Abstract
The objective of this paper is to provide the statistician with a method for the challenging task of deciding whether a given data set might have been invented in a fraudulent way or appearing authentic. This is done not by examining the numbers themselves, but surprisingly, rather by investigating the digital language utilized in writing those numbers! What letters are to words, digits are to numbers. The technique relies on Benford’s Law, a statistical law referring to the consistent and predictable relative proportions of digits occurring in typical real-life data, stating that low digits are much more frequent than high digits. The law is immensely useful as a tool to detect fraud, especially tax fraud, since cheaters inventing fake data mistakenly write them with all digits having about the same proportion due to the erroneous intuition that all digits come with equal chances. By comparing theoretical Benford digit distribution to the actual digit distribution within the accounting data provided by companies, the statistician can easily discover fraud relating to fake and invented data. These digital forensic tests are now standard procedures in most of the Tax Revenue Departments of governments worldwide, as well as in large accounting and auditing companies.
References
Benford Frank (1938), “The law of anomalous numbers,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78 p. 551. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Burton David (1993), “The history of mathematics: an introduction”. Third Edition. (Golden Ratio en páginas 57, 117, 166, 267 y 268). [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Cho Wendy, et al. (2007), “Breaking the (Benford) Law: Statistical Fraud Detection in Campaign Finance”, The American Statistician. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Cleary Richard, Thibodeau Jay (2005), “Applying Digital Analysis Using Benford’s Law to Detect Fraud: The Dangers of Type I Errors”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Durtschi Cindy, et al. (2004), “The Effective Use of Benford’s Law to Assist in Detecting Fraud in Accounting Data”, Journal of Forensic Accounting, Vol. V, pp. 17–34. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Flehinger B.J. (1966), “On the Probability that a Random Integer has Initial Digit A,” American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 73, No. 10, Dec. 1966, pp. 1056–1061. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Hill Theodore (1995), “A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law,” Statistical Science 10(4). [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Hill Theodore (1998), “The First Digit Phenomena,” American Scientist, July–August 1998, v86, n4. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Kossovsky Alex Ely (2006), “Towards a Better Understanding of the Leading Digits Phenomena (Benford’s Law)”, Cornell University Library. http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0612627 [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Lijing Shao, Bo-Qiang Ma (2010), “The Significant Digit Law in Statistical Physics”, Peking University.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.0660v1.pdf [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Miller Steven (2008), “Chains of distributions, hierarchical Bayesian models and Benford’s Law”, June 2008.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.4226 [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Newcomb Simon (1881), “Note on the Frequency of Use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers,” American Journal of Mathematics, 4, pp. 39–40. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Pinkham Roger (1961), “On the Distribution of First Significant Digits,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 1223–1230. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Raimi Ralph A. (1969), “The Peculiar Distribution of First Digit,” Scientific America, Sept. 1969. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Raimi Ralph A. (1976), “The First Digit Problem,” American Mathematical Monthly, Aug–Sep 1976. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Raimi Ralph A. (1985), “The First Digit Phenomena Again,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 129, No. 2, June 1985, pp. 211–219. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Sambridge Malcolm, et al. (2010), “Benford’s Law in the Natural Sciences”, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 37, L22301. [8015-Texto...0-20130301 | PDF]
Sambridge Malcolm, et al. (2011), “Benford’s Law of First Digits: From Mathematical Curiosity to Change Detector,” Asia Pacific Mathematics Newsletter

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright (c) 2012 Alex Ely Kossovsky
