Reflexiones Journal ISSN Impreso: 1021-1209 ISSN electrónico: 1659-2859

OAI: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/reflexiones/oai
Why interaction? A Reconstruction of Erving Goffman´s Early Works
HTML (Español (España))
Audio del resumen en español (Español (España))
PDF (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Consensus
Individual
Social order
Ritual
Social theory
Consenso
Individuo
Orden social
Ritual
Teoría sociológica

How to Cite

Gonnet, J. P. (2019). Why interaction? A Reconstruction of Erving Goffman´s Early Works. Reflexiones Journal, 99(1). https://doi.org/10.15517/rr.v99i1.35308

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to reconstruct the path that led Erving Goffman to the delimitation of interaction as a problematic field to sociology and from this, to the acknowledgement of a social order that would be constitutive to it. In this way, we analyze the essays and articles that are previous to The presentation of self in the everyday life. From our perspective, the theory of interaction presented in this first author´s book appears as a conceptual answer to a set of problems that were defined in previous researches. The goal of this paper is to organize and systematize these preliminary approximations. Throughout this reconstruction it will be noticeable that the exploration of interaction does not constitute an end in itself for the goffmanian project, but it represents a central contribution to a general theory of society and of social order.

https://doi.org/10.15517/rr.v99i1.35308
HTML (Español (España))
Audio del resumen en español (Español (España))
PDF (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Alexander, Jeffrey. 2000. “El interaccionismo simbólico: el individualismo y la obra de Blumer y Goffman”. En Las teorías sociológicas desde la segunda guerra mundial. Análisis multidimensional. Barcelona: Gedisa: 176-193.

Boltanski, Luc. 1973. “Erving Goffman et le temps du soupçon. A propos de la publication en frangais de la Représentation de soi dans la vie quotidienne”. Social Science Information 12 (3): 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847301200307

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1983. “Erving Goffman, discoverer of the infinitely small”. Theory, Culture and Society 2 (1): 112-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276483002001012

Branaman, Ann. 1997. “Goffman social theory”. En The Goffman reader, Lemert y Branaman eds. Massachusetts: Blackwell: 9-41.

Caballero, Juan José. 1998. “La interacción social en Goffman”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 83: 121-149. Recuperado de: http://www.reis.cis.es/REIS/PDF/REIS_083_06.pdf

Cadenas, Hugo. 2012. “La desigualdad de la sociedad. Diferenciación y desigualdad en la sociedad moderna”. Revista Persona y Sociedad XXVI (2): 51-77. Recuperado de: http://personaysociedad.cl/ojs/index.php/pys/article/view/117/76

Collins, Randall. 1980. “Erving Goffman and the development of modern social theory”, en The View from Goffman, Jason Ditton ed. Nueva York: The Macmillan Press: 170-210.

Giddens, Anthony. 1987. “Erving Goffman as a systematic social theorist”. En Social Theory and Modern Sociology, Standford: Stanford University Press: 109-139.

Goffman, Erving. 2004. La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

_1991. “El orden social y la interacción”. En Los momentos y sus hombres, Yves Winkin comp. Barcelona: Paidós: 91-98.

_1983. “The interaction order: American Sociological Association, Presidential address”. American Sociological Review 18 (1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141

­_1967. “On face work. An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction”. En Interaction Ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Londres: Pinguin Books: 5-45.

_1956a. “Embarrassment and social organization”. American Journal of Sociology. 62 (3): 264-271. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2772920?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

_1956b. “The nature of deference and demeanor”. American Anthropologist, (No. 56): 473-502. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1956.58.3.02a00070

_1952. “On cooling the mark out: some aspects of adaptation to failure”. Psychiatry 15 (4): 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1952.11022896

_1951. “Symbols of class status”. The British Journal of Sociology 2 (4): 294-304. https://doi.org/10.2307/588083

Jacobsen, Michael. 2010. The Contemporary Goffman. New York: Routledge.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1987. “The evolutionary differentiation between society and interaction”. En The Micro-Macro Link, Alexander, Giesen, Münch y Smelser eds. Los Angeles: University of California Press: 112-131

Manning, Peter. 2010. “Continuities in Goffman. The interaction order”. En The Contemporary Goffman, Michael Jacobsen ed. New York, Routledge: 98-118.

Parsons, Talcott. 1999. El sistema social. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Psathas, George. 1980. “Early Goffman and the analysis of face-to-face interaction in Strategic interaction” en The View from Goffman, Jason Ditton ed. Nueva York: The Macmillan Press: 24-51.

Rawls, Anne. 1987. “The interaction order sui generis: Goffman´s contribution to social theory”. Sociological Theory 5: 136-149. https://doi.org/10.2307/201935

Smith, Greg. 2006. Erving Goffman. New York: Routledge.

Treviño, Javier. 2003. “Introduction: Erving Goffman and the Interaction Order”. En Goffman´s Legacy, Javier Treviño ed. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.

Winkin, Yves. 1991. “Erving Goffman: retrato del sociólogo joven”. En Los momentos y sus hombres, Yves Winkin ed. Barcelona: Paidós: 13-85.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.