Altoandina: new variety of forage oats for the Andean area in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v31i3.38999Keywords:
adpatation, Avena sativa, genotype environment interaction, forage productionAbstract
Introduction. The evaluation and selection of new fodder species with appropriate production and quality attributes is a safe and effective strategy to improve the efficiency of milk production systems in Colombia. Objective. To describe the development process and the main characteristics of Altoandina, a new variety of fodder oats. Materials and methods. During the second half of 2016, an agronomic assessment test (PEA) was carried out in four locations in the Altiplano Cundiboyacense subregion and in four locations in the Altiplano of Nariño subregion, in a randomized complete block design, with two genotypes of fodder oats AV25-S and AV25-T and three varieties (Avenar, Cajica, Cayuse). Results. AV25-S and AV25-T showed: tolerance to overturn unlike the three controls that showed a overturn of more than 30%, resistance to leaf and stem rust, and green forage performance of 64.6 and 65.3 t ha-1, respectively, higher than that obtained in Avenar (55.5), Cajica (43.7) and Cayuse (59.1). Conclusion. AV25-T for its tolerance to overturning, resistance to leaf and stem rust and green fodder yield superior to commercial varieties, was registered in the national cultivar system as a new fodder variety called Altoandina, with recommendation for the Cundiboyacense Altiplano and Nariño Altiplano.
Downloads
References
Arango, J., F.A. Cardona, A. López, G. Correa, y J.J. Echeverry. 2017. Variación de caracteres morfológicos del pasto kikuyo (Cenchrus clandestinus) en el trópico alto de Antioquia. CES Med. Vet. Zootec. 12(1):44-52. doi:10.21615/cesmvz.12.1.4
Berlín, A., B. Samils, A. Djurle, H. Wirsén, L. Szabo, and J. Yuen. 2013. Disease development and genotypic diversity of Puccinia graminis f. sp. Avenae in Swedish oat fields. Plant Pathol. 62(1):32-40. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012. 02609.x
Beyene, G., A. Araya, and H. Gebremedhin. 2015. Evaluation of different oat varieties for fodder yield and yield related traits in Debre Berhan Area, Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 27:170. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/9/gebr27170.htm (consultado abril 2019).
Bhatti, M.B.A., A. Hussain, and D. Muhammad. 1992. Potential for forage production of different varieties of oats under two cutting systems. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 13(2):184-190.
Carulla, J.E., y E. Ortega. 2016. Sistemas de producción lechera en Colombia: retos y oportunidades. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 24(2):83-87.
Crossa, J., P. Cornelius, and W. Yan. 2002. Biplots of linear-bilinear models for studying crossover genotype environment interaction. Crop. Sci. 42:619-633. doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.0619
Cuesta, P.A. 2005. Fundamentos de manejo de praderas para mejorar la productividad de la ganadería del trópico colombiano. Cinenc. Tecnol. Agropecu. 6(2):5-18. doi:10.21930/rcta.vol6_num2_art:42
DANE (Departamento de Administracion Nacional de Estadística). 2015. Encuesta nacional agropecuaria. DANE. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/agropecuario/enda/ena/2015/presentacion_ena_2015.pdf (consultado feb. 2019).
Gabriel, K. 1971. The biplot graphic of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrics 58:453-467. doi:10.2307/2334381
Garcés, A.M., L. Berrio, S. Ruiz, J.G. Serna, y A.F. Builes. 2000. Ensilaje como fuente de alimentación para el ganado. Rev. Lasallista Investig. 1(1):66-71.
Gollob, H.F. 1968. A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika 33:73-115. doi:10.1007/BF02289676
Gutiérrez, H.J. 1991. Clasificaciones climáticas. HIMAT, Bogotá, Colombia.
Haqqani, A, M., Z. Ali, S. Shafiqe, S. Zahid, and A. Baksh. 2003. Oats: A fodder of winter lean period. Agric-Digest. Zari Traqiati Bank Limited. 23:15-23.
Hussain, A., S. Khan, A. Bakhsh, M. Imran, and M. Ansar. 2010. Variability in fodder production potential of exotic oats (Avena sativa) genotypes under irrigated conditions. J. Agric. Res. 48:65-71.
ICA (Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario). 2000. Resolución 1985: Pruebas de evaluación agronómica. ICA. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/1e3dbbcd-e900-4c3d-9474-0c98dfbf5f48/2000R1985.aspx (consultado 5 abril. 2019).
IDEAM (Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales). 2017. Clasificaciones climáticas Colombia. IDEAM. http://www.ideam.gov.co/documents/21021/21789/climas+%5BModo+de+compatibilidad%5D.pdf/d8c85704-a07a-4290-ba65-f2042ce99ff9 (consultado abril 2019).
Keiper, F.J., M.S. Haque, M.J. Hayden, and R.F. Park. 2006. Genetic diversity in Australian populations of Puccinia graminis f. sp. avenae. Phytopathology 96(1):96-104. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-96-0096
Klink, K., J.J. Wiersma, C.J. Crawford, and D.D. Stuthman. 2013. Impacts of temperature and precipitation variability in the Northern plains of the United States and Canada on the productivity of spring barley and oat. Int. J. Climatol. 34:2805-2818. doi:10.1002/joc.3877
Laidig, F., H. P. Piepho, T. Drobek, and U. Meyer. 2014. Genetic and non-genetic trends of 12 different crops in yield tests of official German varieties and yield trends on the farm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127:2599-2617. doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2402-z
Leyva-Mir, S.G., E. Espitia-Rangel, H.E. Villaseñor-Mir, y J. Huerta-Espino. 2004. Pérdidas ocasionadas por Puccinia graminis f. sp. avenae Ericks. y Henn., causante de la roya del tallo en seis cultivares de avena (Avena sativa L.) en los Valles Altos de México. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 22:166-171.
Leyva-Mir, S.G., H.E. Villaseñor-Mir, M. Camacho-Tapia, G. D. Ávila-Quezada, E. García-León, y J. M. Tovar-Pedraza. 2018. Respuesta de genotipos de avena a la infección por Puccinia graminis f. sp. avenae en Valles Altos de México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 9:317-328. doi:10.29312/remexca.v9i2.1074
Lodhi, M.Y., I.B. Marghazani, K. Hamayun and M.J. Marri. 2009. Comparative performance study of different oat varieties under agro-climatic conditions of Sibi. J. Anim. Plant. Sci. 19(1):34-36.
Mamani, J., y F.H. Cotacallapa. 2018. Rendimiento y calidad nutricional de avena forrajera en la región de Puno. Rev. Investig. Altoandin. 20:384-400. doi:10.18271/ria.2018.415
Montaño-Carrasco, M., A. Hernández-Rodríguez, A. Núñez-Barros, y V. Guerrero-Prieto. 2017. Producción y contenido nutrimental en avena forrajera fertilizada con fuentes químicas y orgánicas. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 40:317-324.
Naeem, M. A.K. Muhammad, M. Shahid Munir Chohan, A. Hassan Khan, and S. Salahuddin. 2002. Evaluation of different varieties of oats for green fodder yield potential. Asian J. Plant Sci. 1:640-641. doi:10.3923/ajps.2002.640.641
Numan, Ali., Z. A. Muhammad, J. Tariq, F. M. Shamsher and A. Saleem. 2016. Assessing yield and yield associated traits of oat genotypes grown under the semi-arid conditions of Pakistán. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 16:1784-1789. doi:10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2016.1784.1789
Peterson, R.F., A.B. Campbell, and A.E. Hannah. 1948. A diagrammatic scale for estimating rust intensity on leaves and stems of cereals. Can. J. Res. 26:496-500. doi:10.1139/cjr48c-033
Ramos, A. 2017. Identificación de suelos del orden Inceptisol. Rev. Logos Cienc. Tecnol. 8(2):170-181. doi:10.22335/rlct.v8i2.304
Ramírez-Ordóñez, S., D. Domínguez-Díaz, J. Salmerón-Zamora, G. Villalobos-Villalobos, y J. Ortega-Gutiérrez. 2013. Producción y calidad del forraje de variedades de avena en función del sistema de siembra y de la etapa de madurez al corte. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 36:395-403.
SAS Institute Inc. 2003. User´s guide Version 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Semman, S., B. Eba, and T. Dinkale. 2018. Performance evaluation of improved oat varieties/accessions at the highland of Guji Zone, Bore, Ethiopia. J. Biol. Agric. Healthcare 8(17):21-26.
Singh, D., A. Chauhan, and A. Chaudhary. 2018. Relative performance of oat forage varieties for seed production, economics and fodder yield under central Gujarat conditions. Forage Res. 44(3):185-191. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.14349.38888
Sossa, C.P., y R. Barahona. 2015. Comportamiento productivo de novillos pastoreando en trópico de altura con y sin suplementación energética. Rev. Med. Vet. Zootec. 62:67-80. doi:10.15446/rfmvz.v62n1.49386
Terán-Chaves, C., G. Murcia, y A. García-Prats. 2014. Determinación de requerimientos hídricos para avena forrajera (Avena sativa L.) y raigrás (Lolium perenne) en la Sabana de Bogotá (Colombia). Rev. Fac. Nal. Agr. Medellín 67:1157-1158.
Vargas, J.J., A.M. Sierra., E.A. Mancipe., y Y. Avellaneda. 2018. El kikuyo, una gramínea presente en los sistemas de rumiantes en trópico alto colombiano. CES Med. Vet. Zootec. 13:137-156. doi:10.21615/cesmvz.13.2.4
Wise, R.P., and K.S. Gobleman-Werner. 1993. Resistance to oat crown rust in diploid and hexaploid Avena. Plant Dis. 77:355-358. doi:10.1094/PD-77-0355
Zadocks, J.C., T.T. Chang, and C.F. Konza. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415-421. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
