Keywords
Work
Platforms
Autonomy
Control
Uber
Trabajo
Plataformas
Autonomía
Control
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction: The platform economy has invaded social relations in every way. Products of the information revolution, artificial intelligence and big data, the platforms constitute a sign of the times that crosses and deepens the set of pre-existing mercantile relations while commodifying a series of activities that, until their arrival, were outside to data extractive logic. The consequences of this irruption for the world of work are multiple and profound.
Objectives: Here we propose to analyze the control practices and working conditions at UBER, the company that constitutes a paradigm of the new work management logics through digital platforms.
Methodology: The study is qualitative in nature, based on ten in-depth interviews with UBER drivers during the years 2019 and 2020, in which, among other dimensions, working conditions, control mechanisms and meanings of work were investigated. Likewise, periodic monitoring of two driver and passenger forums was carried out.
Results: Throughout the writing, a multiplicity of daily practices developed by the Uber company to influence the behavior and control the activity of drivers is observed. The platform's capacity to algorithmically manage work in a massive and personalized way is verified, with significant effects on working conditions.
[Continue reading in the article]
References
Abilio, Ludmila. 2019. «Uberizacao: do empreendedorismo para o autogerenciamento subordinado». En Psicoperspectivas, vol 18 num 3.1-10.
Arias, Cora, Nicolás Diana Menéndez y Julieta Haidar. 2020. «LA ORGANIZACIÓN VENCE AL ALGORITMO(?) Plataformas de reparto y procesos de organización de los trabajadores». En revista Pilquen Sección Ciencias Sociales, Universidad del Comahue Vol 23. num 4.15-28.
Avalos, Marcos y Paula Sofia. 2015. «Baby, you can drive my car. El caso de Uber en México». En Economía Informa 390: 104-112.
Bazque, Héctor .2021. «El mercado de trabajo argentino durante la posconvertibilidad. La dinámica de la actividad económica, del empleo y el ingreso en la Argentina». En revista Divulgatio num.15, Universidad de Quilmes.
Berg, Janine, Marianne Furrer, Ellie Harmon, Uma Rani y Silberman. 2018. «Digital labour platform and the future of work. Towards decent work in the online world». International Labour Office, Geneva.
Castel, Robert. 1995. La metamorfosis de la cuestión social. Paidos, Buenos Aires.
Cetyd. 2017. Informe de coyuntura sociolaboral 5. Recuperado de http://noticias.unsam.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Boletincompleto5.pdf
Cetyd. 2018. Informa de coyuntura sociolaboral 8. Recuperado de http://cetyd.unsam.edu.ar/boletin/CETyD-boletin-8-ampliado.pdf
Cifra. 2011. Informe de Coyuntura Nº 7 El nuevo patrón de crecimiento. Argentina 2002-2010. Recuperado de http://www.centrocifra.org.ar/docs/IC%20Nro%207.pdf
Cifra. 2019. Informe de coyuntura n° 32. Recuperado de http://www.centrocifra.org.ar/docs/32.pdf
Collier, Ruth, V.B. Dubal y Christopher Carter. 2017. «Labor platforms and gig work: The failure to regulate». IRLE Working paper, 106-17. Disponible en http://irle.berkeley.edu/files/2017/Labor-Platforms-and-Gig-Work.pdf
Chen, Julie Y. 2018. «Technologies of Control, Communication, and Calculation: Taxi Drivers’ Labour in the Platform Economy». En P.V. Moore et al. (eds.), Humans and Machines at Work, Dynamics of Virtual Work, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58232-0_10
De Stefano, Valerio. 2016. «The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the ‘gig-economy’», Working Paper, 71. Conditions of Work and Employment Series.
Del Nido, Juan. M. 2019. «Tecnología y ansiedad de modernidad: notas etnográficas sobre el conflicto en Buenos Aires». En revista Hpertextos, 7 (11) 171-98.
Diana Menéndez, Nicolás, Cora Arias y Julieta Haidar. 2022. «Prácticas organizativas de trabajadores de plataformas de reparto en Argentina. Un análisis desde la Teoría de los recursos de poder». En Revista Papers, Universidad de Barcelona. En prensa.
Diana Menéndez, Nicolás. 2019. ¿Qué hay de nuevo viejo? Una aproximación a los trabajos de plataforma en Argentina. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (165): 45-58. https://doi.org/10.15517/rcs.v0i165.40064
Durand, Jean Pierre. 2011. La cadena invisible. Flujo tenso y servidumbre voluntaria. Editorial: Fondo de Cultura Económica. México.
Figueiras, Vitor y Ricardo Antunes. 2020. «Plataformas digitais, uberizacao do trabalho e regulacao no capitalismo contemporánea». En Contracampo, 39 (1). Recuperada de https://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/38901
Fleming, Peter. 2017. «The Human capital hoax: work, debt and insecurity in the Era of Uberization». Organization Studies, 38 (5).
Haidar, Julieta, Nicolás Diana Menéndez y Cora Arias. 2020. «La organización vence al algoritmo (?) Plataformas de reparto y procesos de organización de los trabajadores de delivery en Argentina». En Revista Pilquen, 23 (4), 15-28.
Hardt, Michael y Negri Antonio. 2002. Imperio. Paidos, Buenos Aires.
Harvey, David. 2005. «La condición de la posmodernidad». Amorrortu.
Howcroft, Debra y Birgitta Bergvall-Kareborn, 2018 «A typology of Crowdwork Platforms». En Work, employment and society, 33 (1): 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0950017018760136
Lee, Kyung, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, y Laura Dabbish. 2015. «Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers, Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery» (ACM) Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Seoul, 18–23 Apr. 1603–1612.
Madariaga, Javier, César Buenadicha Sánchez, Erika Molina y Christoph Ernst. 2019. Economía de plataformas y empleo ¿Cómo es trabajar para una app en Argentina?, CIPPEC-BID - OIT. Buenos Aires.
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor y Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big Data. La revolución de los datos masivos. Editorial Digital Titivillus.
Miguez, Pablo y Nicolás Diana Menéndez. 2021. Platform workers in Latin America: transnational logics and regional resistances?, Revista Tempo Social, (33): 231-251
Möhlmann, Mareike y Lior Zalmanson. 2017. «Hands on the wheel: Navigating algorithmic management and Uber’s autonomy»Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017), Seoul, 10 –13 Dec.
Polkowska, Dominika. 2019 «Does the app contribute to the precarization of work? The Case of Uber Drivers in Poland». Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco ISSN: 1972-7623 (print version) ISSN: 2035-6609 (electronic version) PACO, 12 (3) 2019: 717-741
Rosenblat, Alex y Luke Stark. 2016. «Algorithmic Labor and information Asymmetries: a case study of Ubr´s drivers». International Journal of Communication, (10): 3758-784.
Scheiber, Noam. 2017. «How Uber Uses Psychological Tricks to Push Its Drivers Buttons». New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/02/technology/uber-drivers-psychological-tricks.html
Scholz, Trebor. 2017. Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Journal of Labor and Society, 20 (4): 552-555.
Srnicek, Nick. 2018. Capitalismo de Plataformas. Caja Negra, Buenos Aires.
Vallas, Steven. y Juliet Schor. 2020. «What do platforms do? Understanding the gig ecnonomy». En Annual Reviews of Sociology, 46: 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
Vallas, Steven. 2018. «Platform Capitalism: what is at Stake for Workers?». New Labor Forum, 1 (28): 48-59. DOI: 10.1177/1095796018817059
Vandaele, Kurt. 2018. «Will trade unions survive in the platform economy? Emerging patterns of platform workers collective voice and representation in Europe». Working paper. European Trade Union Institut.
Comments
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Nicolás Diana Menéndez