Phenotypic stability of pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the production area of Nariño, Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v32i3.41408Keywords:
grain legumes, genotype environment interaction, genetic variation, yield componentsAbstract
Introduction. The pea (Pisum sativum L.) is a legume crop of great importance for the peasant economy in the high Andean zone of the department of Nariño, Colombia. Most of the pea production in this department is marketed as fresh pods; however, it is necessary to strengthen the local dry bean market, which requires varieties adapted to regional conditions. Objective. To evaluate fifteen pea genotypes for phenotypic stability of dry grain yield, in the Nariño production zone. Materials and methods. Between 2013 and 2014, fifteen pea genotypes were evaluated in three Nariño environments. The experiments were established with a randomized complete block design and four replicates. The GGE biplot model was used for dry grain yield stability analysis. Results. In the analysis of variance across the three environments, there were significant effects (p<0.05) of environments (A), genotypes (G), and GA interaction, for dry grain yield and number of grains per pod. The average yield for all environments was between 747.5 and 1357.3 kg ha-1 and the grains per pod between 4.4 and 5.4. The genotypes ARUDN-3562 and VOUDN-7350 stood out for being stable and for their high yields (kg ha-1) with 1357.3 and 1144.1, respectively, which exceeded the general average (1057.9) and were statistically similar to the controls Alcala (1227.8), Obonuco Andina (1238.1), and Santa Isabel (1013.6). Conclusion. The genotypes studied showed high variability in yield and phenotypic stability, which will allow expanding the working collection for pea improvement in Nariño. The genotypes ARUDN-3562 and VOUDN-7350 stood out and could be used individually or as parental.
Downloads
References
Araméndiz, H., Espitia, M., Agámez, A., Cardona, C., & Robles, J. (2007). Estabilidad fenotípica de genotipos de algodón (Gossypium hirsutum L.) en el caribe colombiano. Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, 10(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v10.n2.2007.585
Campuzano, L., Yepes, B., Benavides, J., Bolaños, M., Arcila, B., López, C., & Cepeda, G. (2003). Obonuco Andina nueva variedad mejorada de arveja para la zona de economía campesina del sur de Nariño. Revista Regional Novedades Técnicas, 2003, 26–28. https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12324/953/42731_46828.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Cruz, C., Carneiro, P., & Regazzi, A. (2014). Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético (3a Ed.). Editora UFV.
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. (2015, marzo). El cultivo de la arveja en Colombia. Boletín Mensual Insumos y Factores Asociados a la Producción Agropecuaria, 33, 1–12. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/agropecuario/sipsa/Bol_Insumos31_-mar_2015.pdf
Eberhart, S., & Russell, W. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crops Science, 6(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
Frutos-Bernal, M. (2011). Interacción genotipo - ambiente: GGE biplot y modelos AMMI [Tesis de maestría, Universidad de Salamanca]. Repositorio documental GREDOS. http://hdl.handle.net/10366/121900
González, F., & Ligarreto, G. (2006). Rendimiento de ocho genotipos promisorios de arveja arbustiva (Pisum sativum L.) bajo sistema de agricultura protegida. Revista Fitotecnia Colombiana, 6(2), 52–61.
Gordón-Mendoza R., Camargo-Buitrago, I., Franco-Barrera, J., & González-Saavedra, A. (2006). Evaluación de la adaptabilidad y estabilidad de 14 híbridos de maíz, Azuero, Panamá. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 17(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v17i2.5159
Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. (2017). Valores mensuales de temperatura y precipitación de Nariño, 1956–2017. http://www.ideam.gov.co/web/tiempo-y-clima/climatologico-mensual/-/document_library_display/xYvlPc4uxk1Y/view/71473013
Ledesma-Ramírez, L., Solís-Moya, E., Suaste-Franco, M., Rodríguez-Caracheo, J., & De la Cruz-Gonzalez, M. (2012). Análisis GGE Biplot del rendimiento de trigo (Triticum spp.) con riego normal y restringido en el Bajío, México. Agrociencia, 46(2), 119–131. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/agro/v46n2/v46n2a3.pdf
Ligarreto, G. A., Castro, O. A., y Cháves, B. (2015). Estabilidad fenotípica de una colección de fríjol andino (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) tipo arbustivo. Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, 18(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v18.n1.2015.459
Lozano-Ramírez, A., Santacruz-Varela, A., San-Vicente-García, F., Crossa, J., Burgueño, J. & Molina-Galán, J. D. (2015). Modelación de la interacción genotipo × ambiente en rendimiento de híbridos de maíz blanco en ambientes múltiples. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 38(4), 337–347. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rfm/v38n4/v38n4a1.pdf
Muñoz, M. A. (2012). Interacción genotipo ambiente de 20 líneas de arveja arbustiva Pisum sativum L. para cinco municipios de la zona sur del departamento de Nariño [Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de Nariño]. Sistema Institucional de Recursos Digitales de la Universidad de Nariño. http://sired.udenar.edu.co/3335/
Olivoto, T., & Lúcio, D. (2020). Metan: An R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(6), 783–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13384
Peñaranda, G., & Molina, D. (2011). La producción de arveja (Pisum sativum L.) en la vereda Monteadentro, provincia de Pamplona, Norte de Santander. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, 11(1), 43–56. http://revistas.unipamplona.edu.co/ojs_viceinves/index.php/FACE/article/view/334/322
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Red de información y comunicación del sector Agropecuario Colombiano. (2019). Comparativo de área, producción, rendimiento y participación departamental por cultivo. https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx?cod=3#
Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural de Nariño, & Universidad Sergio Arboleda. (2017). Consolidado Agropecuario de Nariño 2017. SCRIBD. https://es.scribd.com/document/479026166/CONSOLIDADO-AGROPECUARIO-NARINO-2017-3
Torres-Martínez, F. J., Rivadeneira-Miranda, C. N., & Castillo-Marín, A. J. (2020). Producción y comercialización de arveja en el departamento de Nariño-Colombia. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 31(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.15517/AM.V31I1.36776
Vallejo-Cabrera, F. A., & Estrada-Salazar, E. I. (2013). Mejoramiento genético de plantas (2a Ed.). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Vargas-Escobar, E. A., Vargas-Sánchez, J. E., & Baena-García, D. (2016). Análisis de estabilidad y adaptabilidad de híbridos de maíz de alta calidad proteica en diferentes zonas agroecológicas de Colombia. Acta Agronómica, 65(1), 72–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/acag.v65n1.43417
Yan, W., Hunt, L., Sheng, Q., & Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega environment investigation based on the GGE Biplot. Crop Science, 40(3), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x
Yan, W., & Kang, M. (2003). GGE Biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists (1st Ed.) CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.routledge.com/GGE-Biplot-Analysis-A-Graphical-Tool-for-Breeders-Geneticists-and-Agronomists/Yan-Kang/p/book/9780367454791
Zobel, R. W., Wright, M. J., & Gauch, H. G. (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal, 80(3), 388–393. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
