An analysis of pedagogical and theoretical implications: Lessons from studies with English as a foreign language learners

error correction
writtten cf
second language classrom
theoretical and practical implications
corrección de errores
realimentación correctiva escrita
aula de una segunda lengua
implicaciones teóricas y prácticas

How to Cite

Bonilla López, M. (2023). An analysis of pedagogical and theoretical implications: Lessons from studies with English as a foreign language learners. Journal Of Modern Languages, (36). https://doi.org/10.15517/rlm.v0i36.50324

Abstract

Different researchers in the field of error correction (also known as written corrective feedback—CF) have voiced their concern and advocated for research that is conducted in under-represented settings (e.g., Lee, 2014), that investigates a feedback scope in line with common second language (L2) classroom feedback practices (e.g., Hartshorn et al., 2010), and that has a design that looks into factors beyond the end product such as learner variables (e.g., Storch & Wigglesworth, 2010). Against this background, an analysis of previous literature in light of the aforementioned concerns is called for. Specifically, emerging from precursor metanalyses (e.g., Authors, XXXX), three studies in particular (i.e., Bonilla et al., 2017, 2018, 2021) deserve a fine-grained analysis due to their design and ensuing theoretical as well as practical implications. To this end, the objective of this study is to critically analyze how Bonilla et al. (2017, 2018, 2021) —as a response to previous research concerns—widen current understanding of the L2 error correction practice and research

https://doi.org/10.15517/rlm.v0i36.50324

PDF

EPUB

HTML

References

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Bitchener, J. (2012a). A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006

Bitchener, J. (2012b). Written Corrective Feedback for L2 Development: Current Knowledge and Future Research. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 855–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.62

Bitchener,J. & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.

Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written Corrective Feedback for L2 Development (Vol. 96). Multilingual Matters.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010b). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016

Bonilla, M., Van Steendam, E., & Buyse, K. (2017). Comprehensive corrective feedback on low and high proficiency writers: Examining attitudes and preferences. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 91–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.04bon

Bonilla, M., Van Steendam, E., Speelman, D., & Buyse, D. (2021). Comprehensive corrective feedback in second language writing: The response of individual error categories. Journal of Writing Research, 13(vol. 13 issue 1), 31–70. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.01.02

Bonilla, M., Van Steendam, E., Speelman, D., & Buyse, K. (2018). The Differential Effects of Comprehensive Feedback Forms in the Second Language Writing Class: Comprehensive Feedback in the L2 Writing Class. Language Learning, 68(3), 813–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12295

Bruton, A. (2010). Another reply to Truscott on error correction: Improved situated designs over statistics. System, 38(3), 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.07.001

Diab, N. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? Assessing Writing, 24, 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001

Ellis, R., & Shintani. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.

Ellis, Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001

Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375367

Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11.

Ferris, D. (2004). The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005

Ferris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490

Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001

Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N. J. (2010). Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781

Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 207–308.

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(02), 83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399

Lee, I. (2014). Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges. Assessing Writing, 19, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009

Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021

McMartin-Miller, C. (2014). How much feedback is enough?: Instructor practices and student attitudes toward error treatment in second language writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.003

Oladejo, J. A. (1993). Error Correction in ESL: Learner’s Preferences. TESL Canada Journal, 10(2), 71–89.

Polio, C. (2012). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning1. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.

Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.

Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264353

Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 203–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990507

Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002

Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X

Storch, N. (2010). Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29–46.

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369.

Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111–122.

Truscott, J. (2001). Selecting errors for selective error correction. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27(2), 93–108.

Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003

van Beuningen, C. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 1–27.

van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279–296.

van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing: Effectiveness of Comprehensive CF. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.201

##plugins.facebook.comentarios##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Laura Paola Mata Boschini, Marisela Bonilla López, Reading Attitudes of Fourth Year English as a Foreign Language Students , Journal Of Modern Languages: No. 36 (2022)