Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
Algunos aspectos de anatomía foliar comparada de dos especies de Bromeliaceae (Aechmea mexicana Baker y Hechtia glomerata Zucc.)
PDF (Español (España))

How to Cite

Flores, E. M. (1975). Algunos aspectos de anatomía foliar comparada de dos especies de Bromeliaceae (Aechmea mexicana Baker y Hechtia glomerata Zucc.). Revista De Biología Tropical, 23(1), 29–52. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/26015

Abstract

The leaf anatomy of two Bromeliaceae, Hechtia glomerata Zucc., a terrestrial xerophyte of arid zones, and Aechmea mexicana Baker, a tropical moist forest epiphyte, is compared; these species show adaptations to different extremes of adverse environmental conditions as to water uptake. The leaves of A. mexicana have more water storage tissue than those of H. glomerata; on the other hand, H. glomerata is capable of root absorption. In A. mexicana, modified nonfunctional stomata increase transpiration resistance. Also, this species shows more specialized foliar trichomes which permit the uptake of water and possibly of nutrients. The balance between transpiration and absorption rates is regulated in both species by the combined presence of peltate scales and stomata. The degree of adaptation to drought presented by epiphytic species is more complicated than that shown by terrestrial species. Epiphytic plants like A. mexicana may be derived from xerophytic species that have undergone readaptation to a humid climate. The conspicuous negative geotropism in the leaves of A. mexicana causes the formation of basal deposits of water, which play an important functional role in survival.

PDF (Español (España))

References

ANDRÉ, E. 1889. Description et histoire des Broméliacées. G. Maisson, París. 40 pp.

ARENS, K. 1956. Consideracoes sobre as causas do xeromorfismo foliar. Bol. Fac. Filos. Univ. Sáo Pauto, Bot., 13: 25-53.

BEER, J. G. 1854. Versuch einer Bluethenstand. Eintheilung der Familie der Bromeliaceen na eh . deren Oesterr. Bot. Wochenbl., 4: 157-160.

BENZING, D. H. 1970. Ah investigation of two bromeliad myrmecophytes: TiIlandsia butzii y T. caputmedusae E. Morren and their ants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 97: 109-115.

BROWN, H. T., & F. ESCOMBE 1900. Static diffusion of gases and liquids in relation to the assimilation of carbon and translocation of plants. Philos. Trans. Ser. B., 193: 223-228.

COLLINS, J. L. 1960. The pineapple. Interscience Publ., New York. 294 pp.

COUTINHO, J. M. 1959. Contribucao ao conhecimento da ecologia da mata pluvial tropical. Bol. Fac. Pilos. Univ. Sao Pauto, Bot., 16: 1-219.

CHEVALIER, CH. 1935. Les Broméliacées-Aechmeinées. Bull. Soc. Natl. Host. France, 6: 190-208.

DUVAL, L. 1806. Les Broméliacées. J. Lamarre, Paris. 150 pp.

FRANKE, W. 1967. Mechanisms of foliar penetration of solutions. Ann. Rev. PI. Physiol., 18: 281-300.

HEATH, O. V., & T. A. MANSFIELD 1969. The movements of stomata in the physiology of plant growth and development. p. 303-331. In : M. Wilkins (ed.), The physiology of plants. McGraw-Hill, Londres.

KAMP, E. 1930. Die Bromeliaceen. Jahrb. Wiu. Bol., 72: 403-428.

KOCK, E. 1858. Die Bromeliaceen mit dreitheilige Kapseln. Allg. Garlnerzlg. 26: 265-300.

LINSBAUER, K. 1911. Zür physiologischen Anatomie der Epidermis und des Durchluftungsapparates der Brome!iaceen. Sitzungsber. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiu., Math.-Naturwiss Cl., Abl. 1, 120: 319-348.

MARTIN, J. T., & B. E. JUNIPER 1970. The cuticle of plants. Arnold, London. 347 pp.

MEZ, C. 1896. Bromeliaceae, p. 702-742. In: C. De Candolle, (ed.), Monographiae Phanerogamarum, IX. Masson et Cie., Paris. 1028 pp.

O'BRIEN, T. P. 1970. Further observations on hydrolisis of the cell wall in the xylem. Protoplasma, 69: 1-14.

OSMOND, C. B., U. LUTTGE, K. R. WEST, C. K. PALLAGHY, B. SHACHER-HILL 1969. Ion absortion in Alriplex leaf tissue II. Secretion of ions to epidermal bladders. Austral. J. Biol. Sci., 22: 797-814.

PICADO, C. 1913. Sur les Broméliacées épiphyles considerées comme milieu biologique. These doctoral. Université de Paris, France.

PIENIAZAEK, S. A. 1944. Physical characters of the skin in relation to apple fruit transpiration. Pl. Physiol., Lancaster, 19: 529-536.

PITTENDRlGH, C. S. 1948. The bromeliad-Anopheles·malaria complex in Trinidad. I. The bromeliad flora. Evolución, 2: 58-59.

ROBINSON, H. 1969. A monograph on foliar anatomy of the genera Connellia, Cottendorfia and Navia (Bromeliaceae). Smilhsonian Contr. Bol., 2: 1-42.

RUINEN, J. 1956. The phyllosphere of leaves. Nature, 9: 177-220.

RZEDOWSKI, J. 1961. Vegetación del Estado de San Luis Potosí. Tesis doctoral. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.

SCHIEFERSTEIN, R. H., W. E. LOOMIS 1959. Development of the cuticular layers in angiosperm leaves. Amer. J. Bol., 46: 625-635.

SCHIMPER, E. 1894. Ueber Bau und Lebensweise der Epiphyten Westindiens. Bot. Zbl., 17: 192-195.

SLATYER, R. O. 1967. Plant-water relationships. Academic Press. New York. 237 pp.

SOLEREDER. H. & F. S. MEYER 1929. Bromeliaceae, I. Systematische Anatomi, der Monocotyledonen. IV. Berlín. 129 pp.

TIETZE, M. 1906. Physiologische Bromeliaceen-studien. II. Die Entwickelung der wasseraufnehmenden Bromeliaceen-Trichome. Naturwissenschaften. 78: 1-51.

TOMLINSON. P. B. 1969. Anatomy of Monocotyledons. III. Commelinales- Zingiberales. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 446 pp.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 1975 Revista de Biología Tropical

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.