Población y Salud en Mesoamérica ISSN electrónico: 1659-0201

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/psm/oai
Marco conceptual para la evaluación de programas de salud
PDF (Español (España))

How to Cite

Montero Rojas, E. (2004). Marco conceptual para la evaluación de programas de salud. Población Y Salud En Mesoamérica, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15517/psm.v1i2.13935

Abstract

Evaluation, as a discipline, is an relatively new area of the Social Sciences, thus, its explicit incorporation in health programs and systems has appeared somehow late. This article presents elements of a conceptual framework to conceive and use the evaluation in health programs. Evaluation is defined as a tool for decision making, current tendencies and themes in the field are discussed, as well as key concepts such as program theory and needs assessment. Finally, a first approach to two key concepts in evaluation of health programs, quality and equity, is presented.
https://doi.org/10.15517/psm.v1i2.13935
PDF (Español (España))

References

Aday, L.A. et al. (1998). Evaluating the Healthcare System: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity. Chicago, Illinois: Health Administration Press.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Estados Unidos (2001). A Quick Look at Quality. Your Guide to Choosing Quality Health Care. AHCPR Publication No. 99-0012. Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/consum/qntascii/qntqlook.htm

Angeles, G. & Mroz T.A. (2001). A Simple Guide to Using Multilevel Models for the Evaluation of Program Impacts. Universidad de Carolina del Norte en Chapel Hill, The Carolina Population Center: MEASURE-Evaluation.

Baldridge National Quality Program, Estados Unidos (2002). Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence. Documento disponible en internet en www.quality.nist.gov

Bambas, A. y Casas, J.A. (2001). Assessing equity in health: Conceptual criteria. En Equity and Health: Views from the Pan American Sanitary Bureau. Documento de internet disponible en http://www.paho.org/English/DBI/OP08.htm

Bertrand, J. T. et al. (1996). Evaluación de Programas de Planificación Familiar con Adaptaciones para Salud Reproductiva. Universidad de Carolina del Norte en Chapel Hill, The Carolina Population Center: MEASURE-Evaluation.

Birch, K.; Field, S. & Scrivens, E. (2000). Quality in General Practice. Abingdon, Oxon, Inglaterra: Radcliffe Medical Press.

Bruce, J. (1990). Fundamental elements of the quality of care: A simple framework. Studies in Family Planning, vol 21, no. 2.

Carey, R.G. y Lloyd, R.C. (2001). Measuring Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A guide to Statistical Process Control Applications. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: American Society for Quality.

Cook, T.D. y Reichardt, Ch.S. (1995). Métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos en investigación evaluativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.

Chen, H.T. (1990). Theory Driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos, Estados Unidos (1998). “The Challenge and Potential for Assuring Quality Health Care for the 21st Century”. Informe.

Donabedian, A. (1980). The definition of quality: A conceptual exploration. En Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, vol. 1. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.

Mohr, L. (1995). Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation. Sage Publications.

OECD (1998). Review of the DAC Principles. http://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation

Restrepo, H.E. & Málaga, H. (2001). Promoción de la Salud: Cómo Construir Vida Saludable. Bogotá: Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Rossi, P.H.; Freeman, H.E. & Lipsey, M.W. (1999). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Sage Publications.

Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus. Cuarta edición. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Worthen, B.R.y Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.