Abstract
Knowledge integration is seen as the ability to bring together diverse bodies of knowledge to solve complex problems and facilitate innovation. The aim of the text is to elucidate possible frictions, triggers and opportunities to promote integration processes among those responsible for Social Action projects as a strategy for social innovation in the academic context. The methodology involved the collection of information through two primary sources: firstly, interviews were applied to a sample of sixteen qualified informants, from the analysis of the information collected, a categorization is made, and the needs are condensed to identify twelve opportunities for "Outcome-Driven Innovation " (Ulwick, 2014). In a second stage of research these twelve opportunities were incorporated into a questionnaire in which a sample of twenty-five informants were asked to rate the degree of satisfaction and degree of importance using a Likert scale on each opportunity. At the same time, publications related to knowledge management and transfer were reviewed. The results of this exploratory identification show that some triggers for integration occur under emergent conditions, sense of duty and purpose. Peer collaboration occurs to the extent that the basic needs of security, perceived benefit and reciprocity are met. The quantification of results demonstrates the need to provide training and motivation to engage in integrative processes that result in greater innovation. Finally, considerations are raised for the prospective analysis of the case.
References
Acevedo-Correa, Y., Aristizábal-Botero, C. A., Valencia-Arias, A. & Bran-Piedrahita, L. (2020). Formulación de modelos de gestión del conocimiento aplicados al contexto de instituciones de educación superior. Información tecnológica, 31(1), 103-112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000100103
Acharya, C., Ojha, D., Gokhale, R. & Patel, P. C. (2022). Managing information for innovation using knowledge integration capability: The role of boundary spanning objects. International Journal of Information Management, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102438
Arboleda, C. A., Arias-Vargas, F. J., Betancourt-Cadavid, J. H., Garcés-Giraldo, L. F. & Sepúlveda, J. A. (2019). La innovación social y su articulación con el institucionalismo económico. Revista ESPACIOS, 40(40).
Ardalan, H. T., Scholten, V. y Van, B. C. (2020). The role of universities in inter-organizational knowledge collaborations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(2), 458-478. doi: http://dx.doi.org.pucdechile.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0545-x
Attah-Boakye, R., Adams, K., Kimani, D. & Ullah, S. (2020). The impact of board gender diversity and national culture on corporate innovation: A multi-country analysis of multinational corporations operating in emerging economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120247
Barbón Pérez, O. & Washington, J. (2018). Rol de la gestión educativa estratégica en la gestión del conocimiento, la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación en la educación superior. Educación Médica, 19(1), 51-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2016.12.001
Blanca Moya, E. (2020). Establecimiento de condiciones de evaluabilidad para los proyectos de Acción Social de la Vicerrectoría de Acción Social (UCR), modalidad de Extensión Docente [Tesis de Maestría]. Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. http://hdl.handle.net/10669/81899
Cabeza-Pullés, D., Fernández-Pérez, V. & Roldán-Bravo, M. I. (2020). Internal networking and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of knowledge management processes in university research. European Management Journal, 38(3), 450-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.008
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization science, 15(5), 555-568. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
Carlile, P. R. & Rebentisch, E. S. (2003). Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science, 49(9), 1180-1195. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1180.16564
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2017). Does diversity actually increase creativity. Harvard Business Review. https://www.cocares.org/s/DOES-DIVERSITY-ACTUALLY-INCREASE-CREATIVITY.pdf
Consejo Universitario. (2020). Políticas institucionales 2021-2025. https://documentos.cu.ucr.ac.cr/Politicas_Institucionales_2021-2025.pdf
Emiliozzi, A., Bressan, C. & Castro, M. (2018). Innovación, redes y gobernanza: un abordaje desde el desarrollo territorial. En E. Carniglia (Coord.), Un territorio desigual. Memoria y agendas de investigación para el sur de Córdoba (pp. 122-135). UniRío Editora. http://www.unirioeditora.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/978-987-688-314-6.pdf
Faems, D., & Subramanian, A. M. (2013). R&D manpower and technological performance: The impact of demographic and task-related diversity. Research Policy, 42(9), 1624-1633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.00
Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research policy, 35(2), 230-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.006
Gatica S. (2016). Innovación Social: Hacia una nueva aproximación del rol del estado. Reflexiones. Consejo Nacional de Innovación para el Desarrollo. http://www.cnid.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/0203_IS-TEXTO.pdf
Gatica, S., Soto, W. & Vela, D. (2015). Ecosistemas de innovación social. El caso de las universidades de América Latina. Ashoka. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341481035_ECOSISTEMAS_DE_INNOVACION_SOCIAL_EL_CASO_DE_LAS_UNIVERSIDADES_DE_AMERICA_LATINA
Hagemeister, M. & Rodríguez-Castellanos, A. (2019). Knowledge acquisition, training, and the firm's performance: A theoretical model of the role of knowledge integration and knowledge options. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(2), 48-53. doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.02.003
Madrigal, J. G. (2019). Proyecto EC, Proyectos para la exploración de la cultura tradicional artística Gamonal. https://www.so.ucr.ac.cr/es/proyectos?page=1
Manzini, E. (2014). Making things happen: Social innovation and design. Design issues, 30(1), 57-66. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00248
Maynard, C. (2015). Accessing the environment: Delivering ecological and societal benefits through knowledge integration – The case of water management. Applied Geography, 58, 94-104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.01.013
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E. & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969-1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279893
Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145.162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
Oficina de Planificación Universitaria. (2021). Plan estratégico Institucional 2021-2015. https://oplau.ucr.ac.cr/publicaciones/plan-estrategico-institucional/plan-estrategico-institucional-2021-2025
Oliva Figueroa, I. (2008). Conocimiento, universidad y complejidad: bosquejos epistémicos y metodológicos para una vinculación transdisciplinaria. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia), 34(2), 227-243. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0378-18442009001100013
Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B. & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500-509.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004
Pereira, V., Bamel, U., Temouri, Y., Budhwar, P. & Del Giudice, M. (2021). Mapping the evolution, current state of affairs and future research direction of managing cross-border knowledge for innovation. International Business Review https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101834
Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’regan, N. & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management,40(3), 428-461.
Piirainen, K. A., Andersen, A. D. & Andersen, P. D. (2016). Foresight and the third mission of universities: the case for innovation system foresight. Foresight, 18(1), 24-40. DOI:10.1108/FS-04-2014-0026
Pohl, C., Thompson, J. T., Hoffmann, S., Mitchell, C. & Fam, D. (2021). Conceptualizing transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process. Environmental Science & Policy, (118), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005
Rojas, M. G. A., Solis, E. R. R. & Zhu, J. J. (2018). Innovation and network multiplexity: R&D and the concurrent effects of two collaboration networks in an emerging economy. Research Policy, 47(6), 1111-1124. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.018
Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2019). The central role of knowledge integration capability in service innovation-based competitive strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, (76), 144-156. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.004
Szymańska, E. (2017). User-Driven Innovation–the concept and research results. Procedia Engineering, (182), 694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.182z
The Economist. (2016). Old problems, new solutions: Measuring the capacity for social innovation across the world. https://www.eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/Social_Innovation_Index.pdf
Tjörnbo, O. & McGowan, K. (2022). A complex-systems perspective on the role of universities in social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121247
Ulwick, A. W. (2014). Outcome-Driven Innovation®(ODI): Jobs-to-be-Done Theory in Practice. https://strategyn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Outcome-Driven-Innovation-Strategyn.pdf
UNESCO. (2009). World Conference on Higher Education. UNESCO.
Vicerrectoría de Acción Social (2022). Portal de Acción Social. https://accionsocial.ucr.ac.cr/
Vicerrectoría de Acción Social. (2020). Mapa de virtualización de proyectos de Acción Social, 2020. https://accionsocial.ucr.ac.cr/mapasvas
Vicerrectoría de Acción Social. (2021). Portal de Acción Social. Quiénes somos. https://accionsocial.ucr.ac.cr/quienes-somos
Villalobos, S. (2017), Laboratorio de Experiencias Creativas [Fotografía]. Archivo del proyecto.
Villalobos, S. (2018). Proyecto ED Etapa Básica de Artes Plásticas [Fotografía]. Archivo del proyecto.
Warnock, R. (2014). Harnessing the power of social innovation to drive the Northern Ireland economy: final draft. Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment (DETI).
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. DOI:10.1515/9783038212843.216
Westley, F. & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. Innovation Journal, 15(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2012.726005
Zhou, K.L. & Li, C.B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090-1102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1959
Zurbriggen, C. & Lago, M. G. (2020). Innovación y cocreación: nuevos desafíos para las políticas públicas. Revista de gestión pública, 3(2), 329-361. doi: https://doi.org/10.22370/rgp.2014.3.2