Comprendiendo la nada quántica gracias a las lógicas no-clásicas: Relevancia de la lógica libre
PDF
HTML

Palabras clave

Vacío
Dirac
Lo real y lo posible
Mecánica cuántica
Representación y objetividad

Cómo citar

Maldonado, Carlos Eduardo. 2026. “Comprendiendo La Nada quántica Gracias a Las lógicas No-clásicas: Relevancia De La lógica Libre”. Revista De Filosofía De La Universidad De Costa Rica 65 (171). https://doi.org/10.15517/revfil.2026.2656.

Resumen

A partir del artículo de 1930 de Dirac sobre la teoría de electrones y protones, la pregunta acerca de la nada ha permeado a la comprensión correcta de la realidad, en sentido amplio, en el marco de la física. La mecánica cuántica (MC), al mismo tiempo demanda y permite una visión altamente contraintuitiva del universe y del mundo. Como quiera que sea, la Ciencia permanece aún cautelosa acerca del tema de la nada, o el vacío. Aparentemente, se ha preferido una visión referencial y objetivista del universe y de las cosas. Este artículo argumenta en favor de la nada -o el vacío- basado en las lógicas no-clásicas (LNCs) en general, y en la lógica libre, en particular. La clave del tema estriba en pensar sin presuposiciones, o también, pensar acerca de los fenómenos, sistemas y comportamientos libres de existencia y, mejor aún, de referencia.

PDF
HTML

Referencias

Achille C. Varzi, 2007. “Supervaluationism and Its Logics”, in: Mind, Volume 116, Issue 463, July, Pages 633–676, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm633

Amano, Masami, and Iwama, Kazuo. 1999. Undecidability on Quantum Finite Automata, in: STOC '99: Proceedings of the thirty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, May, pages 368-375; https://doi.org/10.1145/301250.301344

Ayvazov, M., (2025). “Beyond Cause: The Acausal Principle and the Limits of Classical Explanation”, (May 12, 2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15391879. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254559

Barbour, J., 2020. The Janus Point. A New Theory of Time. New York: Basic Books

Barbour, J., 1999. The End of Time. The Next Revolution in Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Beall, J. C., and Restall, G., (2006). Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Bell, Jhon. 2011. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. 2ndEdition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Born, Max. 1935. The Restless Universe. London & Glasgow: Blackie & Son Limited

Calosi, Claudio, Wilson, Justin. 2021. Quantum indeterminacy and the double-slit experiment, in: Philos Stud, 178:3291–3317 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01602-7

Caponigro, Michele, Prakash, Ravi. 2009. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and Emptiness, in: Neuroquantology, June, vol. 7, issue 2, Page 198-203; available at: https://philarchive.org/archive/CAPIOQ-2

Chazal, G., (2009). Logiques non-standard. Éditions Universitaires de Dijon

Degichi, Tetsuo, Matsui, Chihiro. 2010. Correlation functions of the integrable higher-spin XXX and XXZ spin chains through the fusion method, in: Nuclear Physics B831 [FS], 359–407; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.12.030

Dirac, Paul. 1930. A theory of electrons and protons, in: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 106, issue 739, págs. 360-365; doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1924.0088

Gödel, K., (1986). Collected Works. Vol. I. Publications, 1929-1936. Edited by S. Feferman. Oxford: Oxford University Press-Clarendon

Heidegger, M., (1980). Holzwege. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann

Heisenberg, Werner. 1927. Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik, in: Z. Physik 43, 172–198 (1927); doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280

Heller, Michael. 2018. What does it mean “to exist” in physics?, in: (Zagadnienia Filosozoficzne w Nauce), Philosophical Problems in Science, No. 65, pp. 9-22; available at: https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/436

Hossenfelder, Sabine. 2023. What is Nothing? in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhfqdBk8qxk

Impey, Chris. 2010. How It Ends: From You to the Universe. New York: W. W. Norton & Company

Indrzejczak, Andrzej. 2021. Free Logics are Cut-Free. Studia Logica,109(4), 859–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-020-09929-8

Jacquette, D., (2015). Alexius Meinong, The Shepherd of Non-Being. Springer Verlag

Jansen, Franz Klaus. 2018. Quantum mechanics requires an observer context distinguishing between reality and its mental representation. NeuroQuantology,16(5), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2018.16.5.1266

Kauffman, S., (1993). The Origins of Order. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Klein, Oskar. 1974. Generalization of Einstein's Principle of Equivalence so as to Embrace the Field Equations of Gravitation. Physical Scripta, vol. 9, No. 2: 69. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/9/2/001

Lambert, Karel. 2003. Free Logic: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lambert, Karel, 1983. Meinong and the Principle of Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Landauer, Rolf. 1991. Information is Physical. Physics Today, 44, 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881299

Makinson, D., (2005). Bridges form Classical to Nonmonotonic Logic. King’s College London

Maldonado, Carlos Eduardo. 2022. Five Arguments toward Understanding Life in Light of a Physics of the Immaterial. Proceedings 2022, 81, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings 2022081019

Maudlin, T., (2019). Philosophy of Physics. Quantum Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Meinong, A., (1988). Über Gegenstandstheorie. Selbsdartellung. Felix Meiner Verlag

Naschie, Mohamed El. 2016a. Einstein-Rosen Bridge (ER), Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment (EPR) and Zero Measure Rindler-KAM Cantorian Spacetime Geometry (ZMG) Are Conceptually Equivalent, in: Journal of Quantum Information Science, 2016, 6, 1-9 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jqis http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2016.61001

Naschie, Mohamed El. 2016b. The Emergence of Spacetime from the Quantum in Three Steps, in: Advances in Pure Mathematics, 6, 446-454 Published Online May 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/apm http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/apm.2016.66032

Nelson, Eric S. 2023. Emptiness, negation, and skepticism in Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao. Asian Philosophy,33(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2023.2179966

Nolt, John. 2021. Free Logic, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta(ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/logic-free/

Pais, Alexander, (n.d.). On the Dirac Theory of the Electron (1930-1936). Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm:978-3-642-70078-1/2/1.pdf

Pavlović, Edi, & Gratzl, Norbert. 2023. Neutral Free Logic: Motivation, Proof Theory and Models. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 52(2), 519–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-022-09679-z

Pavlović, Edi, & Gratzl, Norbert. 2021. A More Unified Approach to Free Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 50(1), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-020-09564-7

Rami, Dolf. 2021. Single-domain free logic and the problem of compositionality. Synthese,198(10), 9479–9523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02651-x

Rovelli, Carlo. 2018. Reality Is Not What It Seems. The Journey to Quantum Gravity. Riverhead Books.

Shakoor, Jamil. 2023. Being and nothingness. In: Deep Reading, Deep Learning: Deep Reading Volume 2 (pp. 3–4).

https://doi.org/10.3726/b19104

Silberstein, M., Cifone, M., Stuckey, W. M., 2008. “Why quantum mechanics favors adynamical and acausal interpretations such as relational blockworld over backwardly causal and time-symmetric rivals”, en: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 736-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.07.005

Soo, Chopin, & Chang, Lay Nam. 1994. Superspace dynamics and perturbations around “emptiness.” International Journal of Modern Physics D,03(03), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021827189400068x

Svozil, Karl. 2018. Physical (A)Causality. Determinism, Randomness and Uncaused Events. Springer Verlag.

Vedral, Vlatko. 2010. Decoding Reality. The universe as quantum information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wang, Hao. 1997. A Logical Journey: From Gödel to Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Wirtz, Markus. 2023. Emptying the Mind: Nothingness in Mahayana Buddhism and in the Chan Tradition in Comparison to Western Philosophical Conceptualizations of Nothingness. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 50(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-12340098

Yourgrau, P., 2006. A World without Time. The Forgotten Legacy of Gödel and Einstein. New York: Basic Books

Zalamea, Fernando. 2021. Modelos en haces para el pensamiento matemático. Bogotá: Ed. Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Zalamea, Fernando. 2012. Synthetic Philosophy of Contemporary Mathematics. Urbanomic/Sequence Press.

Zolghadr, Benham. 2023. Gluon Theory: Being and Nothingness. Australasian Journal of Logic (16:3) 2019, Article no. 2, pp. 68-82. https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v16i3.4075

Zolghadr, Benham. 2019. Being and Nothingness. The Australasian Journal of Logic, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 68-82. https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v16i3.4075

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0.

Derechos de autor 2026 Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica