Keywords
Dirac
The Real and the Possible
Quantum Mechanics
Representation and Objectivity
How to Cite
Abstract
Since Dirac’s paper from 1930 on the theory of electrons and protons, the question about nothingness has pervaded the right conception of reality at large in the framework of physics. Quantum Mechanics (QM) both allows and demands, at the same time, a highly counterintuitive take on the universe and the world. However, science at large remains cautious about the issue of nothingness. Apparently a referential and objectivistic view of the universe and things is preferred. This paper argues in favor of nothingness based on non-classical logics (NCLs) in general, and free logic, in particular. The crux of the issue is about thinking without presuppositions, or also, thinking about phenomena, systems and behaviors free of existence and, moreover, of reference.
References
Achille C. Varzi, 2007. “Supervaluationism and Its Logics”, in: Mind, Volume 116, Issue 463, July, Pages 633–676, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm633
Amano, Masami, and Iwama, Kazuo. 1999. Undecidability on Quantum Finite Automata, in: STOC '99: Proceedings of the thirty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, May, pages 368-375; https://doi.org/10.1145/301250.301344
Ayvazov, M., (2025). “Beyond Cause: The Acausal Principle and the Limits of Classical Explanation”, (May 12, 2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15391879. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254559
Barbour, J., 2020. The Janus Point. A New Theory of Time. New York: Basic Books
Barbour, J., 1999. The End of Time. The Next Revolution in Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Beall, J. C., and Restall, G., (2006). Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Bell, Jhon. 2011. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. 2ndEdition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Born, Max. 1935. The Restless Universe. London & Glasgow: Blackie & Son Limited
Calosi, Claudio, Wilson, Justin. 2021. Quantum indeterminacy and the double-slit experiment, in: Philos Stud, 178:3291–3317 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01602-7
Caponigro, Michele, Prakash, Ravi. 2009. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and Emptiness, in: Neuroquantology, June, vol. 7, issue 2, Page 198-203; available at: https://philarchive.org/archive/CAPIOQ-2
Chazal, G., (2009). Logiques non-standard. Éditions Universitaires de Dijon
Degichi, Tetsuo, Matsui, Chihiro. 2010. Correlation functions of the integrable higher-spin XXX and XXZ spin chains through the fusion method, in: Nuclear Physics B831 [FS], 359–407; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.12.030
Dirac, Paul. 1930. A theory of electrons and protons, in: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 106, issue 739, págs. 360-365; doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1924.0088
Gödel, K., (1986). Collected Works. Vol. I. Publications, 1929-1936. Edited by S. Feferman. Oxford: Oxford University Press-Clarendon
Heidegger, M., (1980). Holzwege. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann
Heisenberg, Werner. 1927. Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik, in: Z. Physik 43, 172–198 (1927); doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280
Heller, Michael. 2018. What does it mean “to exist” in physics?, in: (Zagadnienia Filosozoficzne w Nauce), Philosophical Problems in Science, No. 65, pp. 9-22; available at: https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/436
Hossenfelder, Sabine. 2023. What is Nothing? in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhfqdBk8qxk
Impey, Chris. 2010. How It Ends: From You to the Universe. New York: W. W. Norton & Company
Indrzejczak, Andrzej. 2021. Free Logics are Cut-Free. Studia Logica,109(4), 859–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-020-09929-8
Jacquette, D., (2015). Alexius Meinong, The Shepherd of Non-Being. Springer Verlag
Jansen, Franz Klaus. 2018. Quantum mechanics requires an observer context distinguishing between reality and its mental representation. NeuroQuantology,16(5), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2018.16.5.1266
Kauffman, S., (1993). The Origins of Order. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Klein, Oskar. 1974. Generalization of Einstein's Principle of Equivalence so as to Embrace the Field Equations of Gravitation. Physical Scripta, vol. 9, No. 2: 69. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/9/2/001
Lambert, Karel. 2003. Free Logic: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lambert, Karel, 1983. Meinong and the Principle of Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Landauer, Rolf. 1991. Information is Physical. Physics Today, 44, 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881299
Makinson, D., (2005). Bridges form Classical to Nonmonotonic Logic. King’s College London
Maldonado, Carlos Eduardo. 2022. Five Arguments toward Understanding Life in Light of a Physics of the Immaterial. Proceedings 2022, 81, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings 2022081019
Maudlin, T., (2019). Philosophy of Physics. Quantum Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Meinong, A., (1988). Über Gegenstandstheorie. Selbsdartellung. Felix Meiner Verlag
Naschie, Mohamed El. 2016a. Einstein-Rosen Bridge (ER), Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment (EPR) and Zero Measure Rindler-KAM Cantorian Spacetime Geometry (ZMG) Are Conceptually Equivalent, in: Journal of Quantum Information Science, 2016, 6, 1-9 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jqis http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2016.61001
Naschie, Mohamed El. 2016b. The Emergence of Spacetime from the Quantum in Three Steps, in: Advances in Pure Mathematics, 6, 446-454 Published Online May 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/apm http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/apm.2016.66032
Nelson, Eric S. 2023. Emptiness, negation, and skepticism in Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao. Asian Philosophy,33(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2023.2179966
Nolt, John. 2021. Free Logic, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta(ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/logic-free/
Pais, Alexander, (n.d.). On the Dirac Theory of the Electron (1930-1936). Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm:978-3-642-70078-1/2/1.pdf
Pavlović, Edi, & Gratzl, Norbert. 2023. Neutral Free Logic: Motivation, Proof Theory and Models. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 52(2), 519–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-022-09679-z
Pavlović, Edi, & Gratzl, Norbert. 2021. A More Unified Approach to Free Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 50(1), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-020-09564-7
Rami, Dolf. 2021. Single-domain free logic and the problem of compositionality. Synthese,198(10), 9479–9523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02651-x
Rovelli, Carlo. 2018. Reality Is Not What It Seems. The Journey to Quantum Gravity. Riverhead Books.
Shakoor, Jamil. 2023. Being and nothingness. In: Deep Reading, Deep Learning: Deep Reading Volume 2 (pp. 3–4).
https://doi.org/10.3726/b19104
Silberstein, M., Cifone, M., Stuckey, W. M., 2008. “Why quantum mechanics favors adynamical and acausal interpretations such as relational blockworld over backwardly causal and time-symmetric rivals”, en: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 736-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.07.005
Soo, Chopin, & Chang, Lay Nam. 1994. Superspace dynamics and perturbations around “emptiness.” International Journal of Modern Physics D,03(03), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021827189400068x
Svozil, Karl. 2018. Physical (A)Causality. Determinism, Randomness and Uncaused Events. Springer Verlag.
Vedral, Vlatko. 2010. Decoding Reality. The universe as quantum information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, Hao. 1997. A Logical Journey: From Gödel to Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wirtz, Markus. 2023. Emptying the Mind: Nothingness in Mahayana Buddhism and in the Chan Tradition in Comparison to Western Philosophical Conceptualizations of Nothingness. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 50(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-12340098
Yourgrau, P., 2006. A World without Time. The Forgotten Legacy of Gödel and Einstein. New York: Basic Books
Zalamea, Fernando. 2021. Modelos en haces para el pensamiento matemático. Bogotá: Ed. Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Zalamea, Fernando. 2012. Synthetic Philosophy of Contemporary Mathematics. Urbanomic/Sequence Press.
Zolghadr, Benham. 2023. Gluon Theory: Being and Nothingness. Australasian Journal of Logic (16:3) 2019, Article no. 2, pp. 68-82. https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v16i3.4075
Zolghadr, Benham. 2019. Being and Nothingness. The Australasian Journal of Logic, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 68-82. https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v16i3.4075
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Philosophy of the University of Costa Rica