EL FILIBUSTERISMO EN LOS MENSAJES AL CONGRESO DE LOS PRESIDENTES DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS Y LA LEY DE NEUTRALIDAD 1848-1860

Authors

  • Carmen María Fallas Santana Universidad de Costa Rica Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/dre.v12i2.6357

Keywords:

Filibustering, Neutrality Act, United States, William Walker, Nicaragua, Costa Rica

Abstract

This article analyzes the approach to filibustering in the annual presidential messages to Congress in the period between the end of the Mexican American War and the beginning of the Civil War. It argues that all administrations committed themselves to suppress filibustering because it was detrimental to the commercial, political and economic interests, to national security and to foreign relations.  It points out that the rejection of the petitions made by the governments of Nicaragua and Costa Rica to stop the organization and departure of William Walker’s filibustering expeditions cast a shadow of doubt on the U.S.  government’s commitment to enforce the Neutrality Act of 1818 that prohibited them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Carmen María Fallas Santana, Universidad de Costa Rica

    Doctora en Historia.  Docente en la Escuela de Historia y en la Escuela de Estudios Generales de la Universidad de Costa Rica.  Investigadora del CIHAC en el Programa de Historia Política de 2002 a 2009.

Downloads

Published

2011-11-12

Issue

Section

History of Latin America

How to Cite

EL FILIBUSTERISMO EN LOS MENSAJES AL CONGRESO DE LOS PRESIDENTES DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS Y LA LEY DE NEUTRALIDAD 1848-1860. (2011). Diálogos. Revista Electrónica De Historia, 12(2), 70-97. https://doi.org/10.15517/dre.v12i2.6357

Similar Articles

1-10 of 39

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.