Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN Impreso: 0034-7744 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/oai
Effects of shade on guinea grass genotypes Megathyrsus maximus (Poales: Poaceae)
PDF
HTML

Supplementary Files

PDF DIGITAL APPENDIX
XML DIGITAL APPENDIX

Keywords

biomass
genetic diversity
leaf length
leaf width
plant height
shade tolerance
biomasa
diversidad genética
altura de planta
longitud de la hoja
anchura de la hoja
tolerancia a la sombra

How to Cite

Malaviya, D. R., Baig, M. J., Kumar, B., & Kaushal, P. (2020). Effects of shade on guinea grass genotypes Megathyrsus maximus (Poales: Poaceae). Revista De Biología Tropical, 68(2), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v68i2.38362

Abstract

Introduction: Light stress is an important factor limiting the biomass yield while combining forage production with crops or forestry. Guinea grass is a widely adapted perennial fodder grass. The species exhibits high degree of variation for morphology, adaptation and biomass yield. Objective: Since there is a need in identifying shade adapted forage grasses for the expanding area under agroforestry/silvipastures, the present investigation took the task of understanding how the morphologically distinct genotypes of guinea grass respond under different shaded intensities. Methods: In the present study, forty-four genotypes related with the shade response were studied in varying shading conditions (pure sunlight, 25, 50 and 75 % shade) created artificially. Results: Based on green and dry matter yields ranking, the genotype IG 01-98 performed the best followed by genotypes IG 01-92, IG 97-5, IG 97-6 and IG 01-89 in decreasing order. Particularly, IG 01-93 was identified as the best performing under 50 % shading conditions. On the other hand, most of the top ranking genotypes performed well both under open and up to 50 % of shade. Morphologically, these genotypes were taller and possessed longer and broader leaves. Under shaded conditions (over 50 %), leaf length and width showed an increasing trend compared to open conditions. Also, chlorophyll content increased with shading intensity. Conclusions: Most of the genotypes collected from the southern Indian humid tropical environment with early flowering nature were tolerant to shade. Differential genotypic response was observed for biomass yield and yield attributes under shade. The study established appreciable variability for shade tolerance among genotypes

https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v68i2.38362
PDF
HTML

References

Aganga, A.A., & Tshwenyane, S. (2004). Potentials of Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) as Forage Crop in Livestock Production. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 3, 1-4.

Anita, M.R., & Lakshmi, S. (2014). Growth characters of guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq.) under varying light intensity and potassium. In A.B. Khan (Ed.), e-Proceedings of International Conference on “Green India: Strategic Knowledge for Combating Climate Change: Prospects & Challenges” (pp. 338-342). Pondicherry, India: Excel India Publications.

Araujo, L.C., Santos, P.M., Rodriguez, D., & Pezzopane, J.R.M. (2018). Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass. Scientia Agricola, 75, 191-196. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2016-0413

Bogdan, A.B. (1977). Tropical Pastures and Fodder Plants. London, United Kingdom: Longman.

Cerovic, Z.G., Masdoumier, G., Ghozlen, N.B., & Latouche, G. (2012). A new optical leaf-clip meter for simultaneous non-destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll and epidermal flavonoids. Physiologia Plantarum, 146(3), 251-260. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01639.x

Deinum, B., Sulastri, R.D., Zeinab, M.H.J., & Maassen, A. (1996). Effect of light intensity on growth, anatomy and forage quality of two tropical grasses (Brachiaria brizantha and Panicum maximum var trichoglume). Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 44, 111-124.

Durr, P., & Rangel, J. (2000). The response of Panicum maximum to a simulated subcanopy environment. 1. Soil x shade interaction. Tropical Grasslands, 34, 110-117.

Eriksen, F.L., & Whitney, A.S. (1981). Effects of light intensity on the growth of some tropical forage species. 1. Interaction of light intensity and nitrogen fertilization on six forage grasses. Agronomy Journal, 73, 423-433.

Jain, A., Roy, A.K., Kaushal, P., Malaviya, D.R., & Zadoo, S.N. (2003). Principal component analysis in guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq.) germplasm. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources,16, 32-35.

Jain, A., Roy, A.K., Kaushal, P., Malaviya, D.R., & Zadoo, S.N. (2006). Isozyme banding pattern and estimation of genetic diversity among guinea grass germplasm. Genetic Resources Crop Evolution, 53, 339-347.

Kaushal, P., Malaviya, D.R., & Singh, K.K. (1999). Evaluation of exotic accessions of guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq.). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources,12, 215-218.

Kaushal, P., Malaviya, D.R., & Singh, K.K. (2000). Identification of shade tolerant genotypes and alterations in nutrient contents under shade in guinea grass. Range Management & Agroforestry, 21, 74-78.

Kaushal, P., Malaviya, D.R., Roy, A.K., Pathak, S., Agrawal, A., Khare, A., & Siddiqui, S.A. (2008). Reproductive pathways of seed development in apomictic guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq.) reveal uncoupling of apomixis components. Euphytica, 164, 81-92.

Kenwood, M.G. (1987). A method for comparing profiles of repeated measurements. Applied Statistics, 36, 296-308.

Kharrati-Kopaei, M., & Sadooghi-Alvandi, S.M. (2007). A new method for testing interaction in unreplicated two-way analysis of variance. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 36, 2787-2803.

Lowry, J.B., Lowry, J.B.C., & Jones, R.J. (1988). Enhanced grass growth below canopy of Albizia lebbek. Nitrogen Fixing Research Reports, 6, 45-46.

Malaviya, D.R. (1996). Distribution of morphological diversity among germplasm lines of Panicum maximum. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 9, 193-196.

Malaviya, D.R. (1998). Evaluation of Panicum maximum lines for sustained productivity. Range Management & Agroforestry, 19, 126-132.

Newaj, R., Rizvi, R.H., Chaturvedi, O.P., Alam, B., Prasad, R., Kumar, D., & Handa, A.K. (2017). A country level assessment of area under agroforestry and its carbon sequestration potential. Jhansi, India: ICAR - Central Agroforestry Research Institute.

Norton, B.W., Wilson, J.R., Shelton, H.M., & Hiu, K.D. (1991). The Effect of Shade on Forage Quality. In H.M. Shelton & W.W. Stilr (Eds.), Forages for Plantation Crops. Proceedings of workshop (pp. 83-88). Bali, Indonesia, ACIAR Proceedings No. 32.

Odedire, J.A., & Babayemi, O.J. (2008). Comparative studies on the yield and chemical composition of Panicum maximum and Andropogon gayanus as influenced by Tephrosia candida and Leucaena leucocephala. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 20(2), 27.

Parry, C., Mark Blonquist Jr., J., & Bugbee, B. (2014). In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship. Plant, Cell and Environment, 37, 2508-2520. DOI:10.1111/pce.12324

Pereira, V.V., da Fonseca, D.M., Martuscello, J.A., Cecon, P.R., Santos, M.V., & Braz, T.G.S. (2012). Biomass accumulation in mombasa guinea grass plants under different levels of nitrogen supply and plant densities. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41, 1118-1126.

Plucknett, D.L. (1979). Managing Pastures and Cattle Under Coconuts. Westview Tropical Agriculture Series 2. Boulder, United States: Westview Press.

Samarakoon, S.P., Wilson, J.R., & Shelton, H.M. (1990). Growth, morphology and nutritive value of shaded Stenotaphrum secundatum, Axonopus compressus and Pennisetum clandestinum. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 114, 161-169. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600072154

Singh, C., & Chaturvedi, O.P. (2011). Rehabilitation of degraded lands through silvipastoral systems – a balanced approach for alternative land use in the north-western Himalayas. In P. Panwar, A.K. Tiwari, & K.S. Dadhwal (Eds.). Agroforestry Systems for Resources Conservation and Livelihood Security in Lower Himalayas (pp. 273-296). New Delhi, India: New India Publishing Agency.

Stfir, W.W., & Shelton, H.M. (1991). Review of Forage Resources in Plantation Crops of Southeast Asia and the Pacific. In H.M. Shelton & W.W. Stilr (Eds.), Forages for Plantation Crops. Proceedings of Workshop (pp. 22-31). Bali, Indonesia, ACIAR Proceedings.

Sukhchain, & Sidhu, B.S. (1992). Correlation and path coefficients analysis for reproductive traits in Guinea grass. Euphytica, 60, 57-60.

Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I.M., & Murphy, A. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development. Sunderland, United States: Sinauer.

Wilson, J.R., Catchpoole, V.R., & Weier, K.L. (1986). Stimulation of growth and nitrogen uptake by shading a rundown green panic pasture on brigalow clay soil. Tropical Grasslands, 20, 134-143.

Wilson, J.R., Hill, K., Cameron, D.M., & Shelton, H.M. (1990). The growth of Paspalum notatum under the shade of a Eucalyptus grandis plantation canopy or in full sun. Tropical Grasslands, 24, 24-28.

Wong, C.C., & Wilson, J.R. (1980). Effects of shading on the growth and nitrogen content of green panic and siratro in pure and mixed swards defoliated at two frequencies. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 31, 269-285.

Wong, C.C., Sharudin, M.A., & Rahim, H. (1985). Shade tolerance potential of some tropical forages for integration with plantations. MARDI Research Bulletin, 13, 225-247.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Devendra Ram Malaviya, MIRZA JAYNUL BAIG, Bijendra Kumar, Pankaj Kaushal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.