Respuestas diferenciales para rendimiento de híbridos maíz evaluados en ambientes contrastantes de latinoamérica PCCMCA 1990
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v3i0.25197Abstract
The uniform assay of the PCCMCA involves the evaluation of 30 coro hybrids in 20 contrasting environments in Latin America. The results from 1990 prove the consistency of response of come coro hybrids which have remaines in the first places during three years through 51 localities: HB-85, HB-83 and XH-53, with yields up to 6000 kg/ha (27% over the control). The stability parameters confirm the fitness of this response. New hybrids from private companies and national programmes show a continuous progress in plant breeding.
Downloads
References
BLUM, A 1988. Plant breeding for stress environments. 18-28. CRC press.
BRADLEY, J.P.; KNITTLE K.H; TROYER AF. 1988. Statistical methods in seed corn product selection. J. Prod. Agri. 1:34-38.
CARBALLO, C. A.; MARQUEZ, S.F. 1970. Comparación de variedades de maíz de El Bajio y La Mesa Central por su rendimiento y estabilidad. Agro-Ciencias 5(1): 129-146.
CORDOVA, H.S. 1978. Uso de parámetros de estabilidad para evaluar el comportamiento de variedades. Guatemala, ICfA. 35 p.
CORDOV A, H. S.; RAUN, W.; BARKER, T. 1988. El uso de parámetros de estabilidad para determinar la adaptación de 36 cultivares de maíz Simposiun Modelos de Estabilidad para Evaluar la Adaptación de Cultivos. XXXIV Reunión Anual del PCCMCA San José, Costa Rica. 5p.
CORDOVA, H.S. 1989. Evaluación de 36 cultivares de maíz en 20 ambientes de Centroamérica, Panamá y El Caribe PCCMCA 1988. XXXV Reunión Anual del PCCMCA San Pedro Sula, Honduras. abril 2 al 7.vol 3. 903p.
DAVILA, FA; CORDOVA, II.S; POEY, F.R.l978. Uso de parámetros de estabilidad en la evaluación de variedades comerciales y experimentales de maíz Zea mays L.ñ (1) Zona Media. XXIV Reunión Anual del PCCMCA. San Salvador.El Salvador. p.M31/1-
EBERHART, SA; RUSSELL, W A 1%6. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci. 6:36-40.
FINIA Y, K.. W.; WlLKINSON G. N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in plant breeding programe, Aus. J. of Agriculture research, 14, 742.
GAUCH, H. G.; ZOBEL. R. W. 1988. Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analysis of yield trials. Theor. App!. Genet. 76:1 10.
GAUCH, KG.; ZOBEL, R. W. 1989. Accuracy and selection success in yield trial analysis. Theor. App!. Genet. 77:473-481.
KANG, M. S. 1990. Genotype by environment interaction and its implication in plant breeding. Symposium on: Genotypes by environment interaction and plant breeding. Ed. by Manjit, S. Kang, LSU, Agricultural Center.
KEMPTON, R. A 1984. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. J. A.gric. Sci. 103:123-136.
ZOBEL, R. W.; WRIGTHT, MJ.; GAUCH, H.G. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80:388-393.
ZOBEL, R. W. 1990. A powerful statistical model for understanding genotype-by-environmental interaction in genotype-by-environmental interaction and plant breeding. L.S.U. Agricultural center.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
