Biologic attack of Rhizoctonia solani by using Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli in the field.

Authors

  • Floribeth Mora Fitopatología. Universidad Nacional. Heredia, Costa Rica.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v7i2.24753

Abstract

With the objective of evaluating, in the field, the antagonism of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli against Rhizoctonia solani, two experiments were established in the zones of Santa Rosa de Pocosol (Alajuela) and Sabanilla de Montes de Oca (San José), in two different sowing seasons. The stocks CR- 455, CR-477, CR-487, CR-422 and CIAT-632, were evaluated and were inoculated with R. solani. Besides the stocks we included the following treatments: Absolute Witness (AW), with no R. solani inoculation, with no nitrogen added(-N, -R); +N-R (+140 kg N/ha, with no R. solani inoculation); +N+R (+140 kg N&ha, with R. solani inoculated). The soil was inoculated utilizing rice husks colonized by R. solani, at a dosis of 14,5 g/m2.. We evaluated the variables: porcent of germination, plants height and infection rate. We performed the evaluations at 8 and 18 days after germination. We utilized the design of complete blocks ramdomly located with six repetitions per treatment. The variable of plant height did not show any differences between treatments in any of the zones. The treatment with fungicides was the one which showed more germination percentages in both experiments. In Pocosol, all the stocks sho wed some inhibition effect towards the fungus (P<0.05), but only during the period of the first evaluation. In Montes de Oca, we observed a larger inhibiton effect thant the one in Santa Rosa; the stocks CR-487 and CR- 422 showed smaller I.I than the witness in the first evaluation (P<0,05), and they all showd significant differences on what concerns the +N+R treatment for the same variable, during the second evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALEXANDER, M. 1985. Ecological constraints on nitrogen fixation in agricultural ecosystems. Ed. M Alexander. Advances in Microbial Ecology. vol 5.

ANTOUN, H.; BORDELEAU, L.; GAGNON, C. 1978. Absence the production de metabolites a activite antifongique chez Rhizobium sp. Phytoprotection 59: 40-42.

ARAYA, C.; GONZALEZ, L. C. 1979. Efecto de la época de producción y del tratamiento de semilla en el vigor y sanidad de plantas de frijol. Agronomía Costarricense 3(2):201-204.

BAKER, R. 1971. Analysis involving inoculum density soilborne plant pathogens in epidemiology. Phytopathology 61: 1280-1292.

BAKER, K.; COOK, J. 1974. Biocontrol of plant pathogens. W. H. Freeman and Co., U.S.A. 433 p.

BARNES, J.; CSINOS, A. 1990. Effects of fungicides, cultivars, irrigation, and environment on Rhizoctonia limb rot of peanut. Plant disease 74:671-676.

BENSON, D. M.; BAKER, R. 1970. Rhizosphere competition in model soil systems. Phytopathology. 60:1058-1061.

BENSON, D.; BAKER, R. 1974. Epidemiology of Rhizoctonia solani preemergence damping-off or radish: inoculum otential and disease potential interaction. Phytopathology 64:957-962.

BENSON, D., 1991. Control of Rhizoctonia stem rot of Poinsettia during propagation with fungicides that prevent colonization of rooting cubes by Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Disease 75: 394-398

BLAKEMAN, J. P.; FOKKEMA, N. J. 1982. Potential for biocontrol of plant diseases on the phylloplane. Annual Review of Phytopathology 20: 167-192.

Published

2016-06-02

How to Cite

Mora, F. (2016). Biologic attack of Rhizoctonia solani by using Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli in the field. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 7(2), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v7i2.24753