Resumen
El propósito de este artículo es estudiar científicamente la actividad y los alcances de los Centros para el Desarrollo de la Pequeña Empresa (SBDC), a través de una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Para tal fin, se realiza una búsqueda booleana y se extrae la información de tres bases de datos: Scopus, SSCI y EBSCOhost. Los objetivos específicos son: identificar las diferentes perspectivas teóricas que caracterizan y definen la literatura relacionada con los SBDC y destacar las conexiones entre ellas; determinar la perspectiva a la que los investigadores le han otorgado mayor importancia de acuerdo con un análisis de tendencias de las publicaciones; identificar los mayores exponentes del tema e identificar las fuentes que mayormente son consultadas. Para obtener la información bibliométrica se utilizaron técnicas de citación para seleccionar, analizar e interpretar los patrones dentro de la literatura. Se logra: identificar el desarrollo de negocios y la educación empresarial como las dos principales perspectivas teóricas; se establece la educación empresarial como la perspectiva de mayor importancia dado su crecimiento; se reconocen los mayores exponentes, y fuentes que publican el tema. Desde un aspecto práctico, esta investigación contribuye al análisis de la teoría existente sobre SBDC y evidencia la efectividad de estos.
Citas
Bosma, N., & Kelley, D. (2019). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2018-19 (Vol. 8). https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2018-2019-global-report
Boyle, F., & Sherman, D. (2006). “ScopusTM: The Product and Its Development.” The Serials Librarian, 49(3): 147–53. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v49n03_12
Chrisman, J. J. (1989). Strategic, administrative, and operating assistance: The value of outside consulting to pre-venture entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(6), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(89)90010-4
Chrisman, J. J., Carsrud, A. L., DeCastro, J., & Herron, L. (1990). A comparison of assistance needs of male and female pre-venture entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90019-P
Chrisman J. J., Chua J. H., & Kellermanns, F. (2009). Priorities, resource stocks, and performance in family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(3), 739–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00324.x
Chrisman, J. J., Hoy, F., & Robinson, R. B. (1987). New venture development: The costs and benefits of public sector assistance. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90024-3
Chrisman, J. J., & Katrishen, F. (1994). The economic impact of small business development center counseling activities in the United States: 1990-1991. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90008-6
Chrisman, J. J., & Katrishen, F. (1995). The small business development center programme in the USA: A statistical analysis of its impact on economic development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629500000009
Chrisman, J. J., McMullan, W. E., Kirk Ring, J., & Holt, D. T. (2012). Counseling assistance, entrepreneurship education, and new venture performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 1(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/20452101211208362
Dill, D. D. (1995). University-industry entrepreneurship: The organization and management of American university technology transfer units. Higher Education, 29(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383958
Dini, M. (2019). Centros de desarrollo empresarial en América Latina: Lecciones de política de cinco experiencias institucionales. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/44589
Dini, M., & Stumpo, G. (2018). Mipymes en América Latina. Un frágil desempeño y nuevos desafíos para las políticas de fomento. CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/44148.1
Hernández-Sánchez, B., Vargas-Morúa, G., González Cedeño, G., & Sánchez-García, J. C. (2020). Discapacidad intelectual y el uso de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación: revisión sistemática. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology INFAD, 2(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2020.n1.v2.1830
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M. Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), E1-E34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
McInturff, P., & Tapie Rohm, C. E.. (2002). Developing M-education for entrepreneurs and small businesses. Journal of Internet Commerce, 1(3), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J179v01n03_05
Medaris, L., & Manley, M. (1997). Building a better mousetrap: Networking with community business resources. The Reference Librarian, 27(58), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v27n58_05
Medeiros, V., Godoi, L. G., & Teixeira, E. C. (2019). La competitividad y sus factores determinantes: Un análisis sistémico para países en desarrollo. Revista de la CEPAL, 2019(129), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.18356/9c2a7060-es
Oprea, D., & Bernier, R. E. (2004). Sustaining free market economic education in a transition economy: A romanian experience. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(11–12), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-200037368
Phillips, R. L. (2014). An Analysis of Small Business Assistance Websites: Content and Delivery. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship, 19(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2014.883880
Politis, J. L., & Shooter, S. B. (2001). Enhancing Engineering Education: The Bucknell Product Development Center. Industry and Higher Education, 15(5), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000001101295876
Roebuck, D. B., & Brawley, D. E. (1996). Forging Links Between the Academic and Business Communities. Journal of Education for Business, 71(3), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1996.10116771
Roundy, P. T. (2017). Hybrid organizations and the logics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0452-9
Sánchez-García, J., Vargas-Morúa, G., & Hernández-Sánchez, B. (2018). Entrepreneurs’ Well-Being: A Bibliometric Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(September), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01696
Sarmiento, J. P., Hoberman, G., Jerath, M., & Ferreira Jordao, G. (2016). Disaster risk management and business education: the case of small and medium enterprises. AD-Minister, 28, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.28.4
Steinnes, D. N. (1987). On Understanding and Evaluating the University’s Evolving Economic Development Policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 1(3), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124248700100304
Udell, G. G. (1988). Strategies for stimulating home-grown technology-based economic development. Business Horizons, 31(6), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(88)90026-2
Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clinica, 135(11), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.001
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
Werbel, J. D., & Danes, S. M. (2010). Work family conflict in new business ventures: The moderating effects of spousal commitment to the new business venture. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00301.x