Keywords
dynamical system
voting behavior
peer influence
media influence
cadena de Markov
comportamiento electoral
influencia de pares
influencia de medios de comunicación
How to Cite
Abstract
The 2016 U.S. presidential primary election, characterized by unexpected results, provides an interesting context to study how citizens are influenced in deciding whether to vote and whom to support. Our aim is to determine which of those changes in voting behavior have the largest impact on the election outcome. We address this question by developing a class of models driven either by the effect of mass media or by social interaction among voters and non-voting members of two parties. The dynamics are modeled using four compartments with a transition matrix describing the evolution of a discrete-time Markov chain. Each model is studied and fit to poll data from the 2012 and 2016 U.S. presidential elections using numerical methods. A comparison across elections indicates that the social influence of each group changes from one election to another, but response to media is similar in both cases.
References
ABC News, The Washington Post, ABC News/Washington post poll: 2012 presidential election, [Data set]. USABCWASH2012-1140, Version 2. Langer Research Associates/Abt SRBI, Inc. [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [distributor], September 2012, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
L. Arriola, J.M. Hyman, Sensitivity analysis for uncertainty quantification in mathematical models, in: G. Chowell, J.M. Hyman, L.M.A. Bettencourt & C. Castillo-Chavez, (Eds.) Mathematical and Statistical Estimation Approaches in Epidemiology, Springer, 2009, pp. 195–247. doi: 10.1007/ 978-90-481-2313-1_10
BBC News US & Canada, Did Clinton win more votes than any white man in history?, https://www.bbc.com/news/ world-us-canada-38254946, consulted on 16-Jul-2019.
L.M.A. Bettencourt, A. Cintrón-Arias, D.I. Kaiser, C. Castillo-Chávez, The power of a good idea: quantitative modeling of the spread of ideas from epidemiological models, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 364(2006), 513–536. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2005. 08.083
T. Bevan, C.M. Cannon, 21 reasons for Obama’s victory and Romney’s defeat, https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/ 2012/11/07/21_reasons_for_obamas_victory_and_ romneys_defeat_116090.html, consulted on 21-Jul-2016.
A. Blake, Two-thirds of Americans don’t like Donald Trump. That’s still stunning, https://www. washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/08/ a-record-number-of-americans-dont-like-donaldtrump-and-thats-very-important-to-remember/, consulted on 21-Jul-2016.
S.M. Blower, H. Dowlatabadi, Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models of disease transmission: an HIV model, as an example, International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique 62(1994), no. 2, 229–243. doi: 10.2307/1403510
P. Bump, Trump got the most GOP votes ever — both for and against him — and other fun facts, https://www. washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/08/ donald-trump-got-the-most-votes-in-gop-primaryhistory-a-historic-number-of-people-voted-against -him-too/, consulted on 14-Jul-2016.
Cable News Network, Breaking news, latest news and videos, www.cnn. com, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
Cable News Network,CNN: 2016 election results, https://www.cnn. com/election/2016/results, consulted on 16-Jul-2019.
C. Castillo-Chavez, B. Song, Models for the transmission dynamics of fanatic behaviors, in: H.T. Banks and C. Castillo-Chavez (Eds.) Bioterrorism: Mathematical Modeling Applications to Homeland Security, SIAM Series Frontiers in Applied Mathematics,155–172,2003.doi: 10.1137/ 1.9780898717518.ch7
CBS News; The New York Times, Live, breaking news today: latest national headlines, world news and more from CBSNews.com and watch the CBSN live news stream 24x7, www.cbsnews.com/, consulted on 15Jul-2016.
J. Clinton, J. Lapinski, M. Trussler, The economy or terrorism: which issue is most important to voters?, http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/ the-economy-or-terrorism-which-issue-mostimportant-voters, consulted on 21-Jul-2016.
L. Cook, What’s the top issue for 2016? Depends where you look, http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2015 /06/29/whats-the-top-issue-for-2016-depends-where -you-look, consulted on 21-Jul-2016.
R.S. Erikson, C. Wlezien, The Timeline of Presidential Elections. How Campaigns do (and do not) Matter, University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL, 2012.
J. Fernández-Gracia, K. Suchecki, J.J. Ramasco, M. San Miguel, V.M. Eguíluz, Is the voter model a model for voters?, Physical Review Letters 112(2014), no. 15, 158701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112. 158701
E. Fieldhouse, L. Lessard-Phillips, B. Edmonds, Cascade or echo chamber? a complex agent-based simulation of voter turnout, Party Politics 22(2016), no. 2, 241–256. doi: 10.1177/1354068815605671
A.S. Gerber, D.P. Green, R. Shachar, Voting may be habit-forming: evidence from a randomized field experiment, American Journal of Political Science 47(2003), no. 3, 540–550. doi: 10.1111/1540-5907.00038
M. Gold, A. Narayanswamy, D. Cameron, How much money is behind each campaign?, https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/ politics/2016-election/campaign-finance/, consulted on 11-Jul-2016.
A. Halu, K. Zhao, A. Baronchelli, G. Bianconi, Connect and win: the role of social networks in political elections, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 102(2013), no. 1, 16002. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/102/16002
N. Jackson, J. Velencia, Huffpollster: poll shows Hillary Clinton’s email woes aren’t over, http://www.huffingtonpost. com/entry/hillary-clinton-email-fbi-poll_us_ 57838e50e4b01edea78e82c3, consulted on 21-Jul-2016.
R.A. Jeffs, J. Hayward, P.A. Roach, J. Wyburn, Activist model of political party growth, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 442(2016), 359–372. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.09.002
W. Jennings, C, Wleizien, Election polling errors across time and space, Nature Human Behaviour 2(2018), 276–283. doi: 10.1038/ s41562-018-0315-6
E. Katz, The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report on an hypothesis, Public Opinion Quarterly 21(1957), no. 1, 61–78. doi: 10. 1086/266687
M. Laver, E. Sergenti, Party competition: an agent-based model, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 2012.
K. Liptak, Report shows turnout lower than 2008 and 2004, http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/08/ report-shows-turnout-lower-than-2008-and-2004/, consulted on 18-Jul-2016.
E. MacAskill, Mitt Romney comes out on top as Obama stumbles in first debate, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/ oct/04/romney-obama-first-presidential-debate, consulted on 21-Jul-2016.
B.B. Machta, R. Chachra, M.K. Transtrum, J.P. Sethna, Parameter space compression underlies emergent theories and predictive models, Science 342(2013), no. 6158, 604–607. doi: 10.1126/science.1238723
M.B. MacKuen, R.S. Erikson, J.A. Stimson, Macropartisanship, American Political Science Review 83(1989), no. 4, 1125–1142. doi: 10.2307/ 1961661
MathWorks, Fmincon documentation, https://www.mathworks. com/help/optim/ug/fmincon.html, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
K.O. May, A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision, Econometrica 20(1952), no. 4, 680–684.
S. Merrill III, B. Grofman, A unified theory of voting: directional and proximity spatial models, Cambridge University Press, New York NY, 1999.
Monmouth University Poll, Monmouth University Polling Institute, www. monmouth.edu/polling-institute/, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
D.W. Nickerson, Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments, American Political Science Review 102(2008), no. 1, 49–57. doi: 10.1017/S0003055408080039
B. Nyhan, J. Reifler, When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions, Political Behavior 32(2010), no. 2, 303–330. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40587320
G. Orr, CS-449: Neural networks, https://www.willamette.edu/ ~gorr/classes/cs449/intro.html, consulted on 10-Jul-2016.
T.E. Patterson, News coverage of the 2016 presidential primaries: horse race reporting has consequences, http://shorensteincenter. org/news-coverage-2016-presidential-primaries/, consulted on 11-Jul-2016.
Pew Research Center: Journalism & Media Staff, Winning the media campaign 2012, Pew Research Center, Technical Report, (2012). Available at: https://www.journalism.org/2012/11/02/ winning-media-campaign-2012/
Politico, www.politico.com/, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
Reuters News, Business & financial news, U.S & international breaking news, www.reuters.com/, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
D.M. Romero, C.M. Kribs-Zaleta, A. Mubayi, C. Orbe, An epidemiological approach to the spread of political third parties, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Series B 15(2011), no. 3, 707–738. Available at: https://mtbi.asu.edu/2005-2
R. Sago, B. Markus, J. Joffe-Block, Sick of political parties, unaffiliated voters are changing politics, http://www.npr.org/2016/02/28/467961962/ sick-of-political-parties-unaffiliated-voters-are -changing-politics, consulted on 18-Jul-2016.
N. Silver, Fivethirtyeight’s pollster ratings, http://projects. fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/, consulted on 05Jul-2016.
B. Song, M. Castillo-Garsow, K.R. Rios-Soto, M. Mejran, L. Henson, C. Castillo-Chávez, Raves, clubs and ecstasy: the impact of peer pressure, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 3(2006), no. 1, 249–266. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.249
D. Thompson, Who are Donald Trump’s supporters, really?, http:// www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/ who-are-donald-trumps-supporters-really/471714/, consulted on 14-Jul-2016.
P. Trubowitz, How the “Trump factor” came to dominate the 2016 election, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2016/01/29/ how-the-trump-factor-came-to-dominate-the-2016election/
TV News Archive, Presidential campaign 2016: candidate television tracker, http://television.gdeltproject.org/cgi-bin/ iatv_campaign2016/iatv_campaign2016, consulted on 11-Jul2016.
Washington Post, Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis, www.washingtonpost.com/, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
C. Wlezien, M.N. Franklin, The future of election studies, Electoral Studies 21(2002),no.2,157-160.doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00014-2
T. Wood, E. Porter, The elusive backfire effect: mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence, Political Behavior 41(2019), no. 1, 135–163. doi: 10. 2139/ssrn.2819073
D. Wright, Poll: majority disagree with not charging Hillary Clinton, https://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/11/politics/ hillary-clinton-fbi-charges-poll/index.html, consulted on 21-Jul-2016.
L. Zhu, Y. Wang, Rumor spreading model with noise interference in complex social networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 469(2017), 750–760. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.119
ABC News, The Washington Post, ABC News/Washington post poll: 2012 presidential election, [Data set]. USABCWASH2012-1140, Version 2. Langer Research Associates/Abt SRBI, Inc. [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [distributor], September 2012, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
L.Arriola,J.M.Hyman, Sensitivity analysis for uncertainty quantification in mathematical models (G. Chowell, J. M. Hyman, L. M. A. Bettencourt and C. Castillo-Chavez, editors), Mathematical and Statistical Estimation Approaches in Epidemiology, Springer, 195–247, 2009.
Cable News Network, CNN/ORC poll: 2012 presidential election/gun control/Syria, [Data set]. USORCCNN2012-007, Version 2. Opinion Research Corporation [Producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [Distributor], August 2012, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
Cable News Network, CNN/ORC poll: Presidential election, [Data set]. USORCCNN2012-WI1E, Version 2. Opinion Research Corporation [Producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [Distributor], August 2012, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
CableNewsNetwork,CNN/ORCpoll: Wisconsin presidential election poll # 1, [Data set]. USORCCNN2012-009, Version 2. Opinion Research Corporation[producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [Distributor], August 2012, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
CBS News, The New York Times, CBS News/New York Times poll: 2012 presidential election/issues impacting the election, [Data set]. USORCCNN2012-09A, Version 2. Opinion Research Corporation [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [Distributor], September 2012, consulted on 15 Jul-2016.
A. Halu, K. Zhao, A. Baronchelli, G. Bianconi, Connect and win: the role of social networks in political elections, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 102 (2013), no. 1, 16002.
Monmouth University Poll, National: all tied up in Monmouth poll, Obama 48%; Romney 48%, http://www.monmouth.edu/ polling-institute/reports/, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
Monmouth University Poll, National: Obama gains over Romney, incumbent has edge on handling foreign policy in wake of Middle East violence, http://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/ reports/, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
Monmouth University Poll, National: Romney Edges Obama in Monmouth Poll, post-debate: more voters like Romney, give him edge on key issues, http://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/ reports/, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
Monmouth University Poll, National: Romney leads in Monmouth poll, Republican holds momentum after second debate, http://www. monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
Monmouth University Poll, National: Ryan’s initial impact, presidential horse race remains tight, http://www.monmouth.edu/ polling-institute/reports/, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
T. E. Patterson, News coverage of the 2016 presidential primaries: horse race reporting has consequences, http://shorensteincenter. org/news-coverage-2016-presidential-primaries/.
Pew Research Center: Journalism & Media Staff, Winning the media campaign 2012, Pew Research Center, Technical Report, (2012).
Politico, George Washington battleground brushfire–week 1 #13560: weighted tables, September 24–27, 2012, http://images. politico.com/global/2012/10/bg_brushfire_tables_ oct12012.html, consulted on 05-Jul-2016. Politico, George Washington battleground brushfire–week 2 #13697: weighted tables, October 15–18, 2012, http://images. politico.com/global/2012/10/politico_gwbgp_oct22_ weightedtables.html, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
Politico, George Washington battleground brushfire–week 2 #13697: weighted tables, October 29–November 1, 2012, http:// images.politico.com/global/2012/11/politico_ gwbgptracking_nov4_weighted_tables.html, consulted on 05-Jul-2016.
Reuters News, Core political data, May 14–18, 2016, http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/ 2016ReutersTrackingCorePolitical5182016.pdf, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
Reuters News, Core political data, May 28–June 1, 2016, http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/ 2016ReutersTrackingCorePolitical60116.pdf, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
Reuters News, Core political data, June 4–8, 2016, http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/ 2016ReutersTrackingCorePolitical6082016.pdf, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
Reuters News, Core political data, June 11–15, 2016, http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/ 2016ReutersTrackingCorePolitical615.pdf, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
Reuters News, Core political data, June 18–22, 2016, http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/ 2016ReutersTrackingCorePolitical6222016.pdf, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
Reuters News, Core political data, June 25–29, 2016, http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/ 2016ReutersTrackingCorePolitical.pdf, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
Reuters News, Core political data, July 2–6, 2016, http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/ 2016ReutersTrackingCorePolitical7062016.pdf, consulted on 15-Jul-2016.
N. Silver, Fivethirtyeight’s pollster ratings, http://projects. fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/, consulted on 05Jul-2016.
TV News Archive, Presidential campaign 2016: candidate television tracker, http://television.gdeltproject.org/cgi-bin/ iatv_campaign2016/iatv_campaign2016, consulted on 11-Jul-2016