Reform of the Organic Law of the Instituto Nacional de Aprendizaje (Costa Rica): the beginning of a privatization disguised as “development”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/0tppdk23

Keywords:

technical education, liberalism, critical thinking, privatization, service sector

Abstract

This study critically analyzes the effects of neoliberalism on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in Costa Rica, particularly following the reform of the Organic Law of the National Learning Institute (INA) through Law 9931. Using a documentary and analytical approach, it examines how the neoliberal discourse—based on the premise that the private sector delivers better goods, services, and working conditions than the public sector—has guided legislative reforms promoting the
privatization of public institutions in Latin America. In the case of INA, a shift toward a quasi-market model is evident, especially through Articles 18 and 21 bis, which allow private companies to provide educational services funded by public resources. Additionally, Article 24, declared unconstitutional, is discussed for undermining labor rights. The study concludes that there is an urgent need to foster critical research on TVET in Costa Rica that promotes an educational model capable of addressing social,
national, and regional demands with justice and equity. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Esteban Paniagua Vega, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica.

    Costa Rican. Master’s degree in Philosophy. He works at the University of Costa Rica and the National University. Among his publications is Some Preparatory Notes for Addressing the Historical Responsibility of General Studies in a Context of Global Collapse and Civilizational Crisis (2024). His research interests include political philosophy, political theory, and Costa Rican politics.

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Reform of the Organic Law of the Instituto Nacional de Aprendizaje (Costa Rica): the beginning of a privatization disguised as “development”. (2026). Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 190, 81-99. https://doi.org/10.15517/0tppdk23