Beyond the Spectre: The Socialist Project Under Weber’s Skeptical Gaze

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/f0cs5z93

Keywords:

Socialism – Capitalism – Bureaucracy – Marxism – Rationalization

Abstract

Several important authors argue that Max Weber’s work can be understood, fundamentally, as an ongoing polemical dialogue with Marxism. This critical relationship encompasses both the theoretical dimension of historical materialism and socialism as a political ideology. This documentary research focuses on this second aspect to trace and analyze Weber’s expectations regarding a society with a socialist government and economy. The aim is to examine the author’s critical stance toward socialist ideas in general and German social democracy in particular, through
the analysis of his Political Writings and his magnum opus, Economy and Society. Contrary to interpretations that minimize his political assessments, this paper argues that Weber had a deep interest in politics and that his liberal-bourgeois position permeates his understanding of capitalist society. The divergence in political stance between Marx and Weber constitutes, from our perspective, the decisive factor in understanding their theoretical discrepancies —whether philosophical, sociological, economic, or historical. Among the conclusions, it is noted that a rigorous analysis of the dimensions structuring the Weberian reading of Marx and Engels reveals that Weber did not intend a theoretical assimilation or integration, but rather to articulate a qualitatively different theoretical counter-offensive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Celia Duek, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.

    Argentina. PhD in Political and Social Sciences. Master's in Political Science and Sociology. Bachelor's degree in Sociology. Full Professor at the Faculty of Political and Social Sciences of the National University of Cuyo, Argentina. Some of her recent publications include: What Working Class Today? Theoretical Debates and Conceptual Dilemmas (2023) and From the Working Class to the Multitude: A Critical Assessment of Hardt and Negri's Proposal (2020). Her areas of interest are sociological theory, social structure, and contemporary critical thought.

  • Graciela Inda, Comisión Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.

    Argentina. PhD in Political and Social Sciences. Master's in Political Science and Sociology. Full Professor at the National University of Cuyo, Argentina. Independent Researcher at CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council). Her recent publications include: Political Practice and the State at the Limits of Marxism: The Poulantzas/Althusser Debate (1976-1979) (2024), What Working Class Today? Theoretical Debates and Conceptual Dilemmas (2023), and The State and Its Bureaucracies: Theoretical Discussions and Research Advances (2023). Her areas of interest are: sociological theory/State/political subjects.

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

Beyond the Spectre: The Socialist Project Under Weber’s Skeptical Gaze. (2026). Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 192, 133-151. https://doi.org/10.15517/f0cs5z93