Basic movement patterns in jumping: an assessment of the process and output

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between output assessment and process assessment for basic movement patterns in jumping and throwing. Forty subjects, all male, 10.03 ± 0.3 years old, 37.82 ± 13.9 kg, 139 ± 28 cm and 19.38 ± 4.5 IMC (kg/m2) participated. The Basic Movement Patterns Instrument (IPBM) was used for assessing the process. For the output, length jump and over-the-shoulder throw tests were made for jumping and throwing, respectively. A descriptive statistics was carried out (averages and standard deviations) for the anthropometric measurements, and for examining the relationship of the outcomes of the two output and process attempts, Spearman correlation at a significance level of p ≤ 0.5 and p ≤ .01 was used. The resulting correlations showed the existence of a positive and significant relationship between process assessment and output assessment of jumping of (r = 0.447; p = .004; r2 = 0.200) in attempt 1 and of (r = 0.562; p < .0001; r2 = 0.316) in attempt 2. Similar results were found between process assessment and output assessment of throwing, (r = 0.332; p = .043; r2 = 0.011) in attempt 1 and (r = 0.311; p = .051, r2 = 0.097) in attempt 2. The correlation indicates that the subjects with the best results in process-oriented assessments have better results in output-oriented assessments; this suggests that the output can be improved by improving the technique. In understanding how process-oriented assessment and output-oriented assessment are mutually related, and in identifying what you want to measure and for what purpose, objectivity can be expected in the methods for assessing the performance of human movement with a process and output approach.