REHMLAC +, Journal of Historical Studies of Latin American and Caribbean Freemasonry plus ISSN Impreso: 1659-4223 ISSN electrónico: 2215-6097

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rehmlac/oai
Divertimento alrededor de la masonería en el cine
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

Social representations; cinematography; conspiracy theories; visual arts; symbology.
Representaciones sociales; cinematografía; teorías de conspiración; artes visuales; simbología.

How to Cite

Aragón, R. (2018). Divertimento alrededor de la masonería en el cine. REHMLAC +, Journal of Historical Studies of Latin American and Caribbean Freemasonry Plus, 10(2), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.15517/rehmlac.v10i2.34761

Abstract

Despite not always having a lead role, Freemasonry has appeared many times on the big screen. Sometimes we see it in the form of a cameo, sometimes as an Easter egg, but Hollywood has capitalized on the interest and curiosity that this organization generates in the public and in order to improve the building of its characters or complement the stories told in its films. In this fast-paced journey, we will discover some of the representations of Freemasonry and Freemasons that have appeared in recent cinema, as well as the motifs –open or hidden–that justify their presence on the screen.

https://doi.org/10.15517/rehmlac.v10i2.34761
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

Bjelajac, David. American Art: a cultural history. Nueva Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2005.

Brunet, Lynn. “Homage to Freemasonry or indictment? The Cremaster Cycle”. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Arts 31, no. 1 (enero 2009): 98-112. https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/pajj.2009.31.1.98

Casebier, Allan. Film and Phenomenology: toward a realist theory of cinematic representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Danto, Arthur C. “The Anatomy Lesson. Matthew Barney’s Cremaster cycle”. The Nation, 17 de abril de 2003. https://www.thenation.com/article/anatomy-lesson/

Ditzler, Andy. “The epic ambiguity and cinematic genius of Matthew Barney’s Cremaster Cycle”. Artsatl, 19 de septiembre de 2010. https://artsatl.com/review-andy-ditzler-on-the-epic-ambiguity-and-cinematic-genius-of-matthew-barneys-cremaster-cycle/

Frichot, Hélene. “Matthew Barney’s Cremaster Cycle revisited”. Angelaki, 20, no. 1 (2015): 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1017376

Keller, Alexandra y Frazer Ward. “Matthew Barney and the Paradox of the Neo-Avant-Garde Blockbuster”. Cinema Journal 45, no. 2 (invierno 2006): 3-16.

Lechte, John. “Christian Metz”. Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers. Londres: Routledge, 1995, 77-81.

Mosley, Michael Josiah. “Another look at Heideggerian Cinema: cinematic excess, Antonioni’s Dead Time and the film-photographic image as copy”. Film-Philosophy 22, no. 3, (octubre 2018): 364-383. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/film.2018.0085

Tseng, Chiao-I y John A. Bateman. “Cohesion in Comics and Graphic Novels: an empirical comparative approach to transmedia adaptation in ‘City of Glass’”. Adaptation 11, no. 2 (agosto 2018): 122-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apx027

Winters, Ben. “The Non-Diegetic Fallacy: film, music and narrative space”. Music and Letters 91, no. 2, (mayo 2010): 224-244. https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcq019

Žižek, Slavoj. Enjoy your Symptom! Nueva York: Routledge, 2008.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.