Reciprocal recurrent selection in corn: tolerance to attack of the coro earworm and the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors

  • Mario Fuentes Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Universidad de Puerto Rico.
  • Alberto Pantoja Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Universidad de Puerto Rico.
  • Antonio Sotomayor Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Universidad de Puerto Rico.
  • James Beaver Departamento de Agronomía, Universidad de Puerto Rico.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v9i1.24624

Abstract

The progressive selection of yield, agronomic characteristics and quantification of damages caused by Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) and Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), were evaluated after four selection cycles on maize populations (Zea mays L., varieties Ohio S9, Ohio S10, Mayorbela and Diente de caballo, under chemical control and natural infestation conditions. The experiments were carried out at an experimental site in a tropical agriculture research station (TARS), a USDA station located in Isabela, Puerto Rico. The experimental design consisted of random entire blocks with five repetitions, and treatments were asigned according to a factorial arrangement with parcels divided at a density of 44.444 plants/ha. Significant differences were found among populations and selection cycles for yield, plant and cob height, and percentage of insect-related losses*. The highest yield was obtained from the Ohio S 10 population with 4.824 kg/ha, and 169 kg/ha - a profit of 1.2% per selection cycle. The latest selection cycles showed a greater yield and better agronomic characteristics than the initial selection cycle of each population under improvement. Losses in yield caused by S. frugiperda and H. zea oscillated between 3-21 % and 17-28%, respectively. Ohio S9 showed the greatest los s in yield caused by these insects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

EBERHART, S. A.; DEBELA S.; HALLAUER A. R. 1973. Reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB 1 maize populations and half-sib selection in BSSS. Crop Science 13:451-456.

FALCONER, D.S. 1964. Quantitative genetics. Ronald Press Company. New York. 365 p.

FlGUEROA, E. 1983. Ciclo de vida y enemigos naturales de Heliothis zea (Boddie) Lepidoptera: Noctuidae en Puerto Rico. Tesis de M. S. Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez, Departamento de Protección de Cultivos. 109 p.

HRUSKA, A.; GLADSTONE S. M. 1988. Effect of period and level of infestation of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, on irrigated maize yield. Florida Entomol. 71(3):249-254.

KEERATINIJAKAL, V.; LAMKEY K. R. 1993. Responses to reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Science. 33:73-77.

KING, A.; SAUNDERS J. L. 1984. Las plagas invertebradas de cultivos anuales alimenticios en América Central. In: Manejo integrado de plagas insectiles en la agricultura: Estado actual y futuro. Keith Andrews y José Rutilio Quezada (Editores). Departamento de Protección Vegetal. Escuela Agrícola Panamericana. El Zamorano. Honduras. 623 p.

MARTIN, J.M.; HALLAUER A. R. 1980. Seven cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS maize populations. Crop Science. 20:599-603.

MIHM, J.A.; SMITH M. E.; DEUTSCH J. A. 1988. Development of open-pollinated varieties, non-conventional hybrids and inbred lines oftropical maize with resistance to fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), at CIMMYT. Florida Entomol. 71(3):262-268.

ORTEGA, A.; DE LEON C. 1974. Maize insects and diseaseso In: Proc. Symp. on world-wide maize improvement in the 70's and the role of CIMMYT. El Batán, México. 327 p.

ORTEGA, A.; VAS AL S. K.; MIHM J. A.; HERSHEY C. 1980. Breeding for insect resistance in maize. In Toward insect resistant maize for the third world: Proceedings of the Intemational Symposium on Methodologies for Developing host plant resistance to maize insects. CIMMYT, El Batán, Mexico. 327 p.

PEAIRS, EB. 1980. Principales plagas de los granos básicos. In Manejo integrado de plagas insectiles en la agricultura. Estado actual y futuro. Keith Andrews y José Rutilio Quezada (Editores). Departamento de Protección Vegetal. Escuela Agrícola Panamerica. El Zamorano, Honduras. 623 p.

PEAIRS, F. B.; SAUNDERS J. L. 1981. Plant damage and yield response to Diatraea saccharalis and Spodoptera frugiperda. In selection cycles of two tropical maize populations in Mexico. Turrialba 31(1):1-93.

PENNY, L.H.; EBERHART S.A. 1971. Twenty years of reciprocal recurrent selection with two synthetic varieties of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Science 11:900-903.

POLLAK, L. M.; TORRES C. S.; SOTOMAYOR R A. 1991. Evaluation ofheterotic pattems among caribbean an tropical x temperate maize populations. Crop Science. 31:1480-1483.

POEHLMAN, lM. 1986. Breeding field crops. Third edition. An AVI Book, New York. 724 p.

QUlLES, A. 1983. Respuesta del maíz a la fertilización nitrogenada ya densidades poblacionales en dos localidades de Puerto Rico. Tesis de M.S. Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez, Departamento de Agronomía y Suelos. 96 p.

ROGERS, C.E. 1989. Management ofmaize insects with resistant cultivars in the southem region of the United States. In Toward insect resistant maize for the third world: Proceedings of the Intemational Symposium on

methodologies for developing host plant resistance to maize insects. CIMMYT, El Batán, México. 327 p.

SPARKS, A.N. 1986. Fall armyworm Lepidoptera (Noctuidae): Potential for area-wide management. Florida Entomol. 69:603-614.

STINNER, R E.; RABB R L.; BRADLEY J. R, JR 1977. Natural factor operating in the population dynamics of Heliothis zea in North Carolina. In Proceedings XV Intemational Congress of Entomology, Washington, D.e.

USDA, 1993. National agricultural statistics service. Agricu1tural Statistics. Washington. 517 p.

WEBSTER O.; WALKER D. 1977. A field test of com cultivars for insect and disease resistance. Joumal of Agriculture, University of Puerto Rico. 61 (3):319-325.

WlDSTROM N. w.; BONDARI K.; MCMILLIAN W. W.1992. Hybrid performance among maize populations selected for resistance to insects. Crop Science 32:85-89.

WISEMAN, B.R 1989. Technological advances for determining resistance in maize to Heliothis zea. In Toward insect resistant maize for the third world: Proceedings of the Intemational Symposium on Methodologies for Developing host plant resistance to maize insects. CIMMYT, El Batán, México. 327 p.

WISEMAN B. R; WASSOM e. E.; PAINTER R H. 1967. An unusual feeding habit to measure differences in damage to 81 Latin American lines by the fall armyworm. Agron. J. 59:279-281.

WISEMAN B. R; WIDSTROM N. M W.W. MCMILLIAM. 1981. Influence of com silks on com earworm feeding response. Florida Entomol. 64(3):395-399.

Published

2016-05-31

How to Cite

Fuentes, M., Pantoja, A., Sotomayor, A., & Beaver, J. (2016). Reciprocal recurrent selection in corn: tolerance to attack of the coro earworm and the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Agronomía Mesoamericana, 9(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v9i1.24624