Nursing Journal in Costa Rica ISSN electrónico: 1409-4568

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/enfermeria/oai
Mobile Simulation Contributions to Healthcare Professionals and the Community: Scoping Protocol Review
Portugal (Português (Brasil))

Supplementary Files

Audio (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Simulation
Patient Simulation
Educational Technology
Simulation Training
Entrenamiento Simulado
Simulación
Simulación de Paciente
Tecnología Educacional
Simulação
Simulação de Paciente
Tecnologia Educacional
Treinamento por Simulação

How to Cite

1.
Silva CCR da, Domingues Fernandes MI, Negrão Baptista RC, Oliveira Silva RM, Hagemann de Malfussi LB. Mobile Simulation Contributions to Healthcare Professionals and the Community: Scoping Protocol Review. Enferm. Actual Costa Rica (en línea) [Internet]. 2020Jun.17 [cited 2024Dec.21];(39). Available from: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/enfermeria/article/view/40348

Abstract

The purpose of this Scoping Review is to identify and analyze in the literature the use of the mobile simulation strategy for health professionals and the community. Clinical simulation is a form of active methodology that safely favors the development of various skills and competencies for both students and health professionals, helps decision making by allowing the simulated situation to be repeated without exposing the patient to mistakes. Mobile simulation is a recent field of clinical simulation and refers to the simulation that is transferred to professionals. The question that guides this review is: what contributions from mobile simulation have been identified and evaluated in the training processes of health professionals and the community? The methodological route used for the development of this protocol followed the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping review, consisting of five steps: formulation of the research question; identification of relevant studies; Selection of studies; mapping of scientific evidence; presentation and interpretation of results.

https://doi.org/10.15517/revenf.v0i39.40348
Portugal (Português (Brasil))

References

Almeida DR, Nodari CH, Guimarães CM, Coutinho AOR, Bez MR. A simulação como estratégia de ensino aprendizagem em enfermagem: uma revisão integrativa. Rev. Educ. Saúde. 2018; 6(2): 98-105. DOI: http://10.29237/2358-9868.2018v6i2.p98-105

Schofield L, Welfare E, Mercer S. In-situ simulation. Trauma. 2018, 20(4): 281-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1460408617711729

Shin S, Park JH, Kim JH. Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: Meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today. 2015, 35(1): 176-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009

Kurup V, Matei V, Ray J. Role of in-situ simulation for training in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 2017, 30(6): 755-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000514

Villemure C, Tanoubi I, Georgescu LM, Dubé JN, Houle J. An integrative review of in situ simulation training: Implications for critical care nurses. Can J Crit Care Nurs. 2016, 27(1): 22-31. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047999

Fitzgerald M, Ward J. Using Standardized Actors to Promote Family-centered Care. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019, 45:20-25. DOI: http://10.1016/j.pedn.2018.12.002

Oliveira SN, do Prado ML, Kempfer SS, Martini JG, Caravaca-Morera JA, Bernardi MC. Experiential learning in nursing consultation education via clinical simulation with actors: Action research. Nurse Education Today. 2015; 35(2):e50–e54 2015. DOI: http://10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.016

Xafis V, Babidge W, Field J, Altree, M, Marlow N, Maddern G. The efficacy of laparoscopic skills training in a Mobile Simulation Unit compared with a fixed site: a comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 2606–2612. DOI: http://10.1007/s00464-013-2798-6

Bischof JJ, Panchal AR, Finnegan GI, Terndrup TE. Creation and Validation of a Novel Mobile Simulation Laboratory for High Fidelity, Prehospital, Difficult Airway Simulation. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016; 31(5): 1-6. DOI: http://10.1017/S1049023X16000534

Weinstock PH, Kappus LJ, Garden A, Burns JP. Simulation at the point of care: Reduced-cost, in situ training via a mobile cart. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009; 10(2): 176-181. DOI: http://10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181956c6f

Pena G, Altree M, Babidge W, Field J, Hewett P, Maddern, G. Mobile Simulation Unit: taking simulation to the surgical trainee. ANZ J Surg. 2015, 85(5): 339-43. DOI: http://10.1111/ans.12549

Kobayashi L, Patterson MD, Overly FL, Shapiro MJ, Williams KA, Jay GD. Educational and Research Implications of Portable Human Patient Simulation in Acute Care Medicine. Acad emerg med. 2008; 15(11): 1166-1174. DOI: http://10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00179.x

Tribe HC, HarrisA, Kneebone R. Life on a knife edge: using simulation to engage young people in issues surrounding knife crime. Advances in Simulation. 2018; 3: 20. DOI: http://10.1186/s41077-018-0079-0

Peters M, Godfrey C, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares C. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 2015;13(3):141–146. DOI: http://10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 2016; 5: 210. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement. JAMA. 2015; 313(16): 1657-1665. DOI: http://10.1001/jama.2015.3656

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.