The AMMI and Clusters analysis in the selection of the best experimental corn hybrids.

Authors

  • Guillermo Castañón
  • Rigoberto Zetina Campo Experimental Papaloapan.
  • Rafael Arano Centro de Bachillerato Tecnológico Agropecuario #36
  • Bernardo Raygoza Centro de Bachillerato Tecnológico Agropecuario #36

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v11i1.17353

Abstract

Corn hybrids trail was repeated in four different environments, at this was applied the main additive effects and multiplicative interaction analysis (AMMI) and the cluster multivariate analysis or numerictaxonomy, in order to study if the two methods have certain relation to classify for stability and association hybrids performance. Cluster analysis did not show a clear tendency to group to evaluated hybrids for them relatives. According to the results, YG, PH and PRO, were the characteristics more important to joined for evaluated hybrids. The results indicated, that AMMI was effective to determine the stability of experimental hybrids and both (AMMI and Cluster) could be two tools very importants to make a good selection among experimental material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CARVER, B. F.; SMITH, E. L.; ENGLAND Jr. H. O. 1987. Regression and cluster analysis of environmental responses of hybrid and pureline winter wheat cultivars. Crop Sci. 27:659-664.

CASTAÑÓN, N. G.; TOSQUY, V. O. H. 1996. Análisis de la interacción Genotipo-Ambiente en híbridos tropicales de maíz (Zea mays L.) con diferentes métodos. Rev. Fitot. Mex. 19:141-150.

CASTAÑÓN, N. G. 1994. Estudio de la estabilidad de líneas avanzadas y variedades de arroz usando dos metodologías. Agron. Mesoam. 5:118-125.

CERVANTES, S. T. 1992. La interacción genotipo-ambiente en la clasificación de regiones agrícolas. Memorias, Simposio Interacción Genotipo-Ambiente en Genotecnia Vegetal. Guadalajara, Jal., México. pp. 117-125.

CÓRDOVA, H. 1992. Resultados diferenciales para rendimiento de híbridos de maíz evaluados en ambientes contrastantes de Latinoamérica. Agron. Mesoam 3:1-8.

CORNELIUS, P. L.; VAN SANFORD, D. A.; SEYEDSADR, M. 1993. Clustering cultivars into groups without rank change interactions. Corp Sci. 33:1193-1200

CROSSA, J.; GAUCH JR. H. G.; ZOBEL, R. W. 1990. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trails. Crop. Sci. 30(3):493-500.

CHOWDHURY, R. K; SINGH, V. P. ; SINGH, R. K. 1982. Efficiency of various stability models for ranking Barley Genotypes. Cereal Research Communications. 10(2):95-101.

GHADERI, A.; EVERSON, E. H.; CRESS, C. E. 1980. Classification of environments and genotypes in wheat. Crop Sci. 20:707-710

GAUCH, JR. H. G. 1993. Prediction, parsimony and noise. American Sci. 81:468-478.

GAUCH, JR. H. G.; ZOBEL, R. W. 1988. Predictive and posdictive sucess of statistical of yield trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:1-10.

GAUCH, JR. H. G.; FURNAS, R. E. 1991. Statistical analysis of yield trails with MATMODEL. Agron. J. 83:916-920.

PRASAD, S K.; SINGH, T. P. 1980. A comparison of different methods for determining the stability of maize varieties. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 50(10):731-733.

QUEMÉ, J. L.; PÉREZ, C.; FUENTES, M.; LARIOS, L.; CASTELLANOS, S. 1993. Selección de líneas de maíz (Zea mays L.) de grano blanco para factores adversos bióticos y abióticos en seis localidades de Centro América. XXXIX Reunión Anual del PCCMCA. ICTA, Cd. Guatemala, Guatemala.

SALMERÓN, Z. J. J.; CABAÑAS, C. B.; CHÁVEZ, CH. J.; VALENZUELA, V. M. 1996. Agrupación de ambientes de temporal y genotipos de avena con el modelo AMMI. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 19(2):151-162.

SHORTER, R.; BYTH, D. E. ; MUNTGOMERY, V. E. 1977. Genotype x environment interactions and environmental adaptation. II. Assessment of environmen

How to Cite

Castañón, G., Zetina, R., Arano, R., & Raygoza, B. (2006). The AMMI and Clusters analysis in the selection of the best experimental corn hybrids. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 11(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v11i1.17353

Most read articles by the same author(s)