Coro test crosses in two different environments in Veracruz, Mexico.

Authors

  • Guillermo Castañón Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP).
  • Dan Jeffers CIIMYT
  • Héctor Hidalgo Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP).
  • Hugo Tosquy Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v9i2.20114

Abstract

Twenty-four lines at the S5 inbreeding level were crossed with two testers (CML 247 and CML 254) to produce test crosses. The resulting hybrids were evaluated in San Andrés Tuxtla, and Ignacio de la Llave, where major environmental differences are found in temperature, precipitation, and average height above sea level. Results showed that general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) were significant. Three variables were significant sources of variation in the first case: bad ear cover (BEC), roUen ears (RE), and grain yield (GY); while for hybrid combinations (line x tester), only two variables were significant: BEC and GY. Significant ACE values separated the lines by varialbe evaluated, but the most interesting variable was GY. In general, the best test crosses were superior to their commercial controls. Hybrid 12 had the highest GY, ranking 1 (Tester 1), producing 8973 kg/ha; and hybrid 4 had the lowest GY, ranking 24 (Tester 1), yielding 5480 kg/ha. Hybrids combined with Tester 2 had a lower performance: the highest GY - ranking as 1 - was hybrid 3- which produced 7972 kg/ha; and hybrid 20 showed the lowest GY, producing 3553 kg/ha, occupying the lowest position in the ranking. It was also noted that the lines x tester with the best SCA for GY resulted in higher values in at least one of the other three variables evaluated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARUNACHALAM, V. 1974. The fallacy behind the use of modified line x tester designo Indian J. Genet. and Plant Breeding. 34(2):280-287.

BECK, D. L.; VAS AL, S. K.; CROSSA, J. 1991. Heterosis and combining ability among subtropical and temperate intermediate-maturity maize germoplasm. Crop Sci. 31:68-73.

BHAGYALAKSHMI, K. V; NATARAJAN, B. V; NAGARAJAN, R. 1986. Combining ability studies in sugarcrane. Indian J. Genet. 46(3):515-520.

BLUM, A. 1988. Plant breeding for stress environments. CRC Press Inc. Boca Ratón Florida, USA. p. 28-35.

DAVIS, R. 1927. Report of the plant breeder. Puerto Rico. Agr. Exp. At. Ann. 1927:14-15.

GALARZA, S. M.; ANGELES, A. H. H.; MOLlNA, G. J. 1973. Estudio comparativo entre la prueba de líneas per se y la prueba de mestizos para evaluar aptitud combinatoria general de líneas S1 de maíz (Zea mays L.) Agrociencia 11:127-138.

GÓMEZ, M. N.; CAÑEDO, C. J. 1988. Aprovechamiento de las razas mexicanas de maíz en un programa de mejoramiento genético. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 11: 11-17.

GÓNZALEZ, J. S.; CÓRDOBA, H.; RODRÍGUEZ, S.; DE LEÓN, H.; SERRATO, V 1997. Determinación de un patrón heterótico a partir de la evaluación de un dialelo de díez líneas de maíz subtropical. Agron. Meso. 8(1):1-7.

KADKOL, G. P.; ANAND, I. J.; SHARMA, R. P. 1984. Combining ability and heterosis in sunflower. Indian J. Genet.

(3):447-451.

KEMPTHRONE, O, 1957. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. pp. 468-471.

MARTÍNEZ, G.; DE LEÓN, C. H. 1996. Efectos genéticos en híbridos de maíz tropical (Zea mays L.). III . Acame, mala cobertura y pudrición de mazorca. Agron. Meso. 7(1):47-52.

PAZ, J. R.; MOLlNA, G. J.; BUCIO, A. L. 1973. Variedades de bajo rendimiento contra variedades de alto rendimiento como probadores para medir la aptitud combinatoria general de las líneas autofecundadas de maíz. Agrociencia 11:43-55.

ROJAS, M. B.; SPRAGUE, G. F. 1952. A comparison of variance components in corn yield trails. III General and specific ability and their interaction with location and years. Agron. J. 44:462-466.

SHAGÚN, C. J. 1993. Funcionalidad de cuatro modelos para las evaluaciones genotípicas en series de experimentos. Rev. Fitol. Mex. 16(2):161-17l.

SPRAGUE, G. F. 1952. Early testing and recurrent selection. In: J. W. Owen (ed). Heterosis chapter 26. lowa State

College. Press. Ames. lowa. p. 400-417.

TERRÓN, A.; PRECIADO, E.; CÓRDOBA, H.; MICKELSON, H.; LÓPEZ, R. 1997. Determinación del patrón heterótico de 30 líneas de maíz derivadas de la población 43SR del CIMMYT. Agron. Meso. 8(1):26-34.

VYAS, K. L.; POKHRIYAL, S. C. 1985. Combining ability studies on landraces of pearl millet from Rajasthan. Indian J. Genet. 45(2):247-254.

Published

2016-05-30

How to Cite

Castañón, G., Jeffers, D., Hidalgo, H., & Tosquy, H. (2016). Coro test crosses in two different environments in Veracruz, Mexico. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 9(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v9i2.20114

Most read articles by the same author(s)