Palabras clave
ontologies
dictionaries
descriptive algorithm
lightly codified meanings
Cómo citar
Resumen
One problem at the linguistic preprocessing stage has to do with the concepts included in existing linguistic models. Part of the problem of codifying ontological and contextual information focuses on the lack of differentiation between communication and cognition that some linguistic models present. Besides, there are some described linguistic concepts that are lightly marked and which lack enough empirical textual, lexical or grammatical evidence that support them.
Because a unified linguist model able to account for ontological and contextual information is not yet available, a simpler mechanism capturing linguistic, ontological and contextual information can be simpler at a preprocessing stage. Instead of using whole linguistic models, it is explained here how an algorithm describing the components that make up linguistic codification can be used to facilitate precomputational codification. This algorithm is based on the structural similarity of the grammar of a language, the ontology supporting it and the proper descriptive algorithm. Finally, the use of this algorithm illustrates how to extract this information from a corpus.
Citas
Apresjan, J. D. 2008. “Principles of Systematic Lexicography”. In: Thierry Fontenelle (Ed). Practical Lexicography. A Reader. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Butler, C. 2012. “An ontological approach to the representational lexicon in Functional Discourse Grammar”. In: Language Sciences XXXIV (5): 619-634.
Butler, C. S. and J. Arista, Eds. 2009. Deconstructing constructions (Vol. 107). John Benjamins Publishing.
Caballero, R. 2007. “Manner of motion verbs in wine description”. In: Journal of Pragmatics XXXIX: 2095-2114.
Caballero, R. and C. Paradis. 2015. “Making sense of sensory perceptions across lan- guages and cultures”. In: Functions of Language, XXII (1): 1-19.
Clark, R. and P Parikh. 2007. “Game theory and discourse anaphora”. In: Journal of Logic Language and Information. (2007) XVI: 265. doi:10.1007/s10849-006-9037-7
Connolly, J.H. 2007. “Context in functional dis- course grammar”. In: Alfa. Sao Paulo. LI (2): 11-33.
Connoly, J.H. 2011. “The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model”. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Contextual Component in Funcional Discourse Grammar. University of Barcelona, Spain, 8-9-September, 2011.
Coseriu, E. 1973. Teoría del lenguaje y lingüísti- ca general (Vol. 1). Madrid: Gredos.
Coseriu, E. and M. M. Hernández. 1977. Principios de semántica estructural.(Vol. 259). Madrid: Gredos.
Coseriu, E. 1978. Gramática, semántica, univer- sales: estudios de lingüística funcional. Madrid: Gredos.
Cruse, D. A. (Ed.). 2002. Lexicology: an interna- tional handbook on the nature and struc- ture of words and vocabularies. (Vol. 21). Walter de Gruyter.
Dik, S. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The Structure of the Clause. Foris Publications. Dordrecht- Holland/Providence RI– USA.
Dik, S. C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar: Part 2: Complex and derived constructions. Hrsg. von Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Fellbaum, C. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fontenelle, T. 2008. Practical lexicography: a reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goded Rambaud, M. and R. Jimenez Briones. 2002. “Lexical-semantic explorations in English verbs of physical contact: Iconicity and linguistic representations”. In Mairal, R and M.J. Pérez-Quintero (eds). New Perspectives in argument structure in Functional Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pags.: 303-327.
Goded Rambaud, M. 2007. “Un algoritmo descriptivo para un corpus léxico sobre cata de vinos”. In: Actas de los xii Encuentros Internacionales sobre Sistemas de Información y Documentación (IBERSID 2007): 313-321.
Goded Rambaud, M. 2008. La percepción sensorial y el léxico de la comida y la bebida en inglés y en español. Festschrift volume in honor of Asunción Alba Pelayo. Madrid: UNED University Press.
Goded Rambaud, M. 2009. “A descriptive algo- rithm for a wine tasting lexicon corpus”. In: Scire: Journal of information and documentation systems. XV (2): 39-62.
Goded Rambaud, M. and A. Poves. 2010. (Eds)
Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Linguistic Approaches to Food and Wine Description: 57-72. Madrid: UNED.
Goded Rambaud, M. 2010. “Can taggers and disambiguators be theory free?: the search for a uni- fied approach in lexical representation”. In: Modos y formas de la comunicación humana (pags. 1091-1102). Servicio de Publicaciones. Universidad de Castilla La Mancha.
Goded Rambaud, M. 2012. “Intersubjectivy and persuasion in wine tasting notes”. Paper presented at the Workshop on Modality, Corpus, Discourse at the University of Lund. June 2012.
Goded Rambaud, M. and A. Ibáñez Moreno. 2012. “El desarrollo de un etiquetador semántico-cognitivo para el procesamiento de las entradas léxicas de un corpus de notas de cata de vino”. In: Vino y alimen- tación: estudios humanísticos y cientí- ficos. Universidad de La Rioja: pags.: 181-196.
Goded Rambaud, M. 2015. The Codification of Meaning in English. Madrid: McGrawHill.
Goded Rambaud, M., A. Ibáñez, and V. Hoste. 2015. On the Arquitecture of Words. Applications of Meaning Studies. Madrid: UNED University Press.
Grisham, R. 1986. Computational Linguistics. An Introduction. GB: Cambridge University Press.
Hengeveld, K., and L. Mackencie. 2008.
Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically Bases Theory of Language Structure. Oxford and New York: OUP.
Hommerberg, C. 2011. Persuasiveness in the discourse of wine: The rhetoric of Robert Parker. Doctoral Thesis. Växjö, Kalmar, Linnaeus University Press. 262.
Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competen- ce. Sociolinguistics: 269-293.
Katz, J. J. 1972. Semantic theory. New York: Harper & Row.
Kerren, A. et al. (2011, July). “Visualization of sensory perception descriptions”. In 2011 15th International Conference on Information Visualisation: 135-144. IEEE.
Kreidler, C. W.1998. Introducing English seman- tics. Psychology Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II Descriptive Application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Lehrer, A. 2002. “Paradigmatic relations of exclu- sion and opposition I: Gradable antonymy and complementarity”. In Cruse, D. A. (Ed.). (2002). Lexicology: an international handbook on the nature and structure of words and vocabularies. XXI: 498-507. Walter de Gruyter.
Lehrer, A. 1975. “Talking about wine”. Language 51(4): 901-923.
Lehrer, A. J. 1983. Wine and conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lehrer, A. J. 1985. “Is semantics perception- driven or network-driven?” In: Australian Journal of Linguistics. V (2): 197-209.
Lehrer, A. and E. F. Kittay. 1992 Frames, Fields and Contrasts. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Lyons, J. 1995. Linguistic Semantics. An Introduction. Cambridge USA. Melbourne Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Mairal Usón, R. y P. Faber. 2002. “Functional Grammar and Lexical Templates”. In: R. Mairal y M.J. Pérez Quintero (eds.) New perspectives on predicate argument structure in Functional Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 41-98.
Mairal Usón, R. y F. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2008. “Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction”. In: Ch. Butler y J. Martín Arista (eds.) Deconstructing Constructions. Ámsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 153-198.
Mairal, R and M. J. Pérez-Quintero (ed.). 2002.
New Perspectives in argument structu- re in Functional Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mel’čuk, I. and A. Polguere. 1987. “A Formal Lexicon in the Meaning Text Theory: (Or How to Do Lexica with Words). In: Computational Linguistics XIII (3-4): 261-275 .MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA
Mitkov, R. 2003. The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
Niremburg, S. and V. Raskin. 2004. Ontological Semantics. Cambridge, Massachusets. London, England: MIT Press.
Nuyts, J. 2001a. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-prag- matic perspective (Vol. 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Nuyts, J. 2001b. “Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expres- sions”. In: Journal of Pragmatics XXX: 383-400.
Nuyts, J. 2004. “Remarks on layering in a cognitive-functional language production model”. In: FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR SERIES: 275-298.
Nuyts, J. 2007. “Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics”. In: D.Geeraerts,
H.Cuyckens (eds.), Handbook of cogniti- ve linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 543-565.
Nuyts, J. 2012. “Notions of (inter)subjectivity”. In: English Text Construction V: 53-76.
Parker, R. See The Wine Advocate /The Wine Expectator.
Paradis, C. 2005. “Ontologies and construals in lexical semantics”. In: Axiomathes XV (4): 541-573.
Paradis, C. 2008. “Configurations, construals and change: expressions of DEGREE”. In: English Language and Linguistics XII (02): 317-343.
Paradis, C. 2009. “This beauty should drink well for 10–12 years: a note on recommenda- tions as semantic middles”. In: Text & Talk- An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies XXIX: 53-73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Paradis, C. 2010. “Touch downs in winespeak: ontologies and construals in use and mea- ning making”. In: Goded and Poves (eds) Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Linguistic Approaches to Food and Wine Description: 57-72. Madrid: UNED.
Paradis C. 2011, “Visualization of sensory perception descriptions”. In: 2011 15th International Conference on Information Visualisation. IEEE.. In Kerren, Andreas, 2011. “Visualization of Sensory Perception Descriptions Proceedings”. 15th International Conference Information Visualisation. Editorial: IEEE: 135-144.
Paradis, Carita and Caroline Willners. 2011. “Antonymy: From convention to meaning- making.” In: Review of cognitive linguis- tics IX(2): 367-391.
Paradis, C. and M. Eeg-Olofsson. 2013. “Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews”. In: Metaphor and Symbol XXVIII (1): 22-40.
Parker, R. (2008). The Wine Advocate Rating System. Obtained from: https://www.ero- bertparker.com/sitesearch/rparker.aspx
Parikh, P. 2007 “Game theory and discourse ana- phora”. In: Clark, R. and P. Parikh. Journal of Logic, Language and Information XVI (3): 265-282.
Parikh, P. 2007. “Situations, rules, and con- ventional meaning: Some uses of games of partial information”. In: Journal of Pragmatics XXXIX (5): 917-933.Parikh, P. 2010. Language and equilibrium. Cambridge, Massachussets: The MIT Press.
Parker, R. 2008 Parker’s Wine Buyer’s Guide (7th ed.). Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432- 7199-8.
Peñas, A., and E. Hovy. 2010. “Semantic enrich- ment of text with background knowled- ge”. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 First International Workshop on Formalisms and Methodology for Learning by Reading: 15-23. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Periñan Pascual, C. 2012. “The situated com- mon-sense knowledge in FunGramKB”. In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics X (1): 184-214.
Periñan Pascual, C. 2013. “A knowledge-engi- neering approach to the cognitive cate- gorization of lexical meaning”. VIAL: Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics X: 85-104.
Periñán Pascual, C. and R. Mairal .2010. “La gra- mática de COREL: un lenguaje de repre- sentación conceptual”. In: Onomázein: Revista de lingüística, filología y traduc- ción de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (21): 11-45.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and R. Mairal Usón. 2008. Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning cons- truction: an introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica.
Saeed, J. 2016. Semantics. 4th ed. Singapore: WILLEY Blackwell.
Schalley, Andrea and Dietmar Zaefferer edts. 2007. Ontolinguistics. How Ontological Status Shapes the Linguistic Coding of Concepts. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.
Saussure, F. de. 1945. Curso de Lingüística General. Buenos Aires: Editorial Losada.
Sinclair, J. Ed. 1987. COLLINS COBUILD ENGLISH LANGUAGE DICTIONARY. London. Glasgow: Harper Collins Publishers.
Suárez Toste, E. 2007. “Metaphor inside the wine cellar: On the ubiquity of personification schemas in winespeak”. In Metaphorik de XII (1): 53-64.
Fontenelle. T.(Ed.). 2009. Practical Lexicography. A Reader. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Van Valin, R. D. and R. J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge University Press.
Vossen, P. 2003. Ontologies. In Ruslan Mitkov ed The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
Wine Spectator Press, New York, NY (1999).
Dictionaries used
COLLINS COBUILD ENGLISH LANGUAGE DICTIONARY. Glasgow: HarperCollinsManufacturing. ISBN 0 00 375021 3
LONGMAN Exam Dictionary. 2006. PEARSON. Longman. ISBN-13: 978-1-4058-1860-5