Abstract
Introduction
Structuralism is one of the main currents of thought of the 20th century. Its developments concern to the most diverse aspects of both the social sciences and philosophy.
Objective
The objective of this article is to carry out a reconstruction of the structuralist social theory, seeking to reveal the problematic value of which it still carries. Specifically, we will try to show the way in which a series of traditional epistemological antinomies, typical of the human sciences, are unsettled. In particular, the oppositions between individualism and holism, materialism and idealism, substantialism and relationalism will be discussed.
Method and technique
For this, our method will be to concentrate on describing the basic theoretical syntax that structuralist research articulates around the concepts of relation and system.
Results
At least two results were obtained 1) it has been possible to clarify the characteristic way in which structuralism addresses and understands identities and social systems, 2) it is pointed out that the affirmation of the relational nature of identities together with the totalizing nature of systems it is the distinctive aporia of structuralism.
Conclusions
It is concluded that structuralism is not a holistic approach as classic as is usually thought, and it is suggested that the revelation of this problematic tension between relation and system is one of its major legacies.
References
Althusser, Louis. 1977. Posiciones. México: Grijalbo.
Bastide, Roger. 1972. Sens et usages du terme structure dans les sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Mouton.
Barthes, Roland. 19901985. La aventura semiológica. Barcelona: Paidós.
Benveniste, Emile. 2001. Problemas de lingüística general I. México: Siglo XXI.
Durkheim, Emile. 1986. Las reglas del método sociológico. Madrid: Morata.
—. El suicidio. 1989. Madrid: Akal.
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1961.Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Jacques Lacan. 1966. Ecrits. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1995. Antropología estructural. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
—. 1979. «Introducción a la obra de Marcel Mauss». En Marcel Mauss, Sociología y Antropología. Madrid: Tecnos: 13-44
—. 1977. «La estructura y la forma (reflexiones sobre la obra de Vladimir Propp)». En Niccolini, Silvia (comp.) El análisis estructural. Buenos Aires: CEAL: 35-64
Maniglier, Patrice. 2006. La Vie énigmatique des signes: Saussure et la naissance du structuralisme. Paris: Léo Scheer.
Miller, Jacques Alain. 1988. Matemas II. Buenos Aires: Manantial.
Piaget, Jean. 1968. Le Structuralisme. P.U.F. Paris,
Saussure, Ferdinand. 1980. Curso de Lingüística General. Buenos Aires: Losada.
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 1973. Principios de fonología. Buenos Aires: Cincel.
Comments
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Sergio Esteban Tonkonoff