Economic and microbiological evaluation of towels and cloths used during milking

Uso de toallas y paños durante el ordeño

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v32i1.39667

Keywords:

Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, hygiene, mastitis, udder, microbiological load

Abstract

Introduction. The practices before milking help promote healthy udders and the productivity of the animals. Objective. To realize an economic and microbiologic comparison of the use of cloths and towels during the teats disinfection. Materials and methods. This research was carried out in Tilaran, Guanacaste, Costa Rica between October and November 2018, in a production system that performs three milkings every 8 h and keeps its animals in complete stabling. A random five towels to dry the teats before milking were taken, which were washed and reused in the next milking. The towels were cut in half, both sides were identified, the relationship between them was maintained, one part was stored in an airtight bag (used towel), and the other one was washed, and its reuse was simulated. After being washed, both parts (ten cloths) were analyzed to quantify the population of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and aerobes. For the economic analysis, the number of towels used per animal, the shelf life, the number of times used, the cost of each towel, water, electricity, chlorine, and liquid detergent were recorded. Results. The washing cycle used decreased 800 times of the population of Escherichia coli, by 5000 times the aerobes, and 500 times the Staphylococcus aureus. The paper towels analyzed had UFC g-1 lower than ten at the time of use. There is a similarity between the use of two towels/animal/milking with microfiber towels, and it rules out the use of three towels/animal/milking because it increases the cost by 48.59 %. Conclusion. There were no economic or microbial differences between the microfiber towels and the two paper towels used to dry the teats during the pre-selling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bramley, A. J., Dodd, F. H., Mein, G. A., & Bramley, J. A. (1992). Machine milking and lactation. InsightBooks.

Brown, W. B., Williamson, N. B., & Carlaw, R. A. (1988). A diagnostic approach to educating Minnesota dairy farmers in the prevention and control of bovine mastitis. Preventive Veteterinary Medicine, 5(3), 197–211. http://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(88)90005-0

Caselli, E. (2017). Hygiene: microbial strategies to reduce pathogens and drug resistance in clinical settings. Microbial Biotechnology, 10(5), 1079–1083. http://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12755

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities: Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). American Society for Healthcare Engineering, and American Hospital Association.

De-Koning, C. J. A. M. (2010). Automatic milking: A common practice on dairy farms. Precision Dairy Management. Recovered January 16, 2019 from http://www.precisiondairy.com/proceedings/s3dekoning.pdf

Diab-Elschahawi, M., Assadian, O., Blacky, A., Stadler, M., Pernicka, E., Berger, J., Resch, H., & Koller, W. (2010). Evaluation of the decontamination efficacy of new and reprocessed microfiber cleaning cloth compared with other commonly used cleaning cloths in the hospital. Amercian Journal Infection Control, 38(4), 289–292. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.006

Fox, L. K. (1997). Effectiveness of laundering udder cloth towels to reduce mastitis pathogens. Journal Dairy Science, 80(suppl. 1), 234.

Galton, D. M., Adkinson, R. W., Thomas, C. V., & Smith, T. W. (1982). Effects of premilking udder preparation on environmental bacterial contamination of milk. Journal Dairy Science, 65(8), 1540–1543. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82379-5

Galton, D. M., Petersson, L. G., & Merrill, W. G. (1986). Effects of premilking udder preparation practices on bacterial counts in milk and on teats. Journal Dairy Science, 69(1), 260–265. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80396-4

Galton, D. M., Petersson, L. G., Merrill, W. G., Bandler, D. K., & Shuster, D. E. (1984). Effects of premilking udder preparation on bacterial population, sediment, and iodine residue in milk. Journal Dairy Science, 67(11), 2580–2589. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81616-1

Gibson, H., Sinclair, L. A., Brizuela, C. M., Worton, H. L., & Protheroe, R. G. (2008). Effectiveness of selected premilking teat-cleaning regimes in reducing teat microbial load on commercial dairy farms. Letters Applied Microbiology, 46(3), 295–300. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02308.x

Instituto Metereológico Nacional. (2015). Clima en Costa Rica. El clima y las regiones climáticas de Costa Rica. Recuperado el 15 de mayo, 2020 de https://www.imn.ac.cr/documents/10179/31165/clima-regiones-climat.pdf/cb3b55c3-f358-495a-b66c90e677e35f57.

Jayarao, B. M., & Henning, D. R. (2001). Prevalence of foodborne pathogens in bulk tank milk. Journal Dairy Science, 84(10), 2157–2162. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74661-9

Koster, G., Tenhagen, B. A., & Heuwieser, W. (2006). Factors associated with high milk test day somatic cell counts in large dairy herds in Brandenburg. I: Housing conditions. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 53(3), 134–139. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2006.00801.x

Knowlton, K. F., Wilkerson, V. A., Casper, D. P., & Mertens, D. R. (2010). Manure nutrient excretion by Jersey and Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(1), 4073–412. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2617

Kusumaningrum, H. D., Paltinaite, R., Koomen, A. J., Hazeleger, W. C., Romboutsand, F. M., & Reumer, R. R. (2003). Tolerance of Salmonella enteritidis and Staphylococcus aureus to surface cleaning and house hold bleach. Journal Food Protection, 66(12), 2289–2295. http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-66.12.2289

Lavonen, E., Gonsior, M., Tranvik, L., Schmitt-Kopplin, P., & Kohler, S. (2013). Selective chlorination of natural organic matter: identification of previously unknown disinfection byproducts. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 2264–2271. http://doi.org/10.1021/es304669p

Moore, G., & Griffith, C. A. (2006). Laboratory evaluation of the decontamination properties of microfibre cloths. Journal Hospital Infection, 64(4), 379–385. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2006.08.006

Moxley, J. E., Kennedy, B. W., Downeyand, B. R., & Bowman, J. S. T. (1978). Survey of milking hygiene practices and their relationships to somatic cell counts and milk production. Journal Dairy Science, 61(11), 1637–1644. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(78)83778-3

Petrovski, K. R., Trajcev, M., & Buneski, G. (2006). A review of the factors affecting the costs of bovine mastitis. Journal South African Veterinary Association, 77(2), 52–60. http://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v77i2.344

Philpot, W., & Nickerson, S. (2000). Ganando la lucha contra la mastitis. Westfalia Surge Inc.

Radostits, O. M., Blood, D. C., Gay, C. C., Blood, D. C., & Hinchkliff, K. W. (2000). Veterinary medicine. 9th ed. ELBA-BailliereTindal.

Rasmussen, M. D., Galton, D. M., & Paterson, L. G. (1991). Effects of pre-milking teat preparation on spores of anaerobes bacteria and iodine residues in milk. Journal Dairy Science, 74(8), 2472–2478. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78423-3

Ruegg, P. L. (2003). The role of hygiene in efficient milking. Milking and milk quality No. 406. University of Wisconsin. Recovered March 10, 2019 from http://www.dairyweb.ca/Resources/Babcock/MilkingHygiene.pdf

Ruegg, P. L. (2011). Managing mastitis and producing high quality milk. In C. Risco, & P. Melendez, (Eds.), Dairy production medicine (Chapter 18, p. 207–232). Wiley-Blackwell. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470960554.ch18

Schepers, J. A., & Dijkhuizen, A. A. (1991). The economics of mastitis and mastitis control in dairy cattle: a critical analysis of estimates published since 1970. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 10(3), 213-224. http://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(91)90005-M

Schreiner, D. A., & Ruegg, P. L. (2003). Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. Journal Dairy Science, 86(11), 3460-3465. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73950-2

Scott, E., & Bloomfield, S. F. (1990). Investigations of the effectiveness of detergent washing, drying and chemical disinfection on contamination of cleaning cloths. Journal Applied Bacteriology, 68(3), 279–283. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb02575.x

Seegers, H., Fourichon, C., & Beaudeau, F. (2003). Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research, 34(5), 475–491. http://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2003027

Sordillo, L. M., & Streicher, K. L. (2002). Mammary gland immunity and mastitis susceptibility. Journal Mammary Gland Biology Neoplasia, 7, 135–146. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020347818725

Tebbutt, G. M. (1988). Laboratory evaluation of disposable and reusable disinfectant cloths for cleaning food contact surfaces. Epidemiology & Infection, 101(2), 367–375. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800054315

Trajtman, N. A., Manickam, K., & Alfa, J. M. (2015). Microfiber cloths reduce the transfer of Clostridium difficile spores to environmental surfaces compared with cotton cloths. American Journal of Infection Control, 43(7), 686–689. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.03.002

WingChing-Jones, R., Monge-Meza, J., & Pérez-Salas, R. (2009). Roedores pequeños en un sistema de producción de ganado lechero. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 20(1), 127–133. http://doi.org/10.15517/am.v20i1.4988

Younan, M. (2004). Milk hygiene and udder health. In Z. Farahandand, & A. Fischer, (Eds.), Milk and meat from the camel. Handbook on products and processing (p. 67–76). Verlag der Fachvereine Hochsch.

Published

2021-01-01

How to Cite

Varela-Vargas, M. J., WingChing-Jones, R., & Uribe-Lorío, L. (2021). Economic and microbiological evaluation of towels and cloths used during milking: Uso de toallas y paños durante el ordeño. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 32(1), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v32i1.39667

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>