Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explain the use of indirect supervision as a control mechanism used by the franchisors for assuring standards and quality of service in the franchise framework, and to examine their presence under the agency and transaction cost theories. A qualitative research was developed based on 10 studies case of units franchised from national and foreign origin established in Venezuela. The results obtained showed (a) the preeminence of the contract as the general basis of the existence of different control mechanisms, (b) in application of the same contract, the use of forms of control are not necessarily specified, (c) the similar perception of effectiveness by franchisees in accordance to the controls applied by way of indirect supervision, and (d) the perceived variability in relations to the pleasure by the franchisees for the use of different mechanisms by way of indirect supervision.
References
Bonache, J. (1999): “El Estudio de Casos como Estrategia de Construcción Teórica: Características, Críticas y Defensas”. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 3, 123-140.
Coase, R. H. (1937): “La Naturaleza de la Empresa”, en Coase, R. H. (1994): La Empresa, el Mercado y la Ley, Alianza Economía.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989): “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review”. Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), pp. 57-74.
Fernández de Arroyabe, J. y Arranz, N. (1999). La Cooperación Entre Empresas. Análisis y Diseño. ESIC Editorial, Madrid.
Gibson, J., Ivancevich, J. y James Donelly (1996). Las Organizaciones. Comportamiento, Estructura y Procesos. McGraw Hill, Octava edición.
Grunow, D. (1995): “The Research Design in Organization Studies: Problems and Prospects”. Organization Science, 6 (1): 93-103.
Jensen, M. y Meckling, W. (1976): “The Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp. 305-360.
Mariz, R. y García, M. (2005): “An Empirical Evaluation of Franchise Contracting Provisions in Spanish Chains”. International Business & Economic Research Journal, Vol. 4, nº 1, pp. 49-60.
Milgrom, P. y Roberts, J. (1992): Economics, Organizations and Management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Olmos, A. y Rivas, V. (2004). Revista Venezolana de Análisis de Coyuntura, Vol. X, No. 1, Ene-Jun., pp. 251-275.
Ouchi, W. (1977): “The Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 (1): 129-141.
Ouchi, W. (1979): “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanism”. Management Science, 25 (9): 833-848.
Ouchi, W. y Maguire, M. (1975): “Organizational Control: Two Functions”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20 (4): 559-569.
Raab, S. y Matusky, G. (2006). Franquicias: Cómo Multiplicar su Negocio. Editorial Limusa. México.
Sánchez, R., Suárez, I. y Luis Vázquez (2008). El Diseño Contractual de la Relación de Franquicia. Universia Business Review, tercer trimestre. ISSN: 1698-5117.
SPPLC (1999). Superintendencia para la Promoción y Protección de la Libre Competencia. Resolución Número SPPLC-038-99. Caracas, 9 de julio de 1999 - Años 189 y 140.
Williamson, O. (1981): “The Economics of the Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach”. American Journal of Sociology, 3, pp. 548-577.
Yin, R. (1989): Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. (1994): Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright (c) 2010 Alberto Mirabal Martínez , Luis Sigala Paparella
