Políticas públicas de coproducción y cooperativas en el MERCOSUR

Sánchez-Bajo, Claudia

doi:10.15517/x8ayqf54

Authors

Claudia Sánchez-Bajo Centro de Estudios de Sociología del Trabajo (CESOT), Facultad de Ciencias Economicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9246-2549

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/x8ayqf54

Keywords:

Regionalism, multilevel governance, knowledge construction, food security, COVID-19 , polycentricity, co-creation

Abstract

This study examines regionalism within MERCOSUR in light of recent theories on policymaking, focusing on two lower-level institutional bodies: the Specialised Meeting on Cooperatives (RECM, 2001) and the Specialised Meeting on Family Farming (REAF, 2004). These theories include Ostrom's polycentricity and co-production, Tremblay's co-creation and co-construction, and Pesqueux's theories of organisational knowledge. While literature on MERCOSUR has generally focused on trade and the relationship between Argentina and Brazil, literature on co-creation and co-production has primarily developed within national contexts. Only a few studies have concentrated on one organisation at the regional level. The main question is as follows: how can bodies such as the RECM and the REAF be understood within the MERCOSUR framework in light of public policy theory? The approach used is mixed, combining institutionalist and constructivist perspectives. This comparative case study involves process tracking and documentary analysis, complemented by the author’s conversations with members of the RECM between 2003 and 2008. From an analytical perspective, the RECM and the REAF function as mechanisms of dynamic co-construction, operating as structural components of MERCOSUR regionalism. This is underpinned by a polycentric architecture with an epistemic foundation, and a meso level acts as an institutional pivot. The substantive focus is on the 2015 MERCOSUR Cooperative Statute (ratified by Uruguay and Brazil), GMC Recommendation 02/2018, the 2017 RECM-REAF Agreement (linked to the SDGs), and pandemic-related initiatives concerning supply, donations, loans, virtual training, and the agreement with ECLAC. Constraints include gaps between co-creation and national implementation, as well as issues relating to funding sources. This article contributes to the study of regionalism by offering a scalar extension of public policy theories and recognising the ontology of shared values as an institutional resource. It also emphasises the importance of the epistemic function as a constitutive element in the co-creation of public policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Claudia Sánchez-Bajo, Centro de Estudios de Sociología del Trabajo (CESOT), Facultad de Ciencias Economicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Dr. Sánchez-Bajo holds a degree in Political Science from the Universidad del Salvador in Buenos Aires and a PhD in Development Studies from the ISS, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Her doctoral thesis focused on MERCOSUR. She held the inaugural Chair of Cooperative Enterprises at the University of Winnipeg, where she created the specialization in cooperative enterprises. She has taught at, among other institutions, the University of Kassel, the University of Texas at Austin, and the University Institute of Higher Studies at the University of Pavia.

References

Aligică, P. D., & Tarko, V. (2013). Co-production, polycentricity, and value heterogeneity: The Ostroms' public choice institutionalism revisited. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 726–741. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000427

Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public governance as co-creation: A strategy for revitalizing the public sector and rejuvenating democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E, & Torfing, J. (2022). Co-creation for sustainability: The UN SDGs and the power of local partnerships. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781800437982

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2024). The democratic quality of co-creation: A theoretical exploration. Public Policy and Administration, 39(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231170715

Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.

Bajo, C. [Sánchez-Bajo, C.] (1992). Argentine-Brazilian integration in historical perspective [Tesis de maestría, Erasmus University Rotterdam] ISS Working Paper Series, General Series, 131. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/18829

Baldwin, E., Thiel, A., McGinnis, M., & Kellner, E. (2024). Empirical research on polycentric governance: Critical gaps and a framework for studying long-term change. Policy Studies Journal, 52(2), 319–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12518

Barceló, N. (2023). Flexibilización, ¿para qué? Apuntes sobre la política exterior uruguaya hacia el MERCOSUR (2015-2022). Desafíos, 35(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.12034

Barreto, V., & Wollrad, D. (2025, enero). MERCOSUR-Unión Europea: ¿al final hay acuerdo? Nueva Sociedad. Democracia y política en América Latina. https://nuso.org/articulo/mercosur-union-europea-acuerdo-comercial/

Basso, D., Zimmermann, S. A., & Britez Cohene, D. J. (2020). El cooperativismo en la Reunión Especializada de Agricultura Familiar del MERCOSUR (REAF MERCOSUR): Decisiones y reflexiones. Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento, 9(5), 730–756. https://doi.org/10.3895/rbpd.v9n5.13514

Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arregle, J-L., Webb, J. W., Miller, T. L. (2012). Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs' social networks, and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1024–1049. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0095

Behnke, N. (2024). Coping with turbulence and safeguarding against authoritarianism: Polycentric governance as a resilience resource. Politics and Governance, 12, 8596. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8596

Benítez Galeano, V. B. (2024). Arancel externo común: análisis sobre la disminución en los aranceles de importación dentro del MERCOSUR y los efectos en la economía nacional 2022-2023. Revista Científica UPAP, 4(2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.54360/rcupap.v4i2.179

Bohrt, D. (2026, febrero). Bolivia en el MERCOSUR: membresía plena, integración pendiente [Análisis]. PPO Indacochea. https://www.ppolegal.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Analisis-Bolivia-en-el-MERCOSUR-membresia-plena-integracion-pendiente-Diego-Bohrt.pdf

Bonnici, F., & Klijn, V. (2023). Ch. 2. Public policies to advance the social economy. In Krlev, G., Wruk, D., Pasi, G., & Bernhard, M. (Eds.), Social Economy Science: Transforming the Economy and Making Society More Resilient (pp. 16–36). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192868343.003.0002

Bourgon, J. (2011). A new synthesis of public administration: Serving in the 21st century. School of Policy Studies & McGill-Queen's University Press.

Bourgon, J. (2017). The new synthesis of public administration. Fieldbook. Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.

Bouzas, R., Da Motta Veiga, P., & Torrent, R. (2002). In-depth analysis of MERCOSUR integration, its prospectives and the effects thereof on the market access of EU goods, services and investment [Informe]. Observatory of Globalisation, Universitat de Barcelona.

Bustos, E. (2026, 27 de marzo). MERCOSUR: 35 años de integración, entre logros, tensiones y desafíos del futuro. Noticias Agropecuarias. https://www.noticiasagropecuarias.com/2026/03/27/MERCOSUR-35-anos-de-integracion-entre-logros-tensiones-y-desafios-del-futuro/

Camilo, C., & Marinho, M. L. (2022). Dos años de pandemia de COVID-19 en América Latina y el Caribe: Reflexiones para avanzar hacia sistemas de salud y protección social universales, integrales, sostenibles y resilientes. CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/47914-anos-pandemia-covid-19-america-latina-caribe-reflexiones-avanzar-sistemas-salud

Cole, D. H., & McGinnis, M. D. (Eds.). (2014). Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of political economy: Polycentricity in public administration and political science. Lexington Books.

Collins, H. M. (1993). The Structure of Knowledge. Social Research. 60(1), 95–116. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970729

Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2021). Estudio económico de América Latina y el Caribe. Dinámica laboral y políticas de empleo para una recuperación sostenible e inclusiva más allá de la crisis COVID-19. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/47192

Confederación de Organizaciones de Productores Familiares del MERCOSUR Ampliado. (2021, 21 de mayo). REAF MERCOSUR: un espacio estratégico para articular políticas públicas e impulsar el Decenio de la Agricultura Familiar en nuestra región. COPROFAM. https://coprofam.org/2021/05/21/reaf-MERCOSUR-un-espacio-estrategico-para-articular-politicas-publicas-e-impulsar-el-decenio-de-la-agricultura-familiar-en-nuestra-region/

Consejo del Mercado Común. (2015, 20 de diciembre). Resolución MERCOSUR/CMC/DEC. N° 54/15. Disposiciones relativas a las “Cooperativas del MERCOSUR”. XLIX CMC – Asunción, 20/XII/15. https://normas.MERCOSUR.int/public/normativas/3245

Council of the European Union. (2026, January 9). EU-MERCOSUR: Council greenlights signature of the comprehensive partnership and trade agreement. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2026/01/09/eu-MERCOSUR-council-greenlights-signature-of-the-comprehensive-partnership-and-trade-agreement/

Delegation of the European Union to Uruguay. (2024, 11 de diciembre). Joint Statement by the State Parties of MERCOSUR and the European Commission on the conclusion of the negotiations of the Partnership Agreement. European Union Websites. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/uruguay/joint-statement-state-parties-MERCOSUR-and-european-commission-conclusion-negotiations-partnership_en

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019924264X.001.0001

Fontenla, E. H. (2021, 22 de marzo). MERCOSUR cooperativo: Treinta años de patrimonio común. Economía Solidaria. https://www.economiasolidaria.com.ar/MERCOSUR-cooperativo-treinta-anos-de-patrimonio-comun-2/

Giordano, P., Campos, R., & Michalczewsky, K. (2020). The COVID-19 shock: Building trade resilience for after the pandemic. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://doi.org/10.18235/0002844

González, L. (2020). Participación de jóvenes en las organizaciones de la agricultura familiar del MERCOSUR. Reflexiones a partir del caso de la REAF (2007-2018). Millcayac, Revista Digital de Ciencias Sociales, VII(13), 199–215. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10876

González, L., & Lagar, F. J. (2014). Las Reuniones Especializadas de Cooperativas y Agricultura Familiar en el contexto del proceso de cambio del MERCOSUR (2001-2013). FLACSO-ISA. https://bicyt.conicet.gov.ar/fichas/produccion/9721187

Grupo Mercado Común. (2001). Reunión Especializada de Cooperativas del MERCOSUR (Resolución MERCOSUR/GMC/RES. Nº 35/01). XLIII GMC - Montevideo, 10/X/01. https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/70000-74999/70063/norma.htm

Grupo Mercado Común. (2004). Reunión Especializada de Agricultura Familiar del MERCOSUR ((Resolución MERCOSUR/GMC/RES. Nº 11/04). LIV GMC – Buenos Aires, 25/VI/04. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/804

Guimarães Ferreira, G. A. (2019). A Reunião Especializada sobre Agricultura Familiar do Mercosul (REAF): expansão ou aprofundamento da integração regional? Conjuntura Austral, 10(49), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.88352

Haas, E. B. (2004). Introduction: Institutionalism or constructivism? In The uniting of Europe: Politics, social and economic forces, 1950–1957 (3rd ed., pp. XIII–LVI). University of Notre Dame Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19m62zk.4

Haas, E. B. (2017 [2001]). Does Constructivism Subsume Neofunctionalism? In M. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni (Ed.), Debates on European Integration: A Reader (pp. 437–446). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20933-6_19

Hagemejer, J., Maurer, A., Rudloff, B., Stoll, P-T, Woolcock, S., Costa Vieira, A., Mensah, K., & Sid ło, K. (2021). Trade aspects of the EU-MERCOSUR Association Agreement (PE 653.650). Policy Department for External Relations, European Parliament. https://doi.org/10.2861/370417

Hagemejer, J., Stoll, P-T, Rudloff, B., & Mensah, K. (2025). An update on the economic, sustainability and regulatory effects of the trade part of the EU-MERCOSUR Partnership Agreement. Policy Department for External Relations, European Parliament. https://doi.org/10.2861/5802803

Heymann, D., & Navajas, F. (2000). Coordinación de políticas macroeconómicas en el MERCOSUR: algunas reflexiones. En J. Carrera & F. Sturzenegger (Eds.), Coordinación de políticas macroeconómicas en el MERCOSUR. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura. (2021, 17 de marzo). Seminario Internacional: Sistemas agroalimentarios sostenibles. MERCOSUR. https://www.ismercosur.org/es/s-agroalimentar/

Instituto Nacional de Cooperativismo del Paraguay. (2024, 21 de junio). LXVII Sesión Plenaria de la Reunión Especializada de Cooperativas del MERCOSUR — RECM. INCOOP. https://www.incoop.gov.py/?p=13058

International Labour Organization. (2022). Resolution concerning decent work and the social and solidarity economy (110th Session of the International Labour Conference). https://www.ilo.org/resource/record-decisions/ilc/110/resolution-concerning-decent-work-and-social-and-solidarity-economy

Kidd, N. (2025, 3 de julio). Lula toma las riendas del MERCOSUR, clave en su apuesta por el multilateralismo. Swissinfo.ch. https://www.swissinfo.ch/spa/lula-toma-las-riendas-del-MERCOSUR,-clave-en-su-apuesta-por-el-multilateralismo/89628361

Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments — From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x

Lofthouse, J. K. & Herzberg, R. Q. (2023). The continuing case for a polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Sustainability, 15(4), 3770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043770

López, A. J. (2022). MERCOSUR: el dilema de la agenda comercial externa. Revista Aportes para la Integración Latinoamericana, XXVIII(47), e043. https://doi.org/10.24215/24689912e043

López, M. N., & Giménez, C. (2018). Cooperación intra-MERCOSUR (2005-2015): Análisis de siete sectores. Secretaría del MERCOSUR, Unidad Técnica de Cooperación Internacional. https://www.mercosur.int/documento/estudio-la-cooperacion-intra-mercosur-2005-2015-analisis-de-siete-sectores

Malamud, A. (2005). Presidential diplomacy and the institutional underpinnings of MERCOSUR: An empirical examination. Latin American Research Review, 40(1), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2005.0004

Malamud, A. (2020). MERCOSUR and the European Union: Comparative regionalism and interregionalism. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1085

Martínez, R. (Ed.). (2019). Institucionalidad social en América Latina y el Caribe. Serie Desarrollo Social. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/42061

MERCOSUR. (2017, 25 de marzo). Reunión REAF y RECM: Jornada de Intercambio: Innovación, Agricultura Familiar y Cooperativismo. MERCOSUR. https://www.MERCOSUR.int/reunion-reaf-y-recm/

MERCOSUR. (2018, 13 de marzo). Acta de la reunión conjunta RECM-REAF. Reunión Especializada de Cooperativas del MERCOSUR y Reunión Especializada de Agricultura Familiar.

MERCOSUR. (2020, 28 de diciembre). Cuarto volumen de la Revista MERCOSUR de Políticas Sociales: Fronteras y Políticas de Salud, una aproximación en tiempos de pandemia. MERCOSUR. https://www.MERCOSUR.int/cuarto-volumen-de-la-revista-MERCOSUR-de-politicas-sociales/

MERCOSUR. (2024, 8 de julio). Bolivia depositó el instrumento de ratificación del protocolo de adhesión al MERCOSUR. https://www.MERCOSUR.int/bolivia-deposito-el-instrumento-de-ratificacion-del-protocolo-de-adhesion-al-MERCOSUR/

Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. (2024, 5 de julio). Bolivia oficializa su adhesión al MERCOSUR. https://cancilleria.gob.bo/mre/2024/07/05/16383/

Niederle, P. A. (2016) REAF MERCOSUR: Una década de coproducción de políticas públicas entre el Estado y la Sociedad Civil. En Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura, REAF (Reunión Especializada en Agricultura Familiar) MERCOSUR: Una década de coproducción de políticas públicas entre el Estado y la sociedad civil (pp. 1–15). https://www.fao.org/3/a-i5749s.pdf

Niederle, P. A. (2017). A institucionalização da agricultura familiar no Mercosul: da definição normativa aos sistemas nacionais de registro. Novos Cadernos NAEA, 20(2), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.5801/ncn.v20i1.3505

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. (2020, 15 de abril). Les répercussions de la COVID-19 sur l'accès des petits producteurs aux marchés. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8657fr

Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022

Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Ostrom, E. (2009). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems (Nobel Prize in Economics Documents, No. 20094). Nobel Prize Committee. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/ostrom_lecture.pdf

Peixoto Batista, J. P., & Perrotta, D. (2017). El MERCOSUR en el nuevo escenario político regional: más allá de la coyuntura. Desafíos, 30(1), 219–262. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.5767

Pesqueux, Y. (2020). Knowledge management revisited. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5(4), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.01.002

Pesqueux, Y., & Durance, P. (2004). Apprentissage organisationnel, économie de la connaissance: Mode ou modèle? (Cahier du LIPSOR – Série Recherche, No. 66). Hal Open Science. https://hal.science/hal-00509672v1

Pinto Santa Cruz, A. (1973). Heterogeneidad estructural y modelos de desarrollo reciente de la América Latina. En Inflación: Raíces estructurales. Fondo de Cultura Económica. http://hdl.handle.net/11362/35058

Rodríguez Díaz, J. D., Barceló, N., Carrau, N., & Bittencourt, G. (2022). El futuro del MERCOSUR: una mirada interdisciplinaria desde Uruguay. Serie: Orden global y regional. Diciembre. Fundación Friedrich Ebert Stiftung en el Uruguay. https://collections.fes.de/publikationen/content/titleinfo/461376

Rosamond, B. (2005). The uniting of Europe and the foundation of EU studies: Revisiting the neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500043928

Rüland, J. (2014). Interregionalism and International Relations: Reanimating an Obsolescent Research Agenda?. In: Baert, F., Scaramagli, T., Söderbaum, F. (eds) Intersecting Interregionalism (pp. 15-35). United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7566-4_2

Rüland, J., Hänggi, H., & Roloff , R. (Eds.) (2006). Interregionalism and International Relations A Stepping Stone to Global Governance?. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Interregionalism-and-International-Relations-A-Stepping-Stone-to-Global-Governance/Ruland-Hanggi-Roloff/p/book/9780415479721

Russo, S. (2021). Los 30 años del MERCOSUR. Contexto complejo y futuro incierto. Análisis de Coyuntura del CeRPI. 24 (mayo), 1-11. . http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/138451

Sabourin, E., & Grisa, C. (Eds.). (2018). A difusão de políticas brasileiras para a agricultura familiar na América Latina e Caribe. Escritos Editora. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/588681/7/ID588681.pdf

Salvador, M. L., Pérez Sanz, F. J., & Gargallo Castel, A. (2018). Áreas rurales y cooperativas: iniciativas de mujeres para el desarrollo. REVESCO Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 127, 116–138. https://doi.org/10.5209/REVE.58397

Sanahuja, J. A. (2026). La Unión Europea y América Latina en tiempos de «vasallización». Nueva Sociedad, 321 (enero-febrero), 77–93. https://nuso.org/articulo/321-union-europea-america-latina-tiempos-vasallizacion/

Sanahuja, J. A. y Rodríguez, J. D. (2024). Unión Europea y MERCOSUR: cuatro nudos ¿y un desenlace? Nueva Sociedad, 311 (mayo-junio), 17–26. https://nuso.org/articulo/311-UE-y-mercosur-cuatro-nudos-un-desenlace/

Sanahuja, J. A., & Rodríguez, J. D. (2019). Veinte años de Unión Europea-MERCOSUR: Del interregionalismo a la crisis de la globalización (Documento de Trabajo, No. 13/2019). Fundación Carolina. https://www.fundacioncarolina.es/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/DT_FC_13.pdf

Sánchez-Bajo, C. (1999). The European Union and MERCOSUR: A case of interregionalism. Third World Quarterly, 20(5), 927–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599913415

Sánchez-Bajo, C. (2001) The Political Economy of Regionalism: Business Actors in Mercosur in the Petrochemical and Steel Industrial Sectors. [Tesis doctoral, Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University in Rotterdam]. Shaker Publishing B.V. https://www.shaker.de/de/site/content/shop/index.asp?ID=8&ISBN=978-90-423-0152-8

Scognamiglio, F., Sancino, A., Caló, F., Jacklin-Jarvis, C., & Rees, J. (2023). The public sector and co-creation in turbulent times: A systematic literature review on robust governance in the COVID-19 emergency. Public Administration, 101(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12875

Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M., & Howlett, M. (2018). Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool. Policy and Society, 37(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676

Tremblay, S., Sasseville, N., Leyrie, C., Bousquet, J., Boivin, M., Bizot, D., & Guédé Médétonwan, O. (2019). Vers une synthèse des écrits portant sur le concept de coconstruction: Regard croisé entre la gestion de projet et le travail social. Revue de Management et de Stratégie. https://www.revue-rms.fr/attachment/1822000/

Ubelhartt, I. (2025, 25 de diciembre). Entre la confrontación y el pragmatismo, así fue la política regional de Argentina en 2025 bajo el gobierno de Javier Milei. Escenario Mundial. https://www.escenariomundial.com/2025/12/25/entre-la-confrontacion-y-el-pragmatismo-asi-fue-la-politica-regional-de-argentina-en-2025-bajo-el-gobierno-de-javier-milei/

Uwizeyimana, D. E., & Maphunye, K. J. (2014). The changing global public administration and its theoretical and practical implications for Africa. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 6(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPAPR2014.0284

Vaillancourt, Y. (2019). De la co-construction des connaissances et des politiques publiques.Sociologies Dossier. https://doi.org/10.4000/sociologies.11589

Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Free Press.

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 3). Bedminster Press.

Wiener, A., Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2018). European integration theory (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Wilson, A., Hoyt, A., Roelants, B., & Kumar, K. (2021, 1–3 December). Examining our cooperative identity [Discussion Paper]. International Coopertative Alliance. https://ica.coop/en/media/library/discussion-paper-33rd-world-cooperative-congress

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Zelicovich, J. (2020). ¿Lo que no te mata te fortalece? El MERCOSUR en tiempos de pandemia. Temas y debates, 40(1), 419–427. https://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1853-984X2020000300042

Zelicovich, J. (2024a, julio). La resiliencia del MERCOSUR. Un balance de la Cumbre de Asunción. Nueva Sociedad (Edición digital). https://nuso.org/articulo/la-resiliencia-del-MERCOSUR/

Zelicovich, J. (2024b, noviembre-diciembre). Una política exterior para la «jungla». Argentina en el contexto internacional. Nueva Sociedad, (308). https://www.nuso.org/articulo/308-argentina-en-el-contexto-internacional/