New maize cultivars with agronomic potential for the humid-tropics.

Authors

  • Mariano Mendoza UAAAN. Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
  • Arnoldo Oyervides UAAAN. Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
  • Alfonso López UAAAN. Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v11i1.17355

Abstract

It was studied the performance of each of group of lines based on their combining ability to determine the best hybrids. We also estimated usefull heterosis in the traits under study. 23 lines were crossed with two testers and evaluated in 1995 in a experiment with two replications in two locations in Veracruz, Mexico. A complete block design with factorial arrangement was utilized. Lines were consideredas factor A while testers were considered as factor B.  Results indicated that the average performance of lines, testers and lines x testers turned out to be statistically different for flowering date, plant height, prolificy and yield. Lines 37 and 7 standout with 9.473 and 9.203 t/ha, respectively. Outstanding hybrids showed yields between 9.173 to 9.685 t/ha and included lines 7, 15, 17, 37, 39 and 49. The highest heterosis and best specific combining ability (SCA) were found out in the cross between line 17 x tester 1 with 18,34 % for yield and line 37 was best for general combining ability (GCA) (0,52). Heterosis for flowering date was of -7,27 % and outstanding for their ACG the lines 14, 15, and 39. For prolificy the  31 was best than any other line with 52 % of heterosis and ACG too and for ACE the cross of the 17 x tester 1 was superior (6,28).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CASTAÑÓN, G.; JEFFERS D.; HIDALGO H.; TOSQUY O. H.; ARANO R.; RAYGOZA B. 1997. Line x Tester analysis for drought tolerance in tropical maize In: Book of Abstracts. The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. An international symposium. Mexico, D. F., Mexico. pp. 46-47.

CEDILLO, G. V. 1985. Comportamiento de 26 líneas de maíz derivadas de V-524 en un estudio de aptitud combinatoria con tres tipos de probadores. Tesis Lic. UAAAN. Saltillo, Coahuila, México. 73 p.

CHÁVEZ A, J .L. 1995. Mejoramiento de Plantas II. 2a. ed. Editorial Trillas. México, D. F:

DUVICK, D. N. 1992. Genetic contributions to advances in yield of U. S. maize. Maydica 37:69-79.

HALLAUER, A. R.; J. B. MIRANDA. 1988. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa Sate University. Press/Ames. pp. 159-294.

JENKINS, M. T. 1935. The effect of inbreeding and selection within inbred lines of maize upon the hybrids made after successive generations of selfing. Iowa State J. Sci. 3:429-450.

LÓPEZ, P. E. 1986. Comparación entre diferentes probadores para evaluar líneas de maíz. Folleto de Divulgación. Vol. 1, No. 7. UAAAN. Saltillo, Coahuila, México. pp. 2-5.

MIRANDA F. J. B. 1997. Inbreeding and heterosis. In: Book of Abstracts. The genetics and explotation of heterosis in crops. An international symposium. Mexico, D. F., Mexico. pp. 12-13.

OYERVIDES, G. A. 1986. Estudio de la importancia económica de tres caracteres morfológicos del maíz. Tesis

de Maestría. Colegio de Postgraduados. Chapingo, México. 151 p.

ROMERO, C. M. G. 1996. Evaluación de líneas tropicales de maíz en forma perse y en cruza con dos probadores para determinar su aptitud combinatoria. Tesis Profesional. UAAAN. Saltillo, Coahuila, México. 74 p.

SINGH, R. K.; B. D. CHAUDHARY. 1977. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers. Revised Edition. 1979. Printed in India. pp. 191-200.

SPRAGUE, G. F.; L. A. TATUM. 1942. General versus specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34:923-932.

VASAL, S. K.; H. CÓRDOBA. 1996. Heterosis en maíz: Acelerando la tecnología de híbridos de dos progenitores para el mundo en desarrollo. Memoria del Curso Internacional de Actualización en Fitomejoramiento y Agricultura Sustentable. 1a. Edición. UAAAN. Buenavista, Saltillo, México. pp. 32-55.

How to Cite

Mendoza, M., Oyervides, A., & López, A. (2006). New maize cultivars with agronomic potential for the humid-tropics. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 11(1), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v11i1.17355

Most read articles by the same author(s)