Keywords
Feedback
English as a Foreign Language
High School Education
Pronunciación
Retroalimentación
Inglés como lengua extranjera
Enseñanza secundaria
How to Cite
Abstract
This study explores the perception of 11th grade EFL students at a public high school in the Concepcion, Chile school district regarding various types of Oral Corrective Feedback (OCF) for pronunciation mistakes. A qualitative research methodology is used with an interpretative paradigm and a case study design. The study sample included 18 high school students in Concepción who participated in a one-on-one semi-structured interview. According to results attained through content analysis, learners considered feedback as beneficial for learning, especially for improving pronunciation. OCF student preferences included implicit feedback and metalinguistic clue strategies. Students also perceived OCF as most effective immediately after concluding the speaking task. This overall aim of the study is to highlight the importance of OCF and its contributions to helping EFL students develop their speaking skills.
References
Cómo citar
Orellana Marihuén, P.F. y Ortiz Navarrete, M.A. (2021). Percepción del estudiantado chileno de enseñanza secundaria hacia distintos tipos de Feedback Correctivo Oral (FCO) en errores de pronunciación: un análisis cualitativo. Revista Educación, 45(2). Recuperado de http://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v45i1.43636
Referencias bibliográficas
Aránguiz, M. y Quintanilla, A. Q. (2016). Oral corrective feedback strategies in EFL. A pilot study in Chilean classrooms/estrategias correctivas orales en inglés como lengua extranjera. Un estudio piloto en las aulas chilenas. ELIA: Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 16, (pp. 103-132). Recuperado de http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ELIA/article/view/17947
Atma, N. y Widiati, U. (2016). EFL students’ preferences for corrective feedback in speaking instruction across speaking course levels. Bahasa dan Seni, 43(2), (pp. 183-195). Recuperado de http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jbs/article/view/194
Baker, A.A. y Burri, M. (2016). Feedback on second language pronunciation: A case study of EAP teachers' beliefs and practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41, (pp. 1-19). Recuperado de https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1112389
Bohn, H. y Hansen, T. (2017). Assessing pronunciation in an EFL context: Teachers’ orientations towards nativeness and intelligibility. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(1), (pp. 54-68). doi: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15434303.2016.1256407
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587655
Canabal, C. y Margalef, L. (2017). La retroalimentación: la clave para la evaluación orientada al aprendizaje. Profesorado, 2, (pp. 149-170) Recuperado de https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/47669
CEPPE (2010). Liceos de Excelencia: Ideas y experiencias relevantes para
su diseño e implementación, Notas de Educación. 3, (pp. 1-10). Recuperado de http://200.6.99.248/~bru487cl/files/Liceos_Excelencia%5B1%5D.pdf
Cisterna, F. (2005). Categorización y triangulación como procesos de validación del conocimiento en investigación cualitativa. Theoria, 14(1), (pp. 61-71). Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/299/29900107.pdf
Contreras, G. y Zúñiga, C. (2017). Concepciones de profesores sobre retroalimentación: Una revisión de la literatura. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 9(19), (pp. 69-90). Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2810/281052678004.pdf
Ellis, R. y Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), (pp. 575-600). Recuperado de https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ777403
Ellis, R. (2017a). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. En H. Nassaji y E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications, (pp.19-36). New York, NY: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621432
Ellis, R. (2017b). Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective. Avances En Educación Y Humanidades, 2(2), (pp. 7-22). doi: https://doi.org/10.21897/25394185.1482
Eyzaguirre, S. (2016). ¿Por qué Liceos de Excelencia? Revista Puntos de Referencia. Centro de Estudios públicos. 448, (pp. 1-18). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3t7zlmE
Gibbs, G. (2012). El análisis de datos cualitativos en investigación cualitativa: Graham Gibbs. Madrid: Morata. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2GlwmUV
Hanh, P. y Tho, P. (2018). Oral corrective feedback in EFL/ESL classrooms: Classification models. VNU Journal Of Foreign Studies, 34(5), (pp. 40-48). Recuperado de https://js.vnu.edu.vn/FS/article/view/4301
Hattie, J. y Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), (pp. 81-112). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3n6JGxo
Hernández, R., Fernández. C y Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación, (Quinta Edición). México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana. Recuperado de http://www.ru.tic.unam.mx:8080/handle/123456789/1825
Hernández, E. y Reyes, M. (2012). Teachers' perceptions about oral corrective feedback and their practice in EFL classrooms. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 14(2), (pp. 63-75). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2G9FVq8
Huang, X. y Jia, X. (2016). Corrective Feedback on Pronunciation: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(6) (pp. 245-254). doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n6p245
Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English Pronunciation. Londres y Nueva York: Longman. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3vjAhpo
Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. London: Sage. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208963
Lyster, R., y Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, (pp. 37–66). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3eGlrTe
Lyster, R. y Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in second language acquisition, 32 (pp. 265-302). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3vsPnsy
Marzá, N. (2014). Pronunciation and comprehension of oral English in the English as a foreign language class: Key aspects, students’ perceptions and proposals. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), (pp. 262-273). doi: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.262-273
Ministerio de educación chileno. (2019a). Nuevo Curriculum 3° y 4° medio. Unidad de Currículum y Evaluación UCE. Santiago: MINEDUC. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2GiO8If
Ministerio de educación chileno. (2019b). Bases Curriculares 3° y 4° medio. Santiago: MINEDUC. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2EIIVcf
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. y Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third edition.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. Recuperado de https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED565763
Muñoz, B. y Ferreira, A. (2017). El Feedback Correctivo Escrito Indirecto en el Aprendizaje de la Forma Comparativa de Adjetivos en Inglés. Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura, Barcelona, 27(1), (pp. 73-89). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3jg7yw2
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill/Contemporary. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2Gmvi2O
Plano, V.L. y Creswell, J.W. (2015). Understanding Research: A consumer’s guide. 2nd edition. London, UK: Pearson. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/33fE5N8
Poulos, A. y Mahony, M.J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), (pp. 143-154). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601127869
Pourhosein, A.G. (2012). A study of factors affecting EFL learners‟ English pronunciation Learning and the strategies for instruction. The International journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), (pp. 119-128). Recuperado de http://ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_3_February_2012/17.pdf
Quinn, P. y Nakata, T. (2017). The timing of oral corrective feedback. En H. Nassaji y E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 35-47). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Recuperado de https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=id&cluster=12836719597277449348
Ruiz‐ Olabuenaga, J. (2003). Técnicas de triangulación y control de calidad en la investigación socioeducativa. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=326747
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, (pp. 209-31).
Shabani, K. y Safari, F. (2016). Immediate vs Delayed Correction Feedback (CF) and Accuracy of Oral Production: The Role of Anxiety. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6, (pp. 2222-2230). doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0611.21
Sheen, Y. (2010a). The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), (pp. 169-179). doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990489
Sheen, Y. (2010b). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), (pp. 201-234). doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990507
Sheen, Y. y Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. En E. Hinkle (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (2), (pp. 593-610). New York, NY: Routledge. Recuperado de https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/60482
Soriano, A. M. (2014). Diseño y validación de instrumentos de medición. Diálogos. 14, (pp. 19-40). Recuperado de http://www.lamjol.info/index.php/DIALOGOS/article/view/2202/1997
Ur, P. (2009). A course in English language teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2SemcYA
Viloria, J., Bertel, M. y Daza, A. (2015). Percepciones estudiantiles sobre el proceso de acreditación por alta calidad del programa de administración de empresas de la Universidad del Magdalena. Praxis, 11, (pp. 89-102). doi: https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.1557