An Analysis of Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection from Leibniz’s Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/revfil.2025.64170Keywords:
Leibniz, Darwin, Philosophical quality, Biological evolution, Natural selectionAbstract
Charles Darwin published seven editions of The Origin of Species during his lifetime. Starting from the premise that said book is philosophical, Chapter IV of the work was analyzed here to find the elements underlying the explanation of natural selection throughout the seven editions. Using the criteria established by Leibniz in his Dissertation on the Philosophical Style of Nizolio, it was determined that the philosophical quality in the first edition is intermediate and increased in the following editions, mainly in the third compared to the second.
Downloads
References
Beatty, John. 2008. «Chance variation and evolutionary contingency: Darwin, Simpson, The Simpsons, and Gould». In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Michael Ruse, 189-210. New York: Oxford University Press.
Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (First Edition). London: John Murray. http://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1859_Origin_F373.pdf
Darwin, Charles. 1860. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (Second Edition). London: John Murray. http://darwinonline.org.uk/converted/pdf/1860_Origin_F376.pdf
Darwin, Charles. (1861): On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (Third Edition). London: John Murray. http://darwinonline.org.uk/converted/pdf/1861_Origin_F381.pdf
Darwin, Charles. 1866. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (Fourth Edition). London: John Murray. darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1866_Origin_F385.pdf
Darwin, Charles. 1869. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (Fifth Edition). London: John Murray. Available at: http://darwinonline.org.uk/converted/pdf/1869_Origin_F387.pdf
Darwin, Charles. 1872. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (Sixth Edition). London: John Murray. http://darwinonline.org.uk/converted/pdf/1872_Origin_F391.pdf
Darwin, Charles. 1876. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (Sixth Edition, with additions and corrections). London: John Murray. http://darwinonline.org.uk/converted/pdf/1876_Origin_F401.pdf
Darwin, Francis, ed. 1898. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Descartes, René. 2006. Discurso del Método. Meditaciones Metafísicas. Traslated by Luis Rutiaga. México: Tomo.
Eco, Umberto. 1992. Los límites de la interpretación. Traslated by Helena Lozano. Barcelona: Lumen.
Haufe, Chris. 2012. «Darwin’s laws». Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences 43, n° 1: 26980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.011
Kant, Immanuel. 2006. Crítica de la razón pura. Traslated by Pedro Ribas. México: Taurus.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1993. Disertación sobre el estilo filosófico de Nizolio. Traslated by Luis Frayle. Madrid: Tecnos.
Popper, Karl. 1985. El darwinismo como programa metafísico. In Búsqueda sin término, Karl Popper. Traslated by Carmen García, 287-288. Madrid: Tecnos.
Ruse, Michael. 2009. Defining Darwin: essays on the history and philosophy of evolutionary biology. New York: Prometeus.
Wagner, Andreas. 2012. «The Role of Randomness in Darwinian Evolution». Philosophy of Science 79, n.° 1: 95–119.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND PUBLICATION AUTHORIZATION[1]
By this means, the author presents to the Editorial Committee of the Philosophy Magazine of the University of Costa Rica (RF-UCR) the article of his own authorship, which he presents for its evaluation and publication in said Magazine.
THE AUTHOR DECLARES UNDER FAITH OF OATH that:
The article is ORIGINAL and UNPUBLISHED: that is, it constitutes an intellectual production of the person indicated in it and has not been published in another print or digital journal, nor is it simultaneously postulated for publication in another print, electronic, or online journal. any other written media or editorial body.
While the article is in the editorial process of the RF-UCR, it will not be submitted to any other journal, until it has been duly rejected or withdrawn by the RF-UCR.
The author has not signed contracts for the transfer of economic rights or licenses to use with third parties in relation to the intellectual property rights that he holds over the postulated article that prevents its publication by means of the license described in point 5.d. of this document. In case of not being the owner of the economic rights, he has the authorization of the owner of the right to publish it under said license.
If the article was prepared collaboratively (either in the case of works in which the authors have the same degree of participation or those in which there is a main author and one or more secondary authors), that all( as) they have contributed intellectually to the preparation of the document.
In the event that the article is accepted for publication, the author accepts that the article be published by the RF-UCR under the following conditions:
a) The publication and full reproduction of the work or part of it, both by print and electronic media, including the Internet and any other known or unknown technology.
b) The adaptation of the work to formats for reading, sound, voice and any other representation or technical mechanism available, which makes it possible for people who are partially or totally blind, or with some other form of special abilities that prevent them from accessing it. the conventional reading of the article.
c) The distribution and access of the work to the public so that they can access it from the time and place that each person chooses, through physical or electronic mechanisms.
d) That the work be distributed through the Creative Commons, Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Costa Rica license, which implies the possibility that readers can freely download, store, copy and distribute the final approved version and published (post print) of the article, as long as it is done without commercial purposes, derivative works are not generated and the source and authorship of the work is mentioned. The full text of the license can be consulted on the website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/cr/legalcode
The author accepts that the editing team of the RF-UCR adjust the article to the "Instructions to authors" previously established and published on the official website of the Journal (https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/ index.php/philosophy/index); regarding procedures, format, correction, editing, translation, publication, duration of the editorial process and other requirements requested in said regulations.
The author accepts that the application and possible publication of the article in the RF-UCR will be governed by its editorial policies, the institutional regulations of the University of Costa Rica and the legislation of the Republic of Costa Rica.
The author declares that from the research that originates this article:
a) No other articles have been derived
b) I am considering submitting other articles for publication
c) There are other articles that are postulated in:
[1] This document is based on the letter of originality and assignment of rights of the Journal of Economic Sciences of the University of Costa Rica