Versiones
- January 24, 2022 (4)
- November 11, 2022 (3)
- November 11, 2022 (2)
- November 11, 2022 (1)
Palabras clave
afforestation
biodiversity
bioindicators.
colombian altillanura
land use change
Bioindicador, Biodiversidad, Forestación, Altillanura Colombiana, cambio de uso del suelo
altillanura colombiana
biodiversidad
bioindicador
cambio de uso del suelo
forestación
Cómo citar
Resumen
Introducción: Una actividad económica que ha tenido auge en la última década en el altiplano colombiano es la forestación de sabanas con alteraciones antrópicas, pero se desconoce su papel en la conservación de las mariposas frugívoras de los bosques de galería dentro de los núcleos forestales. Objetivo: Comparar la diversidad de mariposas frugívoras en plantaciones de eucalipto y bosques de galería, y el papel de las variables ambientales. Métodos: Utilizamos trampas Van Someren-Rydon, dos réplicas de cuatro trampas, en cada uno de los cuatro hábitats muestreados simultáneamente desde diciembre 2020 hasta julio 2021: plantación de eucaliptos de cuatro años; plantación de eucaliptos de seis años; bosque de galería de suelo seco y bosque de galería anegado. También registramos diez variables abióticas, estructurales, alimentarias y de hábitat. Resultados: Recolectamos 227 especímenes de mariposas frugívoras (30 especies, 23 géneros y 5 subfamilias de la familia Nymphalidae). Había más especies en los bosques. Las especies de mariposas variaron más del 50 % entre los hábitats; Satyrinae fue más diversa en las plantaciones. Conclusión: La forestación en esta área proporciona hábitats para algunas especies de mariposas frugívoras de los remanentes de bosques naturales adyacentes. Las forestaciones representan un escenario de alteración intermedia entre las dos unidades de paisaje dominantes en la región.
Citas
Agudelo-Martínez, J. C., Gómez-Tapia, E. M., & Pérez-Buitrago, N. (2018). Dinámica temporal de la riqueza de especies y la abundancia de mariposas frugívoras (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) en la sabana inundable del municipio de Arauca (Colombia). Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 42(164), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.672
Barbosa, C., De Vasconcelos, E. N., Mariano-Neto, R., Viana, E. F., & Márcio, B. Z. C. (2017). Positive forestry: The effect of rubber tree plantations on fruit feeding butterfly assemblages in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 397, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.04.043
Barlow, J., Araujo, I. S., Overal, W. L., Gardner, T. A., Da Silva Mendes, F., Lake, I. R., & Peres, C. A. (2008). Diversity and composition of fruit-feeding butterflies in tropical Eucalyptus plantations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(5), 1089–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9240-0
Barlow, J., Gardner, T. A., Araujo, I. S., Ávila-Pires, T. C., Bonaldo, A. B., Costa, J. E., Esposito, M. C., Ferreira, L. V., Hawes, J., Hernandez, M. I. M., Hoogmoed, M. S., Leite, R. N., Lo-Man-Hung, N. F., Malcolm, J. R., Martins, M. B., Mestre, L. A. M., Miranda-Santos, R., Nunes-Gutjahr, A. L., Overal, W. L., … Peres, C. A. (2007b). Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(47), 18555–18560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703333104
Barlow, J., Gardner, T. A., Araujo, I. S., Avila-Pires, T. C., Bonaldo, A. B., Costa, J. E., Esposito, M. C., Ferreira, L. V., Hawes, J., Hernandez, M. I. M., Hoogmoed, M. S., Leite, R. N., Lo-Man-Hung, N. F., Malcolm, J. R., Martins, M. B., Mestre, L. A. M., Miranda-Santos, R., Nunes-Gutjahr, A. L., Overal, W. L., … Peres, C. A. (2012). Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Stubborn Roots: Race, Culture, and Inequality in U.S. and South African Schools, 104(47), 1–256. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703333104
Barlow, J., Overal, W. L., Araujo, I. S., Gardner, T. A., & Peres, C. A. (2007a). The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44(5), 1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01347.x
Baselga, A., & Orme, C. D. L. (2012). Betapart: An R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(5), 808–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00224.x
Beccaloni, G. W., Viloria, Á. L., Hall, S. K., & Robinson, G. S. (2008). Catalogue of the hostplants of the Neotropical butterflies / Catálogo de las plantas huésped de las mariposas neotropicales. Monografías Tercer Milenio.
Bobo, K. S., Waltert, M., Fermon, H., Njokagbor, J., & Mühlenberg, M. (2006). From forest to farmland: Butterfly diversity and habitat associations along a gradient of forest conversion in Southwestern Cameroon. Journal of Insect Conservation, 10(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-005-8564-x
Borralho, N., & Nieto, V. M. (2012). Eucalyptus para la Orinoquia : retos y oportunidades. Revista M&M, 75(May), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4547.7280
Brockerhoff, E. G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J. A., Quine, C. P., & Sayer, J. (2008). Plantation forests and biodiversity: Oxymoron or opportunity? Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(5), 925–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x
Brockerhoff, E. G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J. A., & Ferraz, S. F. B. (2013). Role of eucalypt and other planted forests in biodiversity conservation and the provision of biodiversity-related ecosystem services. Forest Ecology and Management, 301, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.018
Charney, N., & Record, S. (2015). Jost diversity measures for community data. Package ‘vegetarian.’ R Packag 23–3 (Issue 1). cran.r-project.org/%0Aweb/packages/veget
Connell, J. H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199(6), 1302–1310. https://doi.org/10.2307/4081809
Cordero-Rivera, A., Martínez Álvarez, A., & Álvarez, M. (2017). Eucalypt plantations reduce the diversity of macroinvertebrates in small forested streams. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 40(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2017.40.0087
De Cáceres, M., & Legendre, P. (2009). Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference. Ecology, 90(12), 3566–3574. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1
De Cáceres, M., Legendre, P., & Moretti, M. (2010). Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos, 119(10), 1674–1684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18334.x
DeVries, P. J., Alexander, L. G., Chacon, I. A., & Fordyce, J. A. (2012). Similarity and difference among rainforest fruit-feeding butterfly communities in Central and South America. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81(2), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01922.x
DeVries, P. J., Hamm, C. A., & Fordyce, J. A. (2016). A standardized sampling protocol for fruit-feeding butterflies (Nymphalidae). In T. H. Larsen (Ed.), Core Standardized Methods for Rapid Biological Field Assessment (pp. 140–148). Conservation International.
Dufrêne, M., & Legendre, P. (1997). Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, 67(3), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2963459
Felton, A., Nilsson, U., Sonesson, J., Felton, A. M., Roberge, J. M., Ranius, T., Ahlström, M., Bergh, J., Björkman, C., Boberg, J., Drössler, L., Fahlvik, N., Gong, P., Holmström, E., Keskitalo, E. C. H., Klapwijk, M. J., Laudon, H., Lundmark, T., Niklasson, M., … Wallertz, K. (2016). Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden. Ambio, 45, 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0749-2
Fermon, H., Waltert, M., Vane-Wright, R. I., & Mühlenberg, M. (2005). Forest use and vertical stratification in fruit-feeding butterflies of Sulawesi, Indonesia: Impacts for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(2), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-5354-9
García-Suabita, W., Pinzón, J., Spence, J. R., & Florián, O. P. P. (2019). Epiedaphic Ground Beetle (Carabidae) Diversity in Ecosystems Transformed by Plantations of Eucalyptus pellita in the Orinoco Region of Colombia. Neotropical Entomology, 48(6), 1014–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-019-00700-w
Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2), 427–432.
Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H., & Chao, A. (2016). iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(12), 1451-1456 https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12613
Jost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113(2), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
Jost, L. (2007). Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology, 88(10), 2427-39. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1736.1
Junqueira, L., Diehl, E., & Filho, E. (2008). Termites in eucalyptus forest plantations and forest remnants: an ecological approach. Bioikos, 22(1), 3–14.
Livingston, G., Jha, S., Vega, A., & Gilbert, L. (2013). Conservation Value and Permeability of Neotropical Oil Palm Landscapes for Orchid Bees. PLoS ONE, 8(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078523
Lourenço, G. M., Soares, G. R., Santos, T. P., Dáttilo, W., Freitas, A. V. L., & Ribeiro, S. P. (2019). Equal but different: Natural ecotones are dissimilar to anthropic edges. PLoS ONE, 14(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213008
Lucci Freitas, A. V., Agra Iserhard, C., Pereira Santos, J., Oliveira CarreiraI, J. Y., Bandini Ribeiro, D., Alves Melo, D. H., Batista Rosa, A. H., Marini-filho, O. J., Mattos Accacio, G., & Uehara-prado, M. (2014). Studies with butterfly bait traps: an overview. Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 40(2), 203–212.
Martín-Regalado, N. (2019). Detección de especies indicadoras de condiciones de hábitats. En C. E. Moreno (Ed.), La Biodiversidad en un mundo cambiante: Fundamentos teóricos y metodológicos para su estudio (pp. 223–235). Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Libermex.
Nogueira, V. R., Barbosa Cambui, E. C., Mariano-Neto, E., Da Rocha, P. L. B., & Cardoso, M. Z. (2019). The role of Eucalyptus planted forests for fruit-feeding butterflies’ conservation in fragmented areas of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 432, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.017
Norfolk, O., Asale, A., Temesgen, T., Denu, D., Platts, P. J., Marchant, R., & Yewhalaw, D. (2017). Diversity and composition of tropical butterflies along an Afromontane agricultural gradient in the Jimma Highlands, Ethiopia. Biotropica, 49(3), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12421
Oksanen, A. J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Mcglinn, D., Minchin, P. R., Hara, R. B. O., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., & Szoecs, E. (2016). Vegan: community ecology package, R package version 2.0–10. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf
Pinzón, O. P., Hernández, A. M., & Malagón, L. A. (2012). Diversidad de termitas (Isoptera: Termitidae, Rhinotermitidae) en plantaciones de caucho en Puerto López (Meta, Colombia). Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 38(2), 291–298.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Ramos, F. A. (2000). Nymphalid butterfly communities in an amazonian forest fragment. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera, 35, 29–41.
Ribeiro, D. B., & Freitas, A. V. L. (2012). The effect of reduced-impact logging on fruit-feeding butterflies in Central Amazon, Brazil. Journal of Insect Conservation, 16(5), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9458-3
Rivera, L. F., Armbrecht, I., & Calle, Z. (2013). Silvopastoral systems and ant diversity conservation in a cattle-dominated landscape of the Colombian Andes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 181, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.011
Roberts, D. W. (2007). labdsv: ordination and multivariate analysis for ecology. R package version 1.3-1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/labdsv/index.html
Schulze, C. H., Linsenmair, K. E., & Fiedler, K. (2001). Understorey versus Canopy : Patterns of Vertical Stratification and Diversity among Lepidoptera in a Bornean Rain Forest. Plant Ecology, 153(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017589711553
Schulze, C. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., & Tscharntke, T. (2004). Effects of Land Use on Butterfly Communities at the Rain Forest Margin: A Case Study from Central Sulawesi. In G. Gerold, M. Fremery & E. Guhardja (Eds.), Land Use, Nature Conservation and the Stability of Rainforest Margins in Southeast Asia (pp. 281–297). Springer-Verlag.
Secco, L. D., & Pirard, R. (2015). Do tree plantations support forest conservation ? CIFOR Infobrief, 110.
Tavares, A., Beiroz, W., Fialho, A., Frazão, F., Macedo, R., Louzada, J., & Audino, L. (2019). Eucalyptus plantations as hybrid ecosystems: Implications for species conservation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 433, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.063
Uehara-Prado, M., Brown, K. S., & Freitas, A. V. L. (2006). Species richness, composition and abundance of fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: comparison between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 43–54 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822x.2006.00267.x
Comentarios
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Biología Tropical