Abstract
Mergers and acquisitions grew an annual 20% between 1990 and 2000, with transactions that surpassed U.S. $1,000 trillions between 1998 and 2000 (Andre, 2004). For that reason, one could believe that they are creative sources of value for companies. However, a study at Business Week during 2002 indicates the contrary, 61% of these transactions destroy shareholders’ value (Andre, 2004). This research looks for relating transaction costs, resources and capacities theories to summarize incomes and costs of mergers and acquisitions’ processes. It systematizes net benefit’s calculation. Until now, the failures in the mergers have been measured by the absence of shareholders value’s increment, by later disinvestment, or using some isolated measures like demotivation in human resources, rotation, etc. Nevertheless, this research contributes integrating a model of valuation in businesses combination and its variables costs, incomes and net benefit in monetary and qualitative terms. The measures are important to feedback the later processes of combinations, to correct the undertaken ones, to manage synergies and to identify the sources of creation and destruction of value.
References
Andre, P. (2004). “Good Adquisitions”. CA Magazine, 137/2 (marzo 2004), pp. 45-58.
Bitzan, J. y Wilson, W. (2007). “Industry Costs and Consolidation: Efficiency Gains and Mergers in the U.S. Railroad Industry”. Review of Industrial Organization, 30: 81–105. Publicado online: 17 mayo 2007. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Capron, L. (1999). “The Long-Term Performance of Horizontal Acquisitions”. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (noviembre 1999), pp. 987-1018.
Capron, L. y Pistre, N. (2002). “When Do Acquirers Earn Abnormal Returns?”. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (2002), pp. 781-794.
Doz, I. (1996). “The Evolution of Cooperation in Strategic Alliances: Initial Conditions or Learning Processes”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 (1996), pp. 55-83.
Dussauge, P.; Garrete, B. y Mitchell, W. (2000). “Learning from Competing Partners: Outcomes and Durations of Scale and Link Alliances in Europe, North America and Asia”. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2000), pp. 99-126.
Empson, L. (2001). “Fear of Exploitation and Fear of Contamination: Impediments to Knowledge Transfer in Mergers Between Professional Service Firms”. Human Relations, 54/7 (julio 2001), pp. 839-854.
Gates, S. y Very, P. (2003). “Measuring Performance During M&A Integration”. Long Range Planning, 36 (2003), pp. 167-185.
Perrow, Charles. (1996). “A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations”. American Sociological Review, (1996), pp. 194-208.
Paruchuri, S. y Hambrick, D. (2006). “Acquisition Integration and Productivity Losses in the Technical Core: Disruption of Inventors in Acquired Companies”. Organization Science, 17/5 (septiembre-octubre 2006), pp. 545-568.
Vermeulen, F. y Barkema, H. (2001). “Learning Through Acquisitions”. Academy of Management Journal, 44/3 (junio 2001), pp. 457-469.
Williamson, O. (1981). “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach”. American Journal of Sociology, 87/3 (1981), pp. 548-577.
Zander, I. (2004). “El espíritu emprendedor en el ámbito geográfico. Fundamentos conceptuales e implicaciones para la formación de nuevos clusters”. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, Núm. 20 (2004), pp. 9-34.
Zollo, M. y Singh, H. (2004). “Deliberate Learning in Corporate Acquisitions: Post-Acquisitions Strategies and Integration Capability in U.S. Bank Mergers”. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (2004), pp. 1233-1256.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright (c) 2009 Nadia Ugalde Binda
