Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in the Political Thought of John Rawls
PDF (Spanish)
HTML (Spanish)

Keywords

Rawls
Justice as fairness
Substantive justice
Procedural justice
Legitimacy

How to Cite

Solís Porras, Pedro J. 2025. “Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in the Political Thought of John Rawls”. Journal of Philosophy of the University of Costa Rica 61 (161). https://doi.org/10.15517/revfil.2022.50307.

Abstract

The relationship between procedural justice and legitimacy is addressed based on the political thought of John Rawls. The idea that this relationship is direct but not necessarily strong is defended. Rawls is criticized for not sufficiently recognizing the non-instrumental values of procedural justice that can serve to legitimize political processes. Finally, the proposed theses are nuanced in the light of empirical findings.

PDF (Spanish)
HTML (Spanish)

References

Baird, V. (2001). Building Institucional Legitimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice. Political Research Quaterly, 54 (2), pp. 333-354. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F106591290105400205

Ceva, E. (2012). Beyond Legitimacy. Can Proceduralism Say Anything Relevant about Justice? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15 (2), pp. 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.651018

Cody, S. & Koenig, A. (2018). Procedural Justice in Transnational Contexts. Virginia Journal of International Law, 50 (1), pp. 1-29. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3192116

Dahl, R. (1991). La democracia y sus críticos. Paidós.

Habermas, J. & Rawls, J. (1998). Debate sobre el liberalismo político. Paidós.

Lafont, C. (2003). Procedural justice? Implications of the Rawls-Habermas debate for discourse ethics. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 29 (2), pp. 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0191453703029002143

Magalhães, P. (2016). Economic evaluations, Procedural Fairness and Satisfaction with Democracy. Political Research Quaterly, 69 (3), pp. 522-534. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1065912916652238

Maldonado, M. (2016). Democracia, derechos y regla de mayoría: una mirada a partir de la teoría de Norberto Bobbio. Isonomía, 44, pp. 127-162. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-02182016000100127

Nussbaum, M. (2014). Una revisión de “Liberalismo político” de Rawls. Revista de derecho del estado, (32), pp. 5-33. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-98932014000100002

Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14 (3), pp. 223-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21763-2_10

Rawls, J. (2001). La justicia como equidad: una reformulación. Paidós.

Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.

Rawls, J. (2006). Una teoría de la justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Vidmar, N. (1990). The Origins and Consequences of Procedural Fairness. Law & Social Inquiry, 15 (4), pp. 877-892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1990.tb00607.x

Walters, G. & Bolger, C. (2019). Procedural Justice Perceptions, Legitimacy Beliefs, and Compliance with the Law: a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15, pp. 341-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9338-2

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Philosophy of the University of Costa Rica