Revista Médica UCR
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Revista Médica de la Universidad de Costa Rica

Current Issue

Volume 20, No. 2Segundo número año 2026

Published July 6, 2026

Articles

  1. MEDICATION RECONCILIATION AND PHARMACOTHERAPY SAFETY IN ONCOLOGY PATIENTS

    Introduction: The prevalence of chronic diseases has increased significantly, leading to a growing population of pluripathological and polymedicated patients, particularly in oncology. These patients are highly susceptible to drug interactions, medication errors, and adverse events. Therefore, medication reconciliation is recognized as an essential strategy to ensure therapeutic safety. This process allows us to identify drug interactions and describe the main adverse events in oncology.

    Methodology:
    An observational and retrospective study was conducted based on the review of medication reconciliation protocols of oncology patients treated between January and May 2025. Patients aged 18 years and older were included. Data collected included age, sex, cancer diagnosis, comorbidities, medications used and identified drug interactions.

    Results:
    A total of 131 patients were analyzed, most of them female (69.5%), with a mean age of 48 years. The most frequent neoplasms were breast cancer (38.2%) and prostate cancer (12.9%). The average number of drugs per patient was six. Seventy-one drug interactions were identified (mean: two per patient), of which 68.1% were classified as severe. The most common interactions involved aprepitant–dexamethasone, ondansetron–chlorpheniramine, and dexamethasone–paclitaxel. The most frequently reported adverse events were nausea and vomiting (36.6%), vitamin D deficiency (28.2%), and gastritis/reflux (25.2%).

    Conclusions:
    The high frequency of drug interactions and adverse events observed highlights the need for a systematic medication reconciliation protocol in oncology patients. This practice supports the early detection of therapeutic discrepancies, prevents potentially serious adverse events, and enhances the safety and effectiveness of oncologic treatment.

Clinical Case

  1. BLADDER PERFORATION AS A SEVERE COMPLICATION OF ABDOMINOPLASTY WITH LIPOSUCTION: A CASE REPORT

    ABSTRACT

    Abdominoplasty combined with liposuction is a widely performed procedure in aesthetic plastic surgery and is generally considered safe when anatomical and technical principles are respected. However, rare but severe complications have been described, including visceral perforation, mainly associated with technical errors, inadequate control of surgical planes, and delayed postoperative recognition. We present the case of a patient who underwent abdominoplasty with liposuction and lipotransfer and subsequently developed a bladder laceration with hemoperitoneum, showing an insidious clinical course and progressive postoperative deterioration, ultimately leading to severe anemia, organ failure, and even cardiorespiratory arrest. Although the patient presented moderate risk factors, these did not justify the occurrence of a bladder injury in the context of an adequate technique, suggesting a poorly directed deep liposuction or blind dissection in the suprapubic region. The literature indicates that bladder perforation is an exceptional complication in this type of procedure and that its main impact on morbidity and mortality is related more to delayed diagnosis than to the initial injury itself. Intraoperative ultrasonography has been proposed as an effective tool to improve procedural safety by allowing precise identification of the surgical plane and prevention of injuries to deep structures. This case highlights the importance of appropriate patient selection, meticulous surgical technique, implementation of safety measures, and strict postoperative surveillance for the early detection of potentially lethal complications.

    Keywords: Abdominoplasty; Liposuction; Urinary Bladder Injuries; Postoperative Complications; Case Reports. Source: MeSH