoyado por la Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, CONABIO). México, D. F.: Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. Retrieved from http://www.conabio.gob.mx/institucion/proyectos/resultados/InfAS002.pdf

Major, R. E., Christie, F. J., & Gowing, G. (2001). Influence of remnant and landscape attributes on Australian woodland bird communities. Biological Conservation, 102, 47-66. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00090-8

McGarigal, K., & Cushman, S. A. (2002). Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications, 12, 335-345. Retrieved from https://www.umass.edu/landeco/pubs/mcgarigal.cushman.2002.pdf

MacKinnon, B. (2005). Birds of Yucatan Peninsula. Cancún, México: Amigos de Sian Ka’an, AC.

Marín, M. C., Monterrubio, T. C., Renton, K., Rubio, Y., Macías, C., Cancino, R., & Ortega, J. M. (2012). Reduced current distribution of Psittacidae on the Mexican Pacific coast: potential impacts of habitat loss and capture for trade. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 451-473. doi: 10.1007/s10531-011-0193-y

Mateucci, S. D., & Silva, M. (2005). Selección de métricas de configuración espacial para la regionalización de un territorio antropizado. GeoFocus, 5, 180-202. Retrieved from http://www.geofocus.org/index.php/geofocus/article/view/65/233

Metzger, J. P., Camargo, A., Dixo, M., Bernacci, L. C., Ribeiro, M. C., Godoy, A. M., & Pardini, R. (2009). Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region. Biological Conservation, 142, 1166-1177. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.033

Miller, M. P., Bianchi, C. A., Mullins, T. D., & Haig, S. M. (2013). Associations between forest fragmentation patterns and genetic structure in Pfrimer’s Parakeet (Pyrrhura pfrimeri), an endangered endemic to central Brazil’s dry forests. Conservation Genetics, 14, 333-343. doi: 10.1007/s10592-012-0420-4

Monterrubio, T. C., & Escalante, P. (2006). Richness, distribution and conservation status of cavity nesting birds in Mexico. Biological Conservation, 128, 67-78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.017

Monterrubio, T. C., Ortega, J. M., & Marín, Ma. C. (2009). Nesting habitat of the Lilac-crowned Parrot in a modified landscape in Mexico. Biotropica, 41, 361-368. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00493.x

Morales, L., (2005). Evaluación de la abundancia poblacional y recursos alimenticios para tres géneros de psitácidos en hábitats conservados y perturbados de la costa de Jalisco, México (Tesis inédita de maestría). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, D.F., México.

Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37, 17-23. doi: 10.2307/2332142

Munshi, J., & Wilkinson, G. S. (2006). Diet influences life span in parrots (Psittaciformes). The Auk, 123, 108-118. Retrieved from http://www.life.umd.edu/faculty/wilkinson/South&Wilk06.pdf

Olah, G., Butchart, S. H. M., Symes, A., Medina, I., Cunningham, R., Brightsmith, D. J., & Heinsohn, R. (2016). Ecological and socio-economic factors affecting extinction risk in parrots. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25(2), 205-223. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-1036-z

Pennington, T. D., & Sarukhán, J. (1998). Árboles tropicales de México. Manual para la identificación de las principales especies. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ecología, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Plasencia, A. H., Escalona, G., & Esparza, L. G. (2014a). Modelación de la distribución geográfica potencial de dos especies de psitácidos neotropicales utilizando variables climáticas y topográficas. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 30, 471-490. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/azm/v30n3/v30n3a2.pdf

Plasencia, A. H., Escalona, G., & Esparza, L. G. (2014b). Interaction of landscape variables on the potential geographical distribution of parrots in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 37.2, 191-203. Retrieved from http://abc.museucienciesjournals.cat/files/ABC_37-2_pp_191-203.pdf

Plasencia, A. H., & Escalona, G. (2014a). Relative Abundance of Parrots throughout the Yucatan Peninsula: Implications for their Conservation. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 126, 759-766. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1676/13-206.1

Plasencia, A. H., & Escalona, G. (2014b). Caracterización del área de distribución geográfica potencial de las especies de aves psitácidas de la Península de Yucatán, México. Revista de Biología Tropical, 62, 1509-1522. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v62i4.13576

Renton, K. (2001). Lilac-Crowned Parrot diet and food resource availability: resource tracking by a parrot seed predator. The Condor, 103, 62-69. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0062:LCPDAF]2.0.CO;2

Renton, K., & Salinas, A. (2004). Climatic variability, nest predation, and reproductive output of lilac-crowned parrots (Amazona finschi) in tropical dry forest of western Mexico. The Auk, 121, 1214-1225. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[1214:CVNPAR]2.0.CO;2

Romero, K. G, Naranjo, E. J., Morales, H. H., & Nigh, R. B. (2006). Daños ocasionados por vertebrados silvestres al cultivo de maíz en la selva lacandona, Chiapas, México. Interciencia, 31(4), 276-283. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0378-18442006000400007

Roy, R., & Turner II, B. L. (2006). Reconciling agency and structure in empirical analysis: smallholder land use in the Southern Yucatán, Mexico. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 302-322. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00479.x

Sánchez, R., Ballari, S. A., Bucher, E. H., & Masello, J. F. (2016). Foraging by burrowing parrots has little impact on agricultural crops in northeastern Patagonia, Argentina. International Journal of Pest Management, 65, 1-10. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2016.1198061

Sawada, M. (1999). Technological tools. Rookcase: an Excel 97/2000 visual basic (VB) add-in for exploring global and local spatial autocorrelation. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 80, 231-234. doi/10.1890/0012-9623(1999)080%5b0231:TT%5d2.0.CO%3b2/epdf

Smith, A. C., Fahrig, L., & Francis, C. M. (2011). Landscape size affects the relative importance of habitat amount, habitat fragmentation, and matrix quality on forest birds. Ecography, 34, 103-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06201.x

Snyder, N., McGowan, P., Gilardi, J., & Grajal, A. (2000). Parrots. Status survey and conservation action plan 2000-2004. UK: IUCN/SSC Action Plans for the Conservation of Biological Diversity. Retrieved from https://www.parrots.org/publications-and-fact-sheets/parrot-action-plan

Tella, J. L., Dénes, F. V., Zulian, V., Prestes, N. P. Martínez, J., Blanco, G., & Hiraldo, F. 2016. Endangered plant-parrot mutualisms: seed tolerance to predation makes parrots pervasive dispersers of the Parana pine. Scientific Reports, 6, 1-11. doi: 10.1038/srep31709

Turner II, B. L., Geoghegan, J., & Foster, D. R. (2004). Integrated land-change science and tropical deforestation in the Southern Yucatán: Final Frontiers. United Kimgdom: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://bibliotecasibe.ecosur.mx/sibe/book/000032695

Uezu, A., & Metzger, J. P. 2016. Time-lag in responses of birds to Atlantic forest fragmentation: restoration opportunity and urgency. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0147909. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147909

Vester, H. F. M., Lawrence, D., Eastman, J. R., Turner II, B. L., Calmé, S., Dickson, R., … Sangerman, F. (2007). Land change in the Southern Yucatán and Calakmul Biosphere Reserve: effects on habitat and biodiversity. Ecological Applications, 17, 989-1003. doi: 10.1890/05-1106

Villalobos, G. J., & Mendoza, J. (2010). La Biodiversidad en Campeche: Estudio de Estado. Campeche, México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), Gobierno del Estado de Campeche, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, México. Recuperado de http://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/region/EEB/pdf/Biodiversidad_Campeche_baja.pdf

Visco, D. M., Michel, N. L., Boyle, W. A., Sigel, B. J., Woltmann, S., & Sherry, T. W. (2015). Patterns and causes of understory bird declines in human-disturbed tropical forest landscapes: A case study from Central America. Biological Conservation, 191, 117-129. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.018

XLSTAT. (2013). Software, Version 2013.1. Copyright Addinsoft 1995-2013. Retrieved from http://www.xlstat.com/es/

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Biología Tropical

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.