Effect of different media and rooting substrates on the hardening-off process of transgenic rose
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v30i1.29541Keywords:
Rosa hybrida, culture media, soilless culture, acclimatizationAbstract
Introduction. In vitro culture allows the genetic improvement of rose (Rosa hybrida), however, the acclimatization of plantlets in solid sustrate is a difficult process, it leads to malfuntion of stomata in the plants and consequently low carbon dioxide assimilation. Objective. The objective of this research was to evaluate three in vitro rooting media and different substrates for ex vitro acclimatization through solid and liquid media of transgenic rose. Materials and methods. transgenic rose (Rosa hybrida L.) cv. Classy plants were obtained from somatic embryo that were cultured in vitro for two years and were subjected rooting in vitro and ex vitro followed by acclimation. For in vitro rooting three different medium and for the ex vitro experiments, seven different combination of substrate were used. The study was carried out between August 2012 to January 2013 in Centro de Investigación y Asistencia de Tecnología y Diseño del Estado Jalisco, A.C. Results. The results from the in vitro and ex vitro experiments showed that the best in vitro rooting medium was the MS medium with the addition of 30 g/l sucrose and 0.5 g/l activated charcoal. The substrate composed of 70% peat moss and 30% pearlite was found to be the best for ex vitro conditions obtaining 20% of rooting. The substrate with 25% humus produced the highest chlorophyll content, however, there was no rooting. Solid treatments produced a higher percentage of seedling survival, high average number of leaves per plant, high chlorophyll content and a better sprout quality than hydroponics. However, the survival rate was 40% in the absence of aeration and 0% with aeration after sixteen days of the experiment. Treatment without aeration did not show any rooting. Higher contents of organic matter in the rooting substrate and the presence of aeration in a hydroponic solution did not guarantee a greater survival during acclimatization. Conclusion. Higher contents of organic matter in the rooting substrate and the presence of aeration in a hydroponic solution may not guarantee a greater survival during acclimatization. The results represent an optimization in the acclimatization of plants and the establishment of hydroponic culture of rose.
Downloads
References
Abdolmohammadi, M., M.J. Kermani, H. Zakizadeh, and Y. Hamidoghli. 2014. In vitro embryo germination and interploidy hybridization of rose (Rosa sp). Euphytica 198:255-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1098-0
Amancio, S., J.P. Rebordao, and M.M. Chaves. 1999. Improvement of acclimatization of micropropagated grapevine: photosynthetic competence and carbon allocation. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 58:31-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006323129593
Ambros, E.V., O.Y. Vasilyeva, and T.I. Novikova. 2016. Effects of in vitro propagation on ontogeny of Rosa canina L. micropropagated plants as a promising rootstock for ornamental roses. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 17:72-78.
Arnold, N.P., M.R. Binns, D.C. Cloutier, N.N. Barthakur, and R. Pellerin. 1995. Auxins, salts concentrations, and their interactions during in vitro rooting of winter-hardy and hybrid tea roses. HortScience 30:1436-1440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.30.7.1436
Baig, M.M.Q., I.A. Hafiz, A. Hussain, T. Ahmad, and N.A. Abbasi. 2011. An efficient protocol for in vitro propagation of Rosa gruss an teplitz and Rosa centifolia. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10:4564-4573. d
Barber, J. 1994. Molecular basis of the vulnerability of photosystem II to light. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22:201-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9950201
Benson, E.E. 2000. Special Symposium: In vitro plant recalcitrance do free radicals have a role in plant tissue culture recalcitrance. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 36:163-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-000-0032-4
Cárdenas-Navarro, R., y L. López-Pérez. 2011. Propagación vegetativa de rosa: efecto del sustrato, luminosidad y permanencia de la hoja. Sci. Agropecu. 2:203-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2011.04.02
Das, P. 2010. Mass cloning of rose and mussaenda, popular garden plants, via somatic embryogenesis. Hort. Sci. 37:70-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/57/2009-HORTSCI
Dastyaran, M. 2015. Effect of humic acid and exogenous putrescine on vase life and leaf macro elements status of hydroponic cultured rose (Rosa hybrid cv. “Dolce vita”). Agric. Commun. 3(1):43-49.
Davoudi, M., L. Samiei, A. Tehranifar, and M. Shoor. 2015. The effect of medium and plant growth regulators on micropropagation of Dog rose (Rosa canina L.). J. Plant Mol. Breed. 3:61-71.
Dere, S., T. Günes, and R. Sivaci. 1998. Spectrophotometric determination of Chlorophyll- A, B and total carotenoid contents of some alga especies using different solvents. Tr. J. Bot. 22:13-17.
Díaz, L.P., L.F. Medina, J. Latife, P.A. Digonzelli, y S.B. Sosa. 2004. Aclimatación de plantas micropropagadas de caña de azúcar utilizando el humus de lombriz. RIA 33:115-128.
Domínguez-Serrano, D., R. García-Velasco, M.E. Mora-Herrera, M. L. Salgado-Siclan, y J.G. González-Díaz. 2016. La cenicilla del rosal (Podosphaera pannosa). Agrociencia 50:901-917.
Hoagland, D.R., and D.I. Arnon. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Circ. 347:1-32.
Hoitink, H.A.J., A.G. Stone, and M.E. Grebus. 1996. Suppression of plant disease by compost. In: M. de-Bertoldi, editor, The science of composting. Blackie Academic & Profesional, Londres, GBR. p. 373-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1569-5_35
Jabbarzadeh, Z., and M. Khosh-Khui. 2005. Factors effecting tissue culture of Damask rose (Rosa damascene Mill.). Sci. Hort. 105: 475-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.02.014
Jha, R. 2004. Role of in vitro propagation in the improvement of rose cultivars. Agric. Rev. 25:100-115.
Kamo, K., B. Jones, J. Bolar, and F. Smith. 2005. Regeneration from long-term embrygenic callus of the Rosa hybrid cultivar Kardinal. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 41:32-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2004599
Korban, S.S., K. Gasic, and X. Li. 2006. Rose (Rosa hybrida L.). In: K. Wang, editor, Methods in molecular biology, Agrobacterium protocols, 2/3. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ, USA. p. 351-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-131-2:351
Li, X., S.F. Krasnyanski, and S.S. Korban. 2002. Somatic embryogenesis, secondary somatic embryogenesis, and shoot organogenesis in Rosa. J. Plant Physiol. 159:313-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00688
Martin, K.P., D. Joseph, J. Madassery, and V.J. Philip. 2003. Direct shoot regenaration from lamina explants of two commercial cut flowers cultivars of Anthurium andraeanum Hort. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 39:500-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2003460
Murali, S., D. Sreedhar, and T.S. Lokeswari. 1996. Regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from peatl-derived calli of Rosa hybrid L. cv Arizona (hybrid tea). Euphytica 91:271-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033087
Murashige, T., and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant 15:473-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
Nhut, D.T., N.T. Don, T.T.T. An, T.P.T. Van, N.H. Vun, P.X. Huyen, and D.V. Khiem. 2005. Microponic and hydroponic techniques in disease-free chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum sp.) production. J. Appl. Hort. 7(2):67-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2005.v07i02.18
Ozel, C.A., and O. Arslan. 2006. Efficient micropropagation of English shrub rose Heritage under in vitro conditions. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 8:626-629.
Pati, P.K., S.P. Rath, M. Sharma, A. Sood, and P.S. Ahuja. 2006. In vitro propagation of rose-a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 24:94-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.07.001
Rajapakse, S., M. Hubbard, J.W. Kelly, A.G. Abbott, and R.E. Ballard. 1992. Identification of rose cultivars by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Sci. Hort. 52:237-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(92)90024-7
Rani, S., and J.S. Rana. 2010. In vitro propagation of Tylophora indica influence of explanting season, growth regulator synergy, culture passage and planting substrate. J. Am. Sci. 6:385-393.
Rout, G.R., B.K. Debata, and P. Das. 1991. Somatic embryogenesis in callus cultures of Rosa hybrid L. cv. Landora. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 27: 65-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048208
Rout, N.P., S.B. Tripathi, and B.P. Shaw. 1998. Effect of salinity on chlorophyll and proline contents in three aquatic macrophytes. Biol. Plant. 40:453-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001186502386
Salas, J.E., D. Agramonte, F. Jiménez-Terry, M. Pérez, R. Collado, R. Barbón, M. La-O, M. De-Feria, y M. Chávez. 2011. Propagación de plantas de Morus alba var. Criolla con el uso de sistemas de inmersión temporal. Biotecnol. Veg. 11:77-88.
Salekjalali, M., B. Jafari, and A. Tarinejad. 2011. In vitro multiplication of rose (Rosa hybrid cv. Baccara). American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 11:111-116.
Sallanon, H., M. Berger, C. Genoud, and A. Coudret.1998. Water Stress and photoinhibition in acclimatization of Rosa hybrid plantlets. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 34:169-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822783
Schneider, F. 2005. Effect of different cultural conditions on micropropagartion of rose (Rosa sp. L.) and globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.). Dr. Diss., Technische Universität Müncehn, GER.
Shaw, B.P. 1995. Changes in the levels of photosynthetic pigments in Phaseolus aurerus Roxb. exposed to Hg and Cd at two stages of development: a comparative study. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 55:574-580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196038
Singh, B. 2017. Hydroponic culture as screening technique for abiotic stresses. In: V. Paul et al., editors, Manual of ICAR sponsored training programme for technical staff of ICAR institutes on physiological techniques to analyze the impact of climate change on crop plants. ICAR, New Delhi, IND. p. 115-122.
Thien-Nghia, L., H. Thanh-Tung, N. Phuc-Huy, V. Quoc-Luan, and D. Tan-Nhut. 2017. The effects of silver nanoparticles on growth of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. “Jimba” in different cultural systems. Vietnam J. Sci. Technol. 55:503-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15625/2525-2518/55/4/9322
Vainstein, A., and H. Ben-Meir. 1994. DNA fingerprint analysis of roses. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:1099-1103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.119.5.1099
Vilchez, J., E. Ramírez, M. Villasmil, N. Albany, S. León de Sierralta, y M. Molina. 2007. Aclimatización de vitroplantas de zábila (Aloe vera L.) Burm. f): efectos del sustrato. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ) 24:57-61.
Wang, S.M., X.C. Piao, S.Y. Park, and M.L. Lian. 2012. Improved micropropagation of Gypsophila paniculata with bioreactor and factors affecting ex vitro rooting in microponic system. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 49: 70-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-012-9464-x
Xing, W., M. Bao, H. Qin, and G. Ning. 2009. Micropropagation of Rosa rugosa through axillary shoot proliferation. Acta Biol. Cracov. Bot. 52:69-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10182-010-0025-5
Zakizadeh, H. 2008. Somatic embryogenesis, transformation with PSAG12-IPT gene for leaf senescence retardation, and characterization of SERK genes in miniature potted rose (Rosa hybrid “Linda”). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Copenhagen, DEN.
Zakizadeh, H., T. Debener, S. Sriskandarajah, S. Frello, and M. Serek. 2008. Regeneration of mianiature potted rose (Rosa hybrida L.) via somatic embryogenesis. Europ. J. Hort. Sci. 73:111-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/ejhs.2008/643742
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Adrián Héctor Palacios-Arriaga, Nutan Prasad Rout (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
