Keywords
Medicalization
Humanizing-delivery
Natural-childbirth
Partería
Medicalización
Parto-humanizado
Parto-natural
Tocologia
Medicalização
Parto-humanizado
Parto-normal
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction: Birth has experienced changes in the understanding of childbirth as a natural process, making it amenable to interventions, such as those related to shorten the labor time by medication.
Objective: to describe the prevalence of the use of drugs, instruments, and protocols in the labor and delivery profile of assistance in a public maternity hospital that nurses low risk pregnancies.
Method: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, exploratory, and quantitative study with population (n=26 health professionals). The sociodemographic characteristics of nurses and doctors who provide direct assistance during childbirth were analyzed in addition to those related to the use of medications, instruments, and protocols. Data were tabulated in the Epiinfo 7.2.2.2 program; then, a descriptive statistical analysis was performed.
Results: it was observed that 53.8% are obstetric nurses and 46.2% are obstetricians. Among the interviewees: 65.4% assured that they always or almost always completed the partograph, 61.6% always or almost always applied the Bishop index, 57.7% used medication to induce labor. The prevalence of professionals who stated that there were no childbirth care protocols in the institution totaled 80.8%.
Conclusion: the present study was relevant to demonstrate that most professionals did not use drugs for labor induction; they considered the integrity of the membranes before these drugs; and, when induction was needed, there was a higher prevalence of the use of oxytocin in relation to misoprostol in cases with the same conditions of the uterine cervix. Most professionals said that they still use childbirth care protocols although they are not institutional.
References
Azevedo AS de, Moreira MA, Sabry SD, Pessoa ÚML, Carvalho EM, Nascimento SL do. Postpartum women’s perspectives on the quality of labor and delivery care. Rev Med da UFC [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2021 Abr 14];60(1):28–34. Disponível em: http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistademedicinadaufc/article/view/40344/100226.
Lucena TS, Santos AAP, Morais RJL. Analysis of partogram completion as good obstetric practice in the monitoring of labor. R Pesq Cuid Fundam Online[Internet]. 2019 jan/mar [citado 2018 fev 13];11(1):222-7. Disponível em: http://seer.unirio.br/index.php/cuidadofundamental/article/view/7003.
Silva AP da, Romero RT, Bragantine A, Barbieri AADM, Lago MTG. The indications for cesarean sections in Brazil: a review of the integrative literature. REAS [Internet]. 2019 [citado 2019 out 21];24(e624). Disponível em: https://acervomais.com.br/index.php/saude/article/view/624/498.
Nicida ARA, Teixeira LAS, Rodrigues AP, Bonan C. Medicalization of childbirth: the meanings attributed by the literature on childbirth care in Brazil. Cien Saúde Colet [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2021 abr 10];25(11):4531 4546. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320202511.00752019.
Scapin SQ, Gregório VRP, Collaço VS, Knobel R. Induccíon del parto em um hospital universitário: métodos y resultados. Text Contex Enferm [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2019 Mar 25]; 27(1): e0710016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072018000710016.
Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos, Departamento de Gestão e Incorporação de Tecnologias em Saúde. Diretrizes nacionais de assistência ao parto normal: versão resumida [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2017 [citado 2021 abr 05]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/diretrizes_nacionais_assistencia_parto_normal.pdf.
Pfützenreuter GR, Cavalieri JC, Fragoso APO, Corregio KS, Freitas PF, Trapani JA. Factors Associated with Intrapartum Cesarean Section in Women Submitted to Labor Induction. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet [Internet]. 2019 jun [citado 2019 dez 15];41(6):363-370. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688966.
Medeiros AB; Freire LS; Santos FR; Silva BCO; Batista VGFM; Menezes M. Partograph: A Monitoring Tool in Multidisciplinary Care. Rev Cuidarte [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2021 mar 24]; 11(3): e1046. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.1046.
World Health Organization. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Technical Working Group, World Health Organization Birth [Internet]. 1996 [citado 2021 abr 01];24(2):121-3. Disponível em: https://www.mhtf.org/document/care-in-normal-birth-a-practical-guide/.
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience [Internet]. 2018[citado 2021 abr 02]. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.pdf.
Brasil. Lei nº 17.097, de 17 de janeiro de 2017. Dispõe sobre a implantação de medidas de informação e proteção à gestante e parturiente contra a violência obstétrica no Estado de Santa Catarina. Diário Oficial do Estado de Santa Catarina. 2017 jan 17 [citado 2021 abr 04]. Disponível em: http://leis.alesc.sc.gov.br/html/2017/17097_2017_lei.html.
Pereira SB, Diaz CMG, Backes MTS, Ferreira CLL, Backes DS. Good practices of labor and birth care from the perspective of health professionals. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2019 jan 20];71(Suppl 3):1313-9.Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0661.
Lima F, Martins CA, Mattos DV, Martins KA. Permanent health education as a strengthening of obstetric nursing. Rev Enferm UFPE [Internet]; 2018 Fev [cited 2019 Jan 20]; 12(2):391-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v12i2a23550p391-397-2018.
Melo LPT, Doudou, HD, Rodrigues ARM, Silveira MAM, Barbosa EMG, Rodrigues DP. Práticas de profissionais de saúde na assistência ao parto e nascimento. Rev RENE [Internet]. 2017 fev [citado 2018 mar 18];18(1):59-67. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/reben/a/XYksDZmcHxdFTppBV87bxrn/?lang=pt&format=pdf#:~:text=Granada)-,As%20boas%20pr%C3%A1ticas%20de%20aten%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20ao%20parto%20e%20ao%20nascimento,mas%20tamb%C3%A9m%20na%20inclus%C3%A3o%20da.
Lansky S, Souza KV, Peixoto ERM, Oliveira BJ, Diniz CSG, Vieira NF et al. Obstetric violence: influences of the Senses of Birth exhibition in pregnant women childbirth experience. Cien Saúde Colet [Internet]. 2019 [citado 2020 jan 20];24(8):2811-2824. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31389530/.
Andrade PON, Silva JQP, Diniz CMM, Caminha MFC. Fatores associados à violência obstétrica na assistência ao parto vaginal em uma maternidade de alta complexidade em Recife, Pernambuco. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. [Internet]. 2016 mar [citado 2021 abr 11]; 16(1):29-37. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042016000100004.
Meijer M, Brandão T, Cañadas S, Falcon K. Components of obstetric violence in health facilities in Quito, Ecuador: A descriptive study on information, accompaniment, and position during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [Internet]. 2020 mar [citado 2021 abr 10]; 148(3):355-360. Disponível em: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ijgo.13075.
Instituto para Práticas Seguras no Uso de Medicamentos (ISMP). Medicamentos potencialmente perigosos de uso hospitalar e ambulatorial: Listas atualizadas 2019. Boletim ISMP Brasil. 2019 [citado 2021abr 04];8(1):1-9. Disponível em: https://www.ismp-brasil.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/615-boletim-ismp-fevereiro-2019.pdf.
Lara SRG, Oliveira RF. Use of the Krause method and prostaglandins in the induction of labor in pregnant women with a viable fetus. Nursing [Internet]; jan.2019. [citado 2021 abr 05];22(248):2577-2582. Disponível em: http://www.revistanursing.com.br/revistas/248/pg29.pdf.
Melo R, Amando A, Costa L, Araújo M, Moraes RJ, Fernandes FE. Vivência de puérperas no processo de indução do trabalho de parto. REAID [Internet]. 29 jun 2020 [citado 2021 abr 05];92(30). Disponível em: https://revistaenfermagematual.com/index.php/revista/article/view/660.
Federação Internacional de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FIGO). Recomendação para uso de misoprostol da FIGO. FIGO [Internet]. 2017 [citado 2020 abr 04]. Disponível em: https://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/FIGO%20Dosage%20Chart%20%20-%20PORTUGUESE.pdf.
Scapin SQ, Gregório VRP, Collaço V, Knobel R. Inducción del parto em um hospital universitário: métodos y resultados. Text Context Enfer [Internet]. 2018 [citado2021 abr 13];27(1): e0710016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072018000710016.
Nucci M, Nakano AR, Teixeira LA. Ocitocina sintética e a aceleração do parto: reflexões sobre a síntese e o início do uso da ocitocina em obstetrícia no Brasil. Hist Cienc Saude-Manguinhos [Internet]. 2018 dez [citado 2021 abr 06]; 25(4): 979-998. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702018000500006.
Lucena TS, Morais RJL, Santos AAP. Analysis of partograma completion as good obstetric practice in the monitoring of labor. Rev Fun Care [Internet]. 2019 Jan/Mar [cited 2020 Mar 20];11(1):222-227. Disponível em: http://seer.unirio.br/index.php/cuidadofundamental/article/view/7003.
Pereira LR, Carvalho MF, Santos JS, Machado GAB, Maia MAC, Andrade, RD. Avaliação de procedimentos operacionais padrão implantados em um serviço de saúde. Arq Ciênc da Saúde, [S.l.]. 2017 dez [citado 2018 fev 08];24(4):47-51. ISSN 2318-3691. Disponível em: https://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2019/12/1046771/a9.pdf.
Comments
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Alessandra Guimarães Aquino, Juliana de Souza Montenegro Lima, Luiziane Souza Vasconcelos de Lima, Luis Davi Alves Lima, Hérika Dantas Modesto