https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbtRevista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

Effect of species richness and vegetation structure on carbon storage in agroforestry systems in southern Amazon of Bolivia

Ernesto Gómez Cardozo, Guillaume Xavier Rousseau, Danielle Celentano, Heriberto Fariñas Salazar, Christoph Gehring



DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v66i4.32489

Abstract


Diverse agroforestry systems conciliate food production, biodiversity conservation, and the provision of ecosystem services as atmospheric carbon sequestration. However, the role of floristic richness in the production of biomass in these systems is not clear. This study evaluated the effect of species richness and vegetation structure on aboveground biomass carbon in different agroforestry systems in the Southern Amazon of Bolivia. For that, 25 agroforestry systems and 4 secondary forests were studied in the departments of Santa Cruz and Beni. In each system, a 1 963 m2 circular plot was installed, where the vegetation (trees, shrubs and herbaceous) and necromass (leaf litter, branches and dead trees) were sampled. Linear and logarithmic functions were used to evaluate the effect of vegetation richness and structure on carbon, and the variance partition was used to examine the pure and shared effect of the richness and vegetation structure variables on carbon. Regressions showed a positive strong relationship between species richness and carbon (r2 = 0.74; P < 0.001). The partition of carbon variance showed that richness, structure and variation of the structure explained 85.7 %. Alone the richness explained 12.7 %, the structure 8.8 % and the variation of the structure 4.8 %. These results confirm that carbon in the aboveground biomass increases with species richness and structural variation of the vegetation. Therefore, more biodiverse and stratified agroforestry systems are more efficient in the use of resources and can contribute with climate change mitigation.

Keywords


Biodiversity; biomass; allometric formula; Amazon; climate change mitigation

References


Albrecht, A., & Kandji, S. T. (2003). Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 99, 15-27. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00138-5

Ali, A., & Mattsson, E. (2017a). Individual tree size inequality enhances aboveground biomass in homegarden agroforestry systems in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. Science of the Total Environment, 575, 6–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.022

Ali, A., & Mattsson, E. (2017b). Disentangling the effects of species diversity, and intraspecific and interspecific tree size variation on aboveground biomass in dry zone homegarden agroforestry systems. Science of the Total Environment, 598, 38–48. DOI: 0.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.131

Ali, A., Yan, E. R., Chang, S. X., Cheng, J. Y., & Liu, X. Y. (2017). Community-weighted mean of leaf traits and divergence of wood traits predict aboveground biomass in secondary subtropical forests. Science of the Total Environment, 574, 654–662. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.022

Andrade, H., Segura, M., Somarriba, E., & Villalobos, M. (2008). Valoración biofísica y financiera de la fijación de carbono por uso del suelo en fincas cacaoteras indígenas de Talamanca, Costa Rica. Agroforestería en Las Américas, 46, 45–50.

Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Tupayachi, R., Anderson, C. B., Sinca, F., Carranza-Jimenez, L., & Martinez, P. (2014). Amazonian functional diversity from forest canopy chemical assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(15), 5604–5609. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1401181111

Atangana, A., Khasa, D., Chang, S., &Degrande, A. (2014). Major Agroforestry Systems of the Humid Tropics. En A. Atangana, D. Khasa, S. Chang y A. Degrande (Eds.), Tropical Agroforestry (pp. 49–93). Dordrecht, Holanda: Springer.

Borcard, D., Gillet, F., Legendre, & Legendre, P. (2011). Numerical Ecology with R.. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.

Brassard, B. W., Chen, H. Y. H., Cavard, X., Laganière, J., Reich, P. B., Bergeron, Y., … Yuan, Z. (2013). Tree species diversity increases fine root productivity through increased soil volume filling. Journal of Ecology, 101(1), 210–219. DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.12023

Brown, S. (1997). Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. Roma, Italia: FAO.

Brown, S. (2002). Measuring, monitoring, and verification of carbon benefits for forest-based projects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 360, 1669–1683. DOI:10.1098/rsta.2002.1026

Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., … Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401), 59–67. DOI:10.1038/nature11148

Cardinale, B. J., Matulich, K. L., Hooper, D. U., Byrnes, J. E., Duffy, E., Gamfeldt, L., … Gonzalez, A. (2011). The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany, 98(3), 572–592. DOI:10.3732/ajb.1000364

Cardozo, E. G., Muchavisoy, H. M., Silva, H. R., Zelarayán, M. L. C., Leite, M. F. A., Rousseau, G. X., & Gehring, C. (2015). Species richness increases income in agroforestry systems of eastern Amazonia. Agroforestry Systems, 89(5), 901–916. DOI:10.1007/s10457-015-9823-9

Caudill, S. A., De Clerck, F. J. A., & Husband, T. P. (2015). Connecting sustainable agriculture and wildlife conservation: Does shade coffee provide habitat for mammals?. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 199, 85–93. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2014.08.023

Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., Eamus, D., … Yamakura, T. (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocksrand balance in tropical forests. Oecología, 145, 87–99.

Chave, J., Réjou-Méchain, M., Búrquez, A., Chidumayo, E., Colgan, M. S., Delitti, W., … Vieilledent, G. (2014). Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global Change Biology, 20(10), 3177–3190. DOI:10.1111/gcb.12629

Chisholm, R. A., Muller-Landau, H. C., Abdul Rahman, K., Bebber, D. P., Bin, Y., Bohlman, S. A., … Zimmerman, J. K. (2013). Scale-dependent relationships between tree species richness and ecosystem function in forests. Journal of Ecology, 101(5), 1214–1224. DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.12132

Clark, J. S., Dietze, M., Chakraborty, S., Agarwal, P. K., Ibanez, I., LaDeau, S., & Wolosin, M. (2007). Resolving the biodiversity paradox. Ecology Letters, 10(8), 647-659. DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01041.x

Coomes, D. A., Allen, R. B., Scott, N. A., Goulding, C., & Beets, P. (2002). Designing systems to monitor carbon stocks in forests and shrublands. Forest Ecology and Management, 164(1–3), 89–108. DOI:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00592-8

Coomes, D. A., Kunstler, G., Canham, C. D., & Wright, E. (2009). A greater range of shade-tolerance niches in nutrient-rich forests: an explanation for positive richness-productivity relationships? Journal of Ecology, 97(4), 705–717. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01507.x

Davidson, E. A., de Araújo, A. C., Artaxo, P., Balch, J. K., Brown, I. F., C. Bustamante, M. M., … Wofsy, S. C. (2012). The Amazon basin in transition. Nature, 481(7381), 321–328. DOI:10.1038/nature10717

De Beenhouwer, M., Geeraert, L., Mertens, J., Van Geel, M., Aerts, R., Vanderhaegen, K., & Honnay, O. (2016). Biodiversity and carbon storage co-benefits of coffee agroforestry across a gradient of increasing management intensity in the SW Ethiopian highlands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 222, 193–199. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.017

Dı́az, S., & Cabido, M. (2001). Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16(11), 646–655. DOI:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2

Faria, D., Paciencia, M. L. B., Dixo, M., Laps, R. R., &Baumgarten, J. (2007). Ferns, frogs, lizards, birds and bats in forest fragments and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic forest, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(8), 2335–2357. DOI:10.1007/s10531-007-9189-z

Fauset, S., Johnson, M. O., Gloor, M., Baker, T. R., Monteagudo M., A., Brienen, R. J. W., … Phillips, O. L. (2015). Hyperdominance in Amazonian forest carbon cycling. Nature Communications, 6, 6857. DOI:10.1038/ncomms7857

Flombaum, P., & Sala, O. E. (2008). Higher effect of plant species diversity on productivity in natural than artificial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(16), 6087–6090. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0704801105

Gamfeldt, L., Snall, T., Bagchi, R., Jonsson, M., Gustafsson, L., Kjellander, P., … Bengtsson, J. (2013). Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature Communications, 4, 1340. DOI:10.1038/ncomms2328

Gehring, C., Denich, M., & Vlek, P. L. G. (2005). Resilience of secondary forest regrowth after slash-and-burn agriculture in central Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21(5), 519–527. DOI:10.1017/S0266467405002543

Gehring, C., Park, S., & Denich, M. (2008). Close relationship between diameters at 30cm height and at breast height (DBH). Acta Amazonica, 38(1), 71–76. DOI:10.1590/S0044-59672008000100008

Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31(1), 425–439. DOI:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425

Hooper, D. U., Adair, E. C., Cardinale, B. J., Byrnes, J. E. K., Hungate, B. A., Matulich, K. L., … Connor, M. I. (2012). A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature, 486(7401), 105–108. DOI:10.1038/nature11118

IPCC. (2000). Land use, land-use change, and forestry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC. (2003). Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jacobi, J., Andres, C., Schneider, M., Pillco, M., Calizaya, P., & Rist, S. (2014). Carbon stocks, tree diversity, and the role of organic certification in different cocoa production systems in Alto Beni, Bolivia. Agroforestry Systems, 88(6), 1117–1132. DOI:10.1007/s10457-013-9643-8

Justiniano, M. J., Peña-Claros, M., Toledo, M., Jordán, C., Vargas, I., Gutiérrez, M., & Montero, J. C. (2004). Guía Dendrológica de Especies Forestales de Bolivia (Vol. 2). Santa Cruz, Bolivia: BOLFOR.

Kumar, B. M. (2006). Carbon sequestration potential of tropical homegardens. In B.M. Kumar & P.K.R. Nair (Eds.), Tropical Homegardens (pp. 185–204). Dordrecht, Holanda: Springer.

Kumar, B. M., & Nair, P. K. R. (2004). The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry System, 61(1-3), 135–152. DOI:10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028995.13227.ca

Leite, M. F. A., Luz, R. L., Muchavisoy, K. H. M., Zelarayán, M. L. C., Cardoso, E. G., Moraes, F. H. R., … Gehring, C. (2016). The effect of land use on aboveground biomass and soil quality indicators in spontaneous forests and agroforests of eastern Amazonia. Agroforestry Systems, 90(6), 1009-1023. DOI:10.1007/s10457-015-9880-0

Loreau, M. (2000). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos, 91(1), 3–17. DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910101.x

Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J. P., Hector, A., … Wardle, D. A. (2001). Ecology: Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294(5543), 804–808. DOI:10.1126/science.1064088

Matocha, J., Schroth, G., Hills, T., & Hole, D. (2012). Integrating Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation through Agroforestry and Ecosystem Conservation. In P. Nair & D. Garrity (Eds.), Agroforestry - The Future of Global Land Use (pp. 105–126). Dordrecht, Holanda: Springer.

Mercado, L. M., Patino, S., Domingues, T. F., Fyllas, N. M., Weedon, G. P., Sitch, S., … Lloyd, J. (2011). Variations in Amazon forest productivity correlated with foliar nutrients and modelled rates of photosynthetic carbon supply. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366(1582), 3316–3329. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2011.0045

Müller, R., Müller, D., Schierhorn, F., Gerold, G., & Pacheco, P. (2012). Proximate causes of deforestation in the Bolivian lowlands: An analysis of spatial dynamics. Regional Environmental Change, 12(3), 445–459. DOI:10.1007/s10113-011-0259-0

Nair, P. K. R. (1993). An Introduction to Agroforestry. Londres, Reino Unido: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Nair, P. K. R. (2014). Agroforestry: Practices and Systems. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, 1, 270–282. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00021-8

Nair, P. K. R., Kumar, B. M., y Nair, V. D. (2009). Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 172(1), 10–23. DOI:10.1002/jpln.200800030

Nelson, B. W., Mesquita, R., Pereira, J. L. G., Garcia Aquino De Souza, S., Teixeira Batista, G., & Bovino Couto, L. (1999). Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management, 117(1–3), 149–167. DOI:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00475-7

Nogueira, E. M., Fearnside, P. M., & Nelson, B. W. (2008). Normalization of wood density in biomass estimates of Amazon forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(5), 990–996. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.001

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., … Wagner, H. (2015). Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.3-1. DOI:10.4135/9781412971874.n145

Pearson, T., Walker, S., & Brown, S. (2005). Sourcebook for land use, land-use change and forestry projects. Nueva York, EUA: World Bank.

Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(5), 1633–1644. DOI:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007

Pinho, R. C., Miller, R. P., & Alfaia, S. S. (2012). Agroforestry and the Improvement of Soil Fertility: A View from Amazonia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2012, 1–11. DOI:10.1155/2012/616383

Poorter, L., Bongers, F., Aide, T. M., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Balvanera, P., Becknell, J. M., … Rozendaal, D. M. A. (2016). Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature, 530(7589), 211–214. DOI:10.1038/nature16512

Poorter, L., van der Sande, M. T., Thompson, J., Arets, E. J. M. M., Alarcón, A., Álvarez-Sánchez, J., … Peña-Claros, M. (2015). Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24(11), 1314–1328. DOI:10.1111/geb.12364

Quesada, C. A., Lloyd, J., Anderson, L. O., Fyllas, N. M., Schwarz, M., y Czimczik, C. I. (2011). Soils of Amazonia with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites. Biogeosciences, 8(6), 1415–1440. DOI:10.5194/bg-8-1415-2011

Quesada, C. A., Phillips, O. L., Schwarz, M., Czimczik, C. I., Baker, T. R., Patiño, S., & Lloyd, J. (2012). Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest structure and function are mediated by both soils and climate. Biogeosciences, 9(6), 2203–2246. DOI:10.5194/bg-9-2203-2012

R Core Team. (2016). R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/

Rajab, Y. A., Leuschner, C., Barus, H., Tjoa, A., & Hertel, D. (2016). Cacao cultivation under diverse shade tree cover allows high carbon storage and sequestration without yield losses. PLoS ONE, 11(2). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149949

Reich, P. B., Tilman, D., Isbell, F., Mueller, K., Hobbie, S. E., Flynn, D. F. B., & Eisenhauer, N. (2012). Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science, 336(6081), 589–592. DOI:10.1126/science.1217909

Rousseau, G. X., Rioux, S., & Dostaler, D. (2006). Partitioning the spatial and environmental variation of Sclerotinia stem rot on soybean. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38(12), 3343–3358. DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.04.052

Schroth, G., Bede, L. C., Paiva, A. O., Cassano, C. R., Amorim, A. M., Faria, D., … Lôbo, R. N. (2015). Contribution of agroforests to landscape carbon storage. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(7), 1175–1190. DOI:10.1007/s11027-013-9530-7

Schroth, G., D’Angelo, S. A., Teixeira, W. G., Haag, D., & Lieberei, R. (2002). Conversion of secondary forest into agroforestry and monoculture plantations in Amazonia: Consequences for biomass, litter and soil carbon stocks after 7 years. Forest Ecology and Management, 163(1–3), 131–150. DOI:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00537-0

Segura, M., Kanninen, M., & Suárez, D. (2006). Allometric models for estimating aboveground biomass of shade trees and coffee bushes grown together. Agroforestry Systems, 68(2), 143–150. DOI:10.1007/s10457-006-9005-x

Van Wagner, C. E. (1968). The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. Forest Science, 14, 20–26.

Vargas, I., Mostacedo, B., & Jordán, C. (2005). Guía Ilustrada de las Principales Especies Forestales de Bolivia. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: IBIF,WWF.

Wang, W., Lei, X., Ma, Z., Kneeshaw, D. D., & Peng, C. (2011). Positive relationship between aboveground carbon stocks and structural diversity in spruce-dominated forest stands in New Brunswick, Canada. Forest Science, 57(6), 506–515. DOI:10.1111/oik.01525

Yamada, M., & Gholz, H. L. (2002). An evaluation of agroforestry systems as a rural development option for the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems, 55(2), 81–87. DOI:10.1023/A:1020523107243

Young, A. (1997). Agroforestry for soil management (2° ed). Wallingford, Reino Unido: CAB international.

Zanne, A. E., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Coomes, D. A. A., Ilic, J., Jansen, S., Lewis, S. L. S. L., … Chave, J. (2009). Global wood density database. Dryad, 235(February), 33. DOI:10.5061/dryad.234

Zhang, Y., & Chen, H. Y. H. (2015). Individual size inequality links forest diversity and above-ground biomass. Journal of Ecology, 103(5), 1245–1252. DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.12425

Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Y. H., & Reich, P. B. (2012). Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: A global meta-analysis. Journal of Ecology, 100(3), 742–749. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x

Zomer, R. J., Neufeldt, H., Xu, J., Ahrends, A., Bossio, D., Trabucco, A., … Wang, M. (2016). Global Tree Cover and Biomass Carbon on Agricultural Land: The contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets. Scientific Reports, 6, 1–12. DOI:10.1038/srep29987


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© 2017 Universidad de Costa Rica. Para ver más detalles sobre la distribución de los artículos en este sitio visite el aviso legal. Este sitio es desarrollado por UCRIndex y Open Journal Systems. ¿Desea cosechar nuestros metadatos? dirección OAI-PMH: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/index/oai