Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
Uso y selección de microhábitat en un ensamble de anuros del Chaco Serrano de Argentina
PDF
HTML

Palabras clave

anfibios
partición de recursos
Rhinella
Pleurodema
Leptodactylus
Odontophrynus
plasticidad
amphibians
resource
partitioning
Rhinella
Pleurodema
Leptodactylus
Odontophrynus
plasticity

Cómo citar

Nieva Cocilio, R. A., Acosta, J. C., & Blanco, G. M. (2020). Uso y selección de microhábitat en un ensamble de anuros del Chaco Serrano de Argentina. Revista De Biología Tropical, 68(3), 862–872. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v68i3.40390

Resumen

Introduction: Research on spatial resource usage and partition strategies is important to understand the mechanisms of coexistence in sympatric amphibian species, even more when there are temporal variations in habitat availability. Objective: To learn about the patterns of microhabitat use, its seasonal variations and the possible influence of phylogeny on an anuran assembly of the Chaco Serrano in Argentina. Methods: Samplings were carried out in the Valle Fértil Natural Park protected area, Valle Fértil Department, San Juan, between 2012 and 2017. In the field, we recorded the microhabitat where each specimen was found, and we also measured site variables. In addition, microhabitats availability was determined. Data were analyzed using Manly’s selectivity index. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to assess temporal variations in microhabitat use. Results: The species evaluated were: Rhinella arenarum arenarum, Leptodactylus latrans, Pleurodema tucumanum and Odontophrynus occidentalis. All species showed differences in usage frequencies: R. a. arenarum showed preferences for rocky and aquatic sites, P. tucumanum showed preferences towards bare soil and rocky sites, L. latrans and O. occidentalis showed greater preferences for rocky and aquatic sites. All species but Odontophrynus exhibited seasonal variations in microhabitat selection and usage. Odontophrynus occidentalis showed differences in usage proportions among microhabitats. Conclusions: This study shows plasticity in microhabitat usage as an important determinant of anuran spatial distribution, without apparent restrictions imposed by space competition or phylogeny. When species activity is coincident, the space resource may be distributed in a way that species overlap is reduced.

https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v68i3.40390
PDF
HTML

Citas

Afonso, L.G., & Eterovick, P.C. (2007). Microhabitat choice and differential use by anurans in forest streams in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History, 41(13-16), 937-948.

Almeida-Gomes, M., Hatano, F.H., van Sluys, M., & Rocha, C.F.D. (2007). Diet and microhabitat use by two Hylodinae species (Anura, Cycloramphidae) living in sympatry and syntopy in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest area. Iheringia Série Zoologia, 97, 27-30.

Baber, J.M., Fleishman, E., Babbitt, K.J., & Tarr, T.L. (2004). The relationship between wetland hydroperiod and nestedness patterns in assemblages of larval amphibians and predatory macroinvertebrates. Oikos, 107(1), 16-27.

Begon, M., Harper, L.J., & Townsend, C.R. (1997). Ecología. Individuos, poblaciones y comunidades. Barcelona, España: Ediciones Omega, S.A.

Berg, C. (1896). Batracios Argentinos. Enumeración sistemática, sinonímica y bibliográfica de los batracios de la República Argentina. Annales Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, 5(2), 147-226.

Beyer, H.L., Haydon, D.T., Morales, J.M., Frair, J.L., Hebblewhite, M., Mitchell, M., & Matthiopoulos, J. (2010). The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365(1550), 2245-2254.

Brown, A.D., & Pacheco, S. (2006). Propuesta de actualización del mapa ecorregional de la Argentina. En A.D. Brown, U. Martínez Ortíz, M. Acerbi, & J. Corcuera. La situación ambiental argentina 2005 (pp. 28-31). Argentina: Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina.

Cei, J.M. (1980). Amphibians of Argentina (Vol. 2). Monitore Zoologico Italiano. Nuova Serie, Monographia, 2, 1-609.

de Oliveira, F.F.R., & Eterovick, P.C. (2010). Patterns of spatial distribution and microhabitat use by syntopic anuran species along permanent lotic ecosystems in the Cerrado of southeastern Brazil. Herpetologica, 66(2), 159-171.

Duellman, W.E. & Trueb, L. (1994). Biology of Amphibians. Londres: John Hopkins University Press Ltd. London.

Duré, M.I., & Kehr, A.I. (2004). Influence of microhabitat on the trophic ecology of two leptodactylids from northeastern Argentina. Herpetologica, 60(3), 295-303.

Duré, M.I., Kehr, A.I., Schaefer, E.F., & Marangoni, F. (2008). Diversity of amphibians in rice fields from northeastern Argentina. Interciencia, 33(7), 528-531.

Eterovick, P.C., Rievers, C.R., Kopp, K., Wachlevski, M., Franco, B.P., Dias, C.J., Barata, I.M., Ferreira, A.D.M., & Afonso, L.G. (2010). Lack of phylogenetic signal in the variation in anuran microhabitat use in southeastern Brazil. Evolutionary Ecology, 24(1), 1-24.

Freiberg, M.A. (1942). Enumeración sistemática y distribución geográfica de los batracios argentinos. Physis, 19, 219-240.

Gillespie, G.R., Lockie, D., Scroggie, M.P., & Iskandar, D.T. (2004). Habitat use by stream-breeding frogs in south-east Sulawesi, with some preliminary observations on community organization. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20, 439-448.

Hecnar, S.J., Casper, G.S., Russell, R.W., Hecnar, D.R., & Robinson, J.N. (2002). Nested species assemblages of amphibians and reptiles in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 475-489.

Hensel, R. (1867). Beiträge zur kenntniss der Wirbelthiere Südbrasiliens. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 33(1), 120-162.

Heyer, W.R., Donnelly, M.A., McDiarmid, R.W., Hayek, L.C., & Foster, M.S. (2001). Medición y Monitoreo de la Diversidad Biológica. Métodos Estandarizados Para Anfibios. Argentina: Editorial Universidad de La Patagonia.

Johnson, C.J., Nielsen, S.E., Merrill, E.H., McDonald, T.L., & Boyce, M.S. (2006). Resource selection functions based on use-availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods. Journal of Wildlife Manage, 70, 347-357.

Kacoliris, F.P., Williams, J.D., Quiroga, S., Molinari, A., & Vicente, N. (2011). Ampliación del conocimiento sobre uso de hábitat en Liolaemus multimaculatus, sitios de fuga. Cuadernos de Herpetología, 25(1), 5-10.

Law, B.S. & Dickman, C.R. (1998). The use of habitat mosaic by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity Conservation, 7, 323-333.

Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (Tomus I). Salvius. Holmiae: Editio decima, reformata.

Manly, B.F.J., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L., & Erickson, E.P. (2002). Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis of field studies (2a Ed.). The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.

Márquez, J. (1999). Las Áreas Protegidas de la Provincia de San Juan. Multequina, 8, 1-10.

Martin, J., & Salvador, A. (1995). Microhabitat selection by the Iberian rock lizard Lacerta monticola: Effects on density and spatial distribution of individuals. Biological Conservation 79, 303-307.

Mesquita, D.O., Colli, G.R., França, F.G., & Vitt, L.J. (2006). Ecology of a Cerrado lizard assemblage in the Jalapão region of Brazil. Copeia, 3, 460-471.

Montero, R., & Autino, A.G. 2018. Sistemática y filogenia de los vertebrados, con énfasis en la fauna argentina (3a Ed.). San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina: Editorial independiente.

Muñoz-Guerrero, J., Serrano, V.H., & Ramírez-Pinilla, M.P. (2007). Uso de Microhábitat, Dieta y Tiempo de Actividad en Cuatro Especies Simpátricas de Ranas Hílidas Neotropicales (Anura: Hylidae). Caldasia, 29(2), 413-425.

Navas, C. (1996). The effect of temperature on the vocal activity of tropical anurans: a comparison of high and low-elevation species. Journal of Herpetology, 30, 488-497.

Navas, C. (2003). Herpetological diversity along Andean elevational gradients: links with physiological ecology and evolutionary physiology. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 133, 469-485.

Parris, K.M. (2004). Environmental and spatial variables influence the composition of frog assemblages in subtropical eastern Australia. Ecography, 27, 392-400.

Pereyra, L.C., Lescano, J.N., & Leynaud, G.C. (2011). Breeding-site selection by red-belly toads, Melanophryniscus stelzneri (Anura: Bufonidae), in Sierras of Córdoba, Argentina. Amphibia-Reptilia, 32, 105-112.

Poblete, G.A., & Ruiz, S.B. (2006). Las estaciones térmicas en el Valle de Tulum. UNSJ. FCEFN. Revista Ciencias, 1, 34-42.

Ponssa, M.L. (2004). Utilización espacial y temporal de una comunidad de anuros de Kent’s Marsh (Gamboa, Panamá). Revista Española de Herpetología, 18, 5-18.

R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Recuperado de http://www.R-project.org/

Rodriguez Muñoz, M.J., Martínez, T.A., Acosta, J.C., & Blanco, G.M. (2019). Foam nest construction and first report of agonistic behaviour in Pleurodema tucumanum (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Neotropical Biology and Conservation, 14(1), 117-128.

Sanabria, E., Quiroga, L., & Acosta, J.C. (2005). Patrones de actividad temporal, estacional y uso de microhábitat de una población de adultos de Bufo arenarum, en los humedales de Zonda, San Juan, Argentina. Boletín de la Sociedad Herpetológica Mexicana, 13(2), 61-65.

Simon, M.P., & Toft, C.A. (1991). Diet specialization in small vertebrates: Mite eating in Frogs. Oikos, 61, 263-278.

Smith, G., & Ballinger, R. (2001). The Ecological Consequences of Habitat and Microhabitat Use in Lizards: a review. Contemporary Herpetology, 3, 1-37.

Stellatelli, O.A., & Vega, L.E. (2010). Estructura del ensamble de anuros de la Reserva Integral Laguna de los Padres (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Cuadernos de Herpetología, 24(2), 111-122.

Toft, C. (1980). Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecologia, 45, 131-141.

Toft, C.A. (1985). Resource partitioning in amphibians and reptiles. Copeia, 1, 1-21.

Tracy, C.R. (1976). Model of dynamic exchanges of water and energy between a terrestrial amphibian and its environment. Ecological Monographs, 46, 293-326.

Vargas, F., & Castro, F.H. (1999). Distribución y preferencias de microhabitat en anuros (Amphibia) en bosque maduro y áreas perturbadas en Anchicayá, Pacífico Colombiano. Caldasia, 21, 95-109.

Vitt, L.J., & Caldwell, J.P. (2009). Herpetology, An Introductory Biology of Amphibians & Reptiles (3a Ed.). Academic Press.

Wachlevski, M., De Souza, P.H., Kopp, K., & Eterovick, P.C. (2008). Microhabitat use and feeding habits of Crossodactylus bokermanni Caramaschi and Sazima, (Anura, Hylodidae) at a site in south‐eastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History, 42(19-20), 1421-1434.

Wilbur, H.M. (1987). Regulation of structure in complex systems: experimental temporary pond communities. Ecology, 68(5), 1437-1452.

Zimmerman, B.L., & Simberloff, D. (1996). An historical interpretation of habitat use by frogs in a central Amazonian forest. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 27-46

Zorro Ceron, J.P. (2007). Anuros de piedemonte llanero: diversidad y preferencias de microhábitat (Trabajo final de Licenciatura). Pontífica Universidad Javierana, Colombia.

Comentarios

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2020 Recepción RBT, Rodrigo Nieva Cocilio, Rodrigo Nieva Cocilio

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.