Keywords
Dignity
Man
Moral
Quality
Humanity
How to Cite
Abstract
The question about the meaning of being a person has been present throughout the history of humanity, with great concern arising in investigating the origin of the human being, the qualities that make it different from other living beings, among other concerns. For this reason, the present work aims to construct a general review of the concept of person, a central theme in the philosophy of Robert Spaemann. To do this, it is important to review his thought on topics about the nature of being, the reasons why he considers every man as a person and the exclusive qualities of this same one.
References
Agulló Cantos, Pedro. 2022. “La Ética de la Benevolencia de Robert Spaemann en su Contexto
Sistémico y Consecuencialista. Algunas Cuestiones Aplicadas.” Tesis Doctoral, Murcia,
España: Universidad de Murcia. http://hdl.handle.net/10201/124545.
Agustín, San. 2003. Las Confesiones. Madrid: Akal.
Pro Velasco, Ma Luisa. 2021. Introducción a La Ética de Robert Spaemann. Filosofía Hoy 82.
Granada: Editorial Comares.
Spaemann, Robert. 1970a. «Confianza.» Revista Empresa y Humanismo IX, 131–48.
https://doi.org/10.15581/015.8.33333.
Spaemann, Robert. 970b. «¿Es Todo Ser Humano Una Persona?» Traducido por Ezequiel Coquet.
Persona y Derecho, no. 37, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.15581/011.32013.
Spaemann, Robert. «Sobre el concepto de dignidad humana.» Persona y Derecho, no. 19,
–33. https://doi.org/10.15581/011.32580.
Spaemann, Robert. 2000a. Happiness and Benevolence. London: University of Notre Dame.
Spaemann, Robert. 2000b. Personas: acerca de la distinción entre “algo” y “alguien.” 1. ed. Colección
filosófica 155. Pamplona: EUNSA.
Spaemann, Robert. 2010. Essays in Anthropology: Variations on a Theme. Traducido por Guido de Graaff
and James Mumford. Eugene, Or: Cascade Books.
Spaemann, Robert. 2014. Sobre Dios y el mundo: una autobiografía dialogada. Madrid: Palabra.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica